Loading…
The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation
Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was teste...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1991-11, Vol.93 (4), p.811-816 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 816 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 811 |
container_title | The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Gloutney, Mark L. Clark, Robert G. |
description | Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3247715 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16127178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3247715</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3247715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqUgfsEDgilgv9pxMkJLoVIrBsocOS92cUnjYidD_55UrRAL09WVjs5wCLnm7B5GTD2MQCjF5QkZ8HyUJZJDfkoGjHGWSAFwTi5iXLP-g4ABWSw_DX13q8ZZh7pBQ72lT77a0YWOkbaeTs1G14ZOdFnWrlnRSYdfkVZd2J-5bg2dNdiVunW-uSRnVtfRXB13SD6mz8vxazJ_e5mNH-cJghBtgghYGpVXKtVS2kyyqgKwDCsLOWSlqdIqF1IBomICU2MBBU8zgSpPdZqPhuT24N0G_92Z2BYbF9HUtW6M72LBUw6Kq6wH7w4gBh9jMLbYBrfRYVdwVuxzFcdcPXlzVOqIurahj-HiLy65zCD_g61j68O_th8rY3MR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16127178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Gloutney, Mark L. ; Clark, Robert G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gloutney, Mark L. ; Clark, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><description>Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3247715</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Clara, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Anas ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Breeding ; Clutch size ; Ducks ; Eggs ; Female animals ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geese ; Incubation ; Nutrient reserves ; Waterfowl</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1991-11, Vol.93 (4), p.811-816</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3247715$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3247715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5158295$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gloutney, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><title>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.</description><subject>Anas</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geese</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Nutrient reserves</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqUgfsEDgilgv9pxMkJLoVIrBsocOS92cUnjYidD_55UrRAL09WVjs5wCLnm7B5GTD2MQCjF5QkZ8HyUJZJDfkoGjHGWSAFwTi5iXLP-g4ABWSw_DX13q8ZZh7pBQ72lT77a0YWOkbaeTs1G14ZOdFnWrlnRSYdfkVZd2J-5bg2dNdiVunW-uSRnVtfRXB13SD6mz8vxazJ_e5mNH-cJghBtgghYGpVXKtVS2kyyqgKwDCsLOWSlqdIqF1IBomICU2MBBU8zgSpPdZqPhuT24N0G_92Z2BYbF9HUtW6M72LBUw6Kq6wH7w4gBh9jMLbYBrfRYVdwVuxzFcdcPXlzVOqIurahj-HiLy65zCD_g61j68O_th8rY3MR</recordid><startdate>19911101</startdate><enddate>19911101</enddate><creator>Gloutney, Mark L.</creator><creator>Clark, Robert G.</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Club</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911101</creationdate><title>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</title><author>Gloutney, Mark L. ; Clark, Robert G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Anas</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geese</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Nutrient reserