Loading…

Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay

We measured annual discharges of water, sediments, and nutrients from 10 watersheds with differing proportions of agricultural lands in the Piedmont physiographic province of the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Flow-weighted mean concentrations of total N, nitrate, and dissolved silicate in watershed disch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1997-06, Vol.33 (3), p.631-645
Main Authors: Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.), Correll, D.L, Weller, D.E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 645
container_issue 3
container_start_page 631
container_title Journal of the American Water Resources Association
container_volume 33
creator Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.)
Correll, D.L
Weller, D.E
description We measured annual discharges of water, sediments, and nutrients from 10 watersheds with differing proportions of agricultural lands in the Piedmont physiographic province of the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Flow-weighted mean concentrations of total N, nitrate, and dissolved silicate in watershed discharges were correlated with the proportion of cropland in the watershed. In contrast, concentrations of P species did not correlate with cropland. Organic P and C correlated with the concentration of suspended particles, which differed among watersheds. Thus, the ratio of N:P:Si in discharges differed greatly among watersheds, potentially affecting N, P or Si limitation of phytoplankton growth in the receiving waters. Simple regression models of N discharge versus the percentage of cropland suggest that croplands discharge 29-42 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and other lands discharge 1.2-5.8 kg N ha-1 yr-1. We estimated net anthropogenic input of N to croplands and other lands using county level data on agriculture and N deposition from the atmosphere. For most of the study watersheds, N discharge amounted to less than half of the net anthropogenic N
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03538.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15984947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15984947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f244t-4484f8a8df15668d84fdee30bc4c6733232c3407746eb9e7c8638b2ff882489f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFLwzAQxoMoOKd_glB88K01adImfdShUxxT1OHwJaTtZeu2NjVpcfvvjU68l--O-3Hf8SF0QXBEfF2tIsKTOCSpEBHJMh51OaYJFdH2AA3-V4e-xxkNGWfzY3Ti3ApjkhBBB-hlaprWVE0XONPbAoKycsVS2QW4wOig6TtbQdO5QFtTB88VlLXx8JfqwLollL_UaAlOtaDWENyo3Sk60mrj4OxPh2h2d_s2ug8nT-OH0fUk1DFjXciYYFooUWqSpKko_VQCUJwXrEg5pTGNC8ow5yyFPANeiJSKPNZaiJiJTNMhutzfba357MF1sva_w2ajGjC9kyTJBMsY92C4ByvXwVa2tqqV3Ull19Ib8US-T8fy0ac2ZfMPOfH8-Z7Xyki1sJWTs9efdHHCcZrSb-9Jbj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15984947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.) ; Correll, D.L ; Weller, D.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.) ; Correll, D.L ; Weller, D.E</creatorcontrib><description>We measured annual discharges of water, sediments, and nutrients from 10 watersheds with differing proportions of agricultural lands in the Piedmont physiographic province of the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Flow-weighted mean concentrations of total N, nitrate, and dissolved silicate in watershed discharges were correlated with the proportion of cropland in the watershed. In contrast, concentrations of P species did not correlate with cropland. Organic P and C correlated with the concentration of suspended particles, which differed among watersheds. Thus, the ratio of N:P:Si in discharges differed greatly among watersheds, potentially affecting N, P or Si limitation of phytoplankton growth in the receiving waters. Simple regression models of N discharge versus the percentage of cropland suggest that croplands discharge 29-42 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and other lands discharge 1.2-5.8 kg N ha-1 yr-1. We estimated net anthropogenic input of N to croplands and other lands using county level data on agriculture and N deposition from the atmosphere. For most of the study watersheds, N discharge amounted to less than half of the net anthropogenic N</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03538.