Loading…

Secondary production of Chironomidae (Diptera) in a north temperate stream

SUMMARY 1. Secondary production of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a third‐order northern Indiana stream was estimated using species‐specific, and in most cases cohort‐specific, life‐history data from the field. 2. Chironomid life‐history patterns were diverse, ranging from one to four genera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater biology 1991-06, Vol.25 (3), p.497-505
Main Authors: BERG, MARTIN B., HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993
container_end_page 505
container_issue 3
container_start_page 497
container_title Freshwater biology
container_volume 25
creator BERG, MARTIN B.
HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.
description SUMMARY 1. Secondary production of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a third‐order northern Indiana stream was estimated using species‐specific, and in most cases cohort‐specific, life‐history data from the field. 2. Chironomid life‐history patterns were diverse, ranging from one to four generations per year in addition to asynchronous development. Cohort production intervals (CPI) for all taxa ranged from 56 to 266 days. CPI for cohorts of conspecifics differed up to 3‐fold. 3. Annual secondary production was estimated using the instantaneous growth method or the size—frequency method depending on whether cohorts were distinguishable or not. Total annual chironomid production was 29 700 mg dry mass m−2, which is the highest value reported for chironomids from a north temperate stream. 4. Eighty per cent of the total chironomid production was attributed to five species: Diamesa nivoriunda (33.9%), Cricotopus bicinctus (16.6%), Pagastia sp. (10.2%), C. trifascia (9.7%) and Orthodadius obumbratus (9.6%). 5. The annual P:B ratio ranged from 4.7 to 21.9. Thus, high secondary production was due to high mean annual standing stocks and not to rapid biomass turnover.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01392.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16049360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16049360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1rFDEUhgdRcG39D0FE9GKm-c7EC6FubasURVwpeBMy2TM068xkTbJ0---bZZe9leYigXPePOfwVNUbghtSztmqIUyKmnKqGqI1aXKHCdO02T6rZsfW82qGMZe1wAq_rF6ltMIYt0LRWfXtF7gwLW18QOsYlhuXfZhQ6NH8zscwhdEvLaD3F36dIdoPyE_IoinEfIcyjOtSy4BSjmDH0-pFb4cErw_vSfX78stifl3f_Lj6Oj-_qR3nQpWbEqVx27rOdUCpBNxKp3uHlXZt53qpynYU3FLivmeMdNAB1x13nbBOa3ZSvdtzy8L_NpCyGX1yMAx2grBJhkjMNZP4_0GhlaSaluDHfdDFkFKE3qyjH4sTQ7DZeTYrs5NpdjLNzrM5eDbb8vntYYpNzg59tJPz6UgQnBHKRYl92sfu_QAPTxhgLm8_c60KoN4DfMqwPQJs_GukYkqY2-9XZjHX_M9CX5if7BFg7KFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15976292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary production of Chironomidae (Diptera) in a north temperate stream</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>BERG, MARTIN B. ; HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</creator><creatorcontrib>BERG, MARTIN B. ; HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY 1. Secondary production of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a third‐order northern Indiana stream was estimated using species‐specific, and in most cases cohort‐specific, life‐history data from the field. 2. Chironomid life‐history patterns were diverse, ranging from one to four generations per year in addition to asynchronous development. Cohort production intervals (CPI) for all taxa ranged from 56 to 266 days. CPI for cohorts of conspecifics differed up to 3‐fold. 3. Annual secondary production was estimated using the instantaneous growth method or the size—frequency method depending on whether cohorts were distinguishable or not. Total annual chironomid production was 29 700 mg dry mass m−2, which is the highest value reported for chironomids from a north temperate stream. 4. Eighty per cent of the total chironomid production was attributed to five species: Diamesa nivoriunda (33.9%), Cricotopus bicinctus (16.6%), Pagastia sp. (10.2%), C. trifascia (9.7%) and Orthodadius obumbratus (9.6%). 5. The annual P:B ratio ranged from 4.7 to 21.9. Thus, high secondary production was due to high mean annual standing stocks and not to rapid biomass turnover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01392.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FWBLAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chironomidae ; Diptera ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 1991-06, Vol.25 (3), p.497-505</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1991.tb01392.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2427.1991.tb01392.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1411,27905,27906,46030,46454</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5431245$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BERG, MARTIN B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary production of Chironomidae (Diptera) in a north temperate stream</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>SUMMARY 1. Secondary production of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a third‐order northern Indiana stream was estimated using species‐specific, and in most cases cohort‐specific, life‐history data from the field. 