Loading…
Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy
Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with dilation and curettage (D&C) within 24 hours for the treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), compared with methotrexate and D&C. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 119 women with CSP was c...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2014-11, Vol.127 (2), p.147-151 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with dilation and curettage (D&C) within 24 hours for the treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), compared with methotrexate and D&C. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 119 women with CSP was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, China, during 2009–2012. Twenty-six women received systemic methotrexate followed by D&C, and 93 women were treated with UAE followed by D&C within 24 hours. Results Mean blood loss was 261.0 ± 357.4 mL in the methotrexate group versus 14.1 ± 40.6 mL in the UAE group ( P < 0.001). The time to resolution of the level of β-human chorionic gonadotropin was 40.5 ± 17.2 days versus 15.4 ± 7.7 days ( P < 0.001), respectively. The duration of hospitalization was 14.6 ± 9.2 days versus 6.2 ± 3.7 days ( P < 0.001), respectively. An additional intervention was needed in 9 (35%) women in the methotrexate group and in 5 (5%) in the UAE group ( P < 0.001). Conclusion UAE combined with D&C within 24 hours was an effective uterine preservation treatment for CSP, and was associated with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay than administration of methotrexate followed by D&C. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.005 |