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>agriculture ; AGUA ; ASPECTOS FISIOGRAFICOS ; AZOTE ; BASSIN VERSANT ; Brackish ; Chesapeake Bay ; COASTAL PLAINS ; COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO ; COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN ; CORRELATION ; CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS ; DRAINAGE ; DRENAJE ; EAU ; ELEMENT GEOMORPHOLOGIQUE ; FARMLAND ; FOSFORO ; Freshwater ; HUMAN ACTIVITY ; HUMAN BEHAVIOUR ; LLANURA COSTERA ; Marine ; MARYLAND ; NITROGEN ; NITROGENO ; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION ; NUTRIENTES ; NUTRIENTS ; PENNSYLVANIA ; PENNSYLVANIE ; PHOSPHORE ; PHOSPHORUS ; PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES ; PLAINE COTIERE ; POLLUTION ; POLUCION ; SEDIMENT ; SEDIMENTO ; SILICATE ; SILICATES ; SILICATOS ; SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE ; TERRE AGRICOLE ; TIERRAS AGRICOLAS ; WATER ; water quality ; WATERSHEDS</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1997-06, Vol.33 (3), p.631-645</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correll, D.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, D.E</creatorcontrib><title>Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>We measured annual discharges of water, sediments, and nutrients from 10 watersheds with differing proportions of agricultural lands in the Piedmont physiographic province of the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Flow-weighted mean concentrations of total N, nitrate, and dissolved silicate in watershed discharges were correlated with the proportion of cropland in the watershed. In contrast, concentrations of P species did not correlate with cropland. Organic P and C correlated with the concentration of suspended particles, which differed among watersheds. Thus, the ratio of N:P:Si in discharges differed greatly among watersheds, potentially affecting N, P or Si limitation of phytoplankton growth in the receiving waters. Simple regression models of N discharge versus the percentage of cropland suggest that croplands discharge 29-42 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and other lands discharge 1.2-5.8 kg N ha-1 yr-1. We estimated net anthropogenic input of N to croplands and other lands using county level data on agriculture and N deposition from the atmosphere. For most of the study watersheds, N discharge amounted to less than half of the net anthropogenic N</description><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>AGUA</subject><subject>ASPECTOS FISIOGRAFICOS</subject><subject>AZOTE</subject><subject>BASSIN VERSANT</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Chesapeake Bay</subject><subject>COASTAL PLAINS</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN</subject><subject>CORRELATION</subject><subject>CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS</subject><subject>DRAINAGE</subject><subject>DRENAJE</subject><subject>EAU</subject><subject>ELEMENT GEOMORPHOLOGIQUE</subject><subject>FARMLAND</subject><subject>FOSFORO</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>HUMAN ACTIVITY</subject><subject>HUMAN BEHAVIOUR</subject><subject>LLANURA COSTERA</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>MARYLAND</subject><subject>NITROGEN</subject><subject>NITROGENO</subject><subject>NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION</subject><subject>NUTRIENTES</subject><subject>NUTRIENTS</subject><subject>PENNSYLVANIA</subject><subject>PENNSYLVANIE</subject><subject>PHOSPHORE</subject><subject>PHOSPHORUS</subject><subject>PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES</subject><subject>PLAINE COTIERE</subject><subject>POLLUTION</subject><subject>POLUCION</subject><subject>SEDIMENT</subject><subject>SEDIMENTO</subject><subject>SILICATE</subject><subject>SILICATES</subject><subject>SILICATOS</subject><subject>SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE</subject><subject>TERRE AGRICOLE</subject><subject>TIERRAS AGRICOLAS</subject><subject>WATER</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>WATERSHEDS</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFLwzAQxoMoOKd_glB88K01adImfdShUxxT1OHwJaTtZeu2NjVpcfvvjU68l--O-3Hf8SF0QXBEfF2tIsKTOCSpEBHJMh51OaYJFdH2AA3-V4e-xxkNGWfzY3Ti3ApjkhBBB-hlaprWVE0XONPbAoKycsVS2QW4wOig6TtbQdO5QFtTB88VlLXx8JfqwLollL_UaAlOtaDWENyo3Sk60mrj4OxPh2h2d_s2ug8nT-OH0fUk1DFjXciYYFooUWqSpKko_VQCUJwXrEg5pTGNC8ow5yyFPANeiJSKPNZaiJiJTNMhutzfba357MF1sva_w2ajGjC9kyTJBMsY92C4ByvXwVa2tqqV3Ull19Ib8US-T8fy0ac2ZfMPOfH8-Z7Xyki1sJWTs9efdHHCcZrSb-9Jbj8</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.)</creator><creator>Correll, D.L</creator><creator>Weller, D.E</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay</title><author>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.) ; Correll, D.L ; Weller, D.