Loading…

Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary

The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of graz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Estuaries 1996-12, Vol.19 (4), p.874-889
Main Authors: Lonsdale, Darcy J., Cosper, Elizabeth M., Doall, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533
cites
container_end_page 889
container_issue 4
container_start_page 874
container_title Estuaries
container_volume 19
creator Lonsdale, Darcy J.
Cosper, Elizabeth M.
Doall, Michael
description The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1352304
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15899433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1352304</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1352304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEURYMoWKv4B1xkIboazcckM7PUUluhoFjduBnSfNjU6aQmGaX99U7pYLeu7nu8w4F3ATjH6IZQlN1iytpMD0APM1YkJGP5IeghzFGS0zQ7BichLBDCRcazHqiGxmgZA3QGvju3qkT9GV0NR15sbP0B2_F5vo77w9RudDKNvpGx8RqKWsF765YiBGhrGOcaTtyP9nDcqNDiL_a7XYYhNsKvT8GREVXQZ132wdvD8HUwTiZPo8fB3SSRKcIxSSXTRLFMGEKKWcaV5myGkcqlVEZjJYkUqSpmheKcaSlYLgnhRAhDNU8ZpX1wtfOuvPtqdIjl0gapq_YH7ZpQYpYXRUr_AVJOMWe8Ba93oPQuBK9NufJ22b5UYlRuay-72lvyslOKIEVlvKilDX844YhlZCu82GGLEJ3f2zrLL2YRi-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13631656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lonsdale, Darcy J. ; Cosper, Elizabeth M. ; Doall, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Lonsdale, Darcy J. ; Cosper, Elizabeth M. ; Doall, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of mesozooplankton (&gt;210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1352304</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTUDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Estuarine Research Federation</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Carbon ; Copepoda ; Diatoms ; Ditylum brightwellii ; Egg production ; Estuaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ingestion ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Primary productivity ; Surface water ; Synecology ; Thalassiosira pseudonana ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Estuaries, 1996-12, Vol.19 (4), p.874-889</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Estuarine Research Federation</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1352304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1352304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2605726$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doall, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</title><title>Estuaries</title><description>The impact of mesozooplankton (&gt;210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Ditylum brightwellii</subject><subject>Egg production</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Primary productivity</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Thalassiosira pseudonana</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0160-8347</issn><issn>1559-2758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEURYMoWKv4B1xkIboazcckM7PUUluhoFjduBnSfNjU6aQmGaX99U7pYLeu7nu8w4F3ATjH6IZQlN1iytpMD0APM1YkJGP5IeghzFGS0zQ7BichLBDCRcazHqiGxmgZA3QGvju3qkT9GV0NR15sbP0B2_F5vo77w9RudDKNvpGx8RqKWsF765YiBGhrGOcaTtyP9nDcqNDiL_a7XYYhNsKvT8GREVXQZ132wdvD8HUwTiZPo8fB3SSRKcIxSSXTRLFMGEKKWcaV5myGkcqlVEZjJYkUqSpmheKcaSlYLgnhRAhDNU8ZpX1wtfOuvPtqdIjl0gapq_YH7ZpQYpYXRUr_AVJOMWe8Ba93oPQuBK9NufJ22b5UYlRuay-72lvyslOKIEVlvKilDX844YhlZCu82GGLEJ3f2zrLL2YRi-Q</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</creator><creator>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Doall, Michael</creator><general>Estuarine Research Federation</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</title><author>Lonsdale, Darcy J. ; Cosper, Elizabeth M. ; Doall, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Ditylum brightwellii</topic><topic>Egg production</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Primary productivity</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doall, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</au><au>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Doall, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>874</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>874-889</pages><issn>0160-8347</issn><eissn>1559-2758</eissn><coden>ESTUDO</coden><abstract>The impact of mesozooplankton (&gt;210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Estuarine Research Federation</pub><doi>10.2307/1352304</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-8347
ispartof Estuaries, 1996-12, Vol.19 (4), p.874-889
issn 0160-8347
1559-2758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15899433
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Brackish water ecosystems
Carbon
Copepoda
Diatoms
Ditylum brightwellii
Egg production
Estuaries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Ingestion
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Primary productivity
Surface water
Synecology
Thalassiosira pseudonana
Zooplankton
title Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A15%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Zooplankton%20Grazing%20on%20Phytoplankton%20Size-Structure%20and%20Biomass%20in%20the%20Lower%20Hudson%20River%20Estuary&rft.jtitle=Estuaries&rft.au=Lonsdale,%20Darcy%20J.&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=874-889&rft.issn=0160-8347&rft.eissn=1559-2758&rft.coden=ESTUDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1352304&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1352304%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13631656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1352304&rfr_iscdi=true