A Comparison of the Diets of Gulf Killifish, Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard, Entering and Leaving a Mississippi Brackish Marsh

We examined the diets of Gulf killifish, Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard, collected monthly from March through July 1988 with unbaited minnow traps during two sampling periods: (1) on flood tides before they reached the marsh surface, and (2) on ebb tides as they left the marsh. Thirty-five prey t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Estuaries 1990-09, Vol.13 (3), p.332-336
Main Authors: Rozas, Lawrence P., LaSalle, Mark W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Coastal ecology
Crabs
Diet
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundulus grandis
Gulfs
Marine
Marine ecology
Marine fishes
Marshes
Stomach
Taxa
Wetland ecology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examined the diets of Gulf killifish, Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard, collected monthly from March through July 1988 with unbaited minnow traps during two sampling periods: (1) on flood tides before they reached the marsh surface, and (2) on ebb tides as they left the marsh. Thirty-five prey taxa, plant parts, and detritus were identified from the stomach contents of 110 Gulf killifish (mean SL = 55 mm, range = 30-82 mm). Fiddler crabs, Uca longisignalis Salmon and Atsaides; amphipods, mostly Corophium louisianum Shoemaker; tanaidaceans, Hargeria rapax (Harger); and hydrobiids, Littoridinops palustris Thompson, were their most important prey. Killifish diets differed both quantitatively and qualitatively relative to the habitat in which they were feeding. Fiddler crabs and polychaetes were consumed more frequently and in greater numbers in the intertidal zone, whereas more amphipods were eaten by killifish feeding in subtidal and low intertidal areas. Gulf killifish consumed a greater volume of food when they had access to the marsh surface than when they were confined to subtidal areas.
ISSN:0160-8347
1559-2758
DOI:10.2307/1351924