2. Chironomid life‐history patterns were diverse, ranging from one to four generations per year in addition to asynchronous development. Cohort production intervals (CPI) for all taxa ranged from 56 to 266 days. CPI for cohorts of conspecifics differed up to 3‐fold. 3. Annual secondary production was estimated using the instantaneous growth method or the size—frequency method depending on whether cohorts were distinguishable or not. Total annual chironomid production was 29 700 mg dry mass m−2, which is the highest value reported for chironomids from a north temperate stream. 4. Eighty per cent of the total chironomid production was attributed to five species: Diamesa nivoriunda (33.9%), Cricotopus bicinctus (16.6%), Pagastia sp. (10.2%), C. trifascia (9.7%) and Orthodadius obumbratus (9.6%). 5. The annual P:B ratio ranged from 4.7 to 21.9. Thus, high secondary production was due to high mean annual standing stocks and not to rapid biomass turnover.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chironomidae</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkF1rFDEUhgdRcG39D0FE9GKm-c7EC6FubasURVwpeBMy2TM068xkTbJ0---bZZe9leYigXPePOfwVNUbghtSztmqIUyKmnKqGqI1aXKHCdO02T6rZsfW82qGMZe1wAq_rF6ltMIYt0LRWfXtF7gwLW18QOsYlhuXfZhQ6NH8zscwhdEvLaD3F36dIdoPyE_IoinEfIcyjOtSy4BSjmDH0-pFb4cErw_vSfX78stifl3f_Lj6Oj-_qR3nQpWbEqVx27rOdUCpBNxKp3uHlXZt53qpynYU3FLivmeMdNAB1x13nbBOa3ZSvdtzy8L_NpCyGX1yMAx2grBJhkjMNZP4_0GhlaSaluDHfdDFkFKE3qyjH4sTQ7DZeTYrs5NpdjLNzrM5eDbb8vntYYpNzg59tJPz6UgQnBHKRYl92sfu_QAPTxhgLm8_c60KoN4DfMqwPQJs_GukYkqY2-9XZjHX_M9CX5if7BFg7KFc</recordid><startdate>199106</startdate><enddate>199106</enddate><creator>BERG, MARTIN B.</creator><creator>HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199106</creationdate><title>Secondary production of Chironomidae (Diptera) in a north temperate stream</title><author>BERG, MARTIN B. ; HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chironomidae</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BERG, MARTIN B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BERG, MARTIN B.</au><au>HELLENTHAL, RONALD A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondary production of Chironomidae (Diptera) in a north temperate stream</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>1991-06</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>497-505</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><coden>FWBLAB</coden><abstract>SUMMARY 1. Secondary production of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a third‐order northern Indiana stream was estimated using species‐specific, and in most cases cohort‐specific, life‐history data from the field. 2. Chironomid life‐history patterns were diverse, ranging from one to four generations per year in addition to asynchronous development. Cohort production intervals (CPI) for all taxa ranged from 56 to 266 days. CPI for cohorts of conspecifics differed up to 3‐fold. 3. Annual secondary production was estimated using the instantaneous growth method or the size—frequency method depending on whether cohorts were distinguishable or not. Total annual chironomid production was 29 700 mg dry mass m−2, which is the highest value reported for chironomids from a north temperate stream. 4. Eighty per cent of the total chironomid production was attributed to five species: Diamesa nivoriunda (33.9%), Cricotopus bicinctus (16.6%), Pagastia sp. (10.2%), C. trifascia (9.7%) and Orthodadius obumbratus (9.6%). 5. The annual P:B ratio ranged from 4.7 to 21.9. Thus, high secondary production was due to high mean annual standing stocks and not to rapid biomass turnover.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01392.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-5070
ispartof Freshwater biology, 1991-06, Vol.25 (3), p.497-505
issn 0046-5070
1365-2427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16049360
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Chironomidae
Diptera
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
title Secondary production of Chironomidae (Diptera) in a north temperate stream
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A43%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20production%20of%20Chironomidae%20(Diptera)%20in%20a%20north%20temperate%20stream&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=BERG,%20MARTIN%20B.&rft.date=1991-06&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=497-505&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft.coden=FWBLAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01392.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16049360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-c42179088cbcbe226e086c9fc079c8bcf670002ecd60ff331bebe49b4cb5ac993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15976292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true