Partitioning Internal Variability and Model Uncertainty Components in a Multimember Multimodel Ensemble of Climate Projections

• Published in: Journal of climate 2014-09, Vol.27 (17), p.6779-6798
• Main Authors: Hingray, Benoit, Saïd, Mériem
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Catchment area; Climate; Climate change; Climate models; Climatic zones; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change; Components; Earth, ocean, space; Emissions; Exact sciences and technology; Experiments; External geophysics; Frameworks; Global climate; Global climate models; Greenhouse effect; Lead time; Mathematical models; Meteorology; Modeling; Modelling; Partitioning; Polynomials; Precipitation; Simulations; Statistical analysis; Statistical models; Statistical variance; Temperature; Temperature control; Time series; Uncertainty; Variability; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 0894-8755; 1520-0442
• DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00629.1

A simple and robust framework is proposed for the partitioning of the different components of internal variability and model uncertainty in an unbalanced multimember multimodel ensemble (MM2E) of climate projections obtained for a suite of statistical downscaling models (SDMs) and global climate models (GCMs). It is based on the quasi-ergodic assumption for transient climate simulations. Model uncertainty components are estimated from the noise-free signals of the different modeling chains using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) framework. The residuals from the noise-free signals are used to estimate the large- and small-scale internal variability components associated with each considered GCM–SDM configuration. This framework makes it possible to take into account all members available from any climate ensemble of opportunity. Uncertainty is quantified as a function of lead time for projections of changes in temperature and precipitation produced for a mesoscale alpine catchment. Internal variability accounts for more than 80% of total uncertainty in the first decades. This proportion decreases to less than 10% at the end of the century for temperature but remains greater than 50% for precipitation. Small-scale internal variability is negligible for temperature; however, it is similar to the large-scale component for precipitation, whatever the projection lead time. SDM uncertainty is always greater than GCM uncertainty for precipitation. It is also greater for temperature in the middle of the century. The response-to-uncertainty ratio is very high for temperature. For precipitation, it is always less than one, indicating that even the sign of change is uncertain.