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f244t-4484f8a8df15668d84fdee30bc4c6733232c3407746eb9e7c8638b2ff882489f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>AGUA</topic><topic>ASPECTOS FISIOGRAFICOS</topic><topic>AZOTE</topic><topic>BASSIN VERSANT</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Chesapeake Bay</topic><topic>COASTAL PLAINS</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN</topic><topic>CORRELATION</topic><topic>CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS</topic><topic>DRAINAGE</topic><topic>DRENAJE</topic><topic>EAU</topic><topic>ELEMENT GEOMORPHOLOGIQUE</topic><topic>FARMLAND</topic><topic>FOSFORO</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>HUMAN ACTIVITY</topic><topic>HUMAN BEHAVIOUR</topic><topic>LLANURA COSTERA</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>MARYLAND</topic><topic>NITROGEN</topic><topic>NITROGENO</topic><topic>NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION</topic><topic>NUTRIENTES</topic><topic>NUTRIENTS</topic><topic>PENNSYLVANIA</topic><topic>PENNSYLVANIE</topic><topic>PHOSPHORE</topic><topic>PHOSPHORUS</topic><topic>PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES</topic><topic>PLAINE COTIERE</topic><topic>POLLUTION</topic><topic>POLUCION</topic><topic>SEDIMENT</topic><topic>SEDIMENTO</topic><topic>SILICATE</topic><topic>SILICATES</topic><topic>SILICATOS</topic><topic>SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE</topic><topic>TERRE AGRICOLE</topic><topic>TIERRAS AGRICOLAS</topic><topic>WATER</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>WATERSHEDS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correll, D.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, D.E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, T.E. (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD.)</au><au>Correll, D.L</au><au>Weller, D.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>631-645</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><abstract>We measured annual discharges of water, sediments, and nutrients from 10 watersheds with differing proportions of agricultural lands in the Piedmont physiographic province of the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Flow-weighted mean concentrations of total N, nitrate, and dissolved silicate in watershed discharges were correlated with the proportion of cropland in the watershed. In contrast, concentrations of P species did not correlate with cropland. Organic P and C correlated with the concentration of suspended particles, which differed among watersheds. Thus, the ratio of N:P:Si in discharges differed greatly among watersheds, potentially affecting N, P or Si limitation of phytoplankton growth in the receiving waters. Simple regression models of N discharge versus the percentage of cropland suggest that croplands discharge 29-42 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and other lands discharge 1.2-5.8 kg N ha-1 yr-1. We estimated net anthropogenic input of N to croplands and other lands using county level data on agriculture and N deposition from the atmosphere. For most of the study watersheds, N discharge amounted to less than half of the net anthropogenic N</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03538.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-474X
ispartof Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1997-06, Vol.33 (3), p.631-645
issn 1093-474X
1752-1688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15984947
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects agriculture
AGUA
ASPECTOS FISIOGRAFICOS
AZOTE
BASSIN VERSANT
Brackish
Chesapeake Bay
COASTAL PLAINS
COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO
COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN
CORRELATION
CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS
DRAINAGE
DRENAJE
EAU
ELEMENT GEOMORPHOLOGIQUE
FARMLAND
FOSFORO
Freshwater
HUMAN ACTIVITY
HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
LLANURA COSTERA
Marine
MARYLAND
NITROGEN
NITROGENO
NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION
NUTRIENTES
NUTRIENTS
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIE
PHOSPHORE
PHOSPHORUS
PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES
PLAINE COTIERE
POLLUTION
POLUCION
SEDIMENT
SEDIMENTO
SILICATE
SILICATES
SILICATOS
SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE
TERRE AGRICOLE
TIERRAS AGRICOLAS
WATER
water quality
WATERSHEDS
title Nonpoint source discharges of nutrients from Piedmont watersheds of Chesapeake Bay
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A52%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonpoint%20source%20discharges%20of%20nutrients%20from%20Piedmont%20watersheds%20of%20Chesapeake%20Bay&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Jordan,%20T.E.%20(Smithsonian%20Environmental%20Research%20Center,%20Edgewater,%20MD.)&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=631-645&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03538.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E15984947%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f244t-4484f8a8df15668d84fdee30bc4c6733232c3407746eb9e7c8638b2ff882489f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15984947&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true