Loading…
Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary
The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of graz...
Saved in:
Published in: | Estuaries 1996-12, Vol.19 (4), p.874-889 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 889 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 874 |
container_title | Estuaries |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lonsdale, Darcy J. Cosper, Elizabeth M. Doall, Michael |
description | The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1352304 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15899433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1352304</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1352304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEURYMoWKv4B1xkIboazcckM7PUUluhoFjduBnSfNjU6aQmGaX99U7pYLeu7nu8w4F3ATjH6IZQlN1iytpMD0APM1YkJGP5IeghzFGS0zQ7BichLBDCRcazHqiGxmgZA3QGvju3qkT9GV0NR15sbP0B2_F5vo77w9RudDKNvpGx8RqKWsF765YiBGhrGOcaTtyP9nDcqNDiL_a7XYYhNsKvT8GREVXQZ132wdvD8HUwTiZPo8fB3SSRKcIxSSXTRLFMGEKKWcaV5myGkcqlVEZjJYkUqSpmheKcaSlYLgnhRAhDNU8ZpX1wtfOuvPtqdIjl0gapq_YH7ZpQYpYXRUr_AVJOMWe8Ba93oPQuBK9NufJ22b5UYlRuay-72lvyslOKIEVlvKilDX844YhlZCu82GGLEJ3f2zrLL2YRi-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13631656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lonsdale, Darcy J. ; Cosper, Elizabeth M. ; Doall, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Lonsdale, Darcy J. ; Cosper, Elizabeth M. ; Doall, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1352304</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTUDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Estuarine Research Federation</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Carbon ; Copepoda ; Diatoms ; Ditylum brightwellii ; Egg production ; Estuaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ingestion ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Primary productivity ; Surface water ; Synecology ; Thalassiosira pseudonana ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Estuaries, 1996-12, Vol.19 (4), p.874-889</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Estuarine Research Federation</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1352304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1352304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2605726$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doall, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</title><title>Estuaries</title><description>The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Ditylum brightwellii</subject><subject>Egg production</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Primary productivity</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Thalassiosira pseudonana</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0160-8347</issn><issn>1559-2758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEURYMoWKv4B1xkIboazcckM7PUUluhoFjduBnSfNjU6aQmGaX99U7pYLeu7nu8w4F3ATjH6IZQlN1iytpMD0APM1YkJGP5IeghzFGS0zQ7BichLBDCRcazHqiGxmgZA3QGvju3qkT9GV0NR15sbP0B2_F5vo77w9RudDKNvpGx8RqKWsF765YiBGhrGOcaTtyP9nDcqNDiL_a7XYYhNsKvT8GREVXQZ132wdvD8HUwTiZPo8fB3SSRKcIxSSXTRLFMGEKKWcaV5myGkcqlVEZjJYkUqSpmheKcaSlYLgnhRAhDNU8ZpX1wtfOuvPtqdIjl0gapq_YH7ZpQYpYXRUr_AVJOMWe8Ba93oPQuBK9NufJ22b5UYlRuay-72lvyslOKIEVlvKilDX844YhlZCu82GGLEJ3f2zrLL2YRi-Q</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</creator><creator>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Doall, Michael</creator><general>Estuarine Research Federation</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</title><author>Lonsdale, Darcy J. ; Cosper, Elizabeth M. ; Doall, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Ditylum brightwellii</topic><topic>Egg production</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Primary productivity</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doall, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lonsdale, Darcy J.</au><au>Cosper, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Doall, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>874</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>874-889</pages><issn>0160-8347</issn><eissn>1559-2758</eissn><coden>ESTUDO</coden><abstract>The impact of mesozooplankton (>210 μm, mostly adult copepods and late-stage copepodites) and micrometazoa (64-210 μm, mostly copepod nauplii) on phytoplankton size structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary was investigated using various 14 C-labeled algal species as tracers of grazing on natural phytoplankton. During spring and summer, zooplankton grazing pressure, defined as% = mg C ingested m-2 h-1 mg C produced m-2 h-1 (depth-integrated rates) × 100, on total phytoplankton ranged between 0.04% and 1.9% for mesozooplankton and 0.1% and 6.6% for micrometazoa. The greatest grazing impact was measured in fall when 20.2% and 44.6%, respectively, of the total depth-integrated primary production from surface water phytoplankton was grazed. Mesozooplankton exhibited some size-selective grazing on phytoplankton, preferentially grazing the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana over the larger diatom Ditylum brightwelli, but this was not found for micrometazoa. Neither zooplankton group grazed on the dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. We conclude that metazoan zooplankton have a minimal role in controlling total phytoplankton biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Differences in the growth coefficients of various phytoplankton size-fractions-not grazing selectivity-may be the predominant factor explaining community size-structure.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Estuarine Research Federation</pub><doi>10.2307/1352304</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-8347 |
ispartof | Estuaries, 1996-12, Vol.19 (4), p.874-889 |
issn | 0160-8347 1559-2758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15899433 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Brackish Brackish water ecosystems Carbon Copepoda Diatoms Ditylum brightwellii Egg production Estuaries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Ingestion Phytoplankton Plankton Primary productivity Surface water Synecology Thalassiosira pseudonana Zooplankton |
title | Effects of Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton Size-Structure and Biomass in the Lower Hudson River Estuary |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A15%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Zooplankton%20Grazing%20on%20Phytoplankton%20Size-Structure%20and%20Biomass%20in%20the%20Lower%20Hudson%20River%20Estuary&rft.jtitle=Estuaries&rft.au=Lonsdale,%20Darcy%20J.&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=874-889&rft.issn=0160-8347&rft.eissn=1559-2758&rft.coden=ESTUDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1352304&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1352304%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-4c5e2d57af229b76de65b10d8ccdfe1dc2ca4d9b9d665eca58c2262aaf3e64533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13631656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1352304&rfr_iscdi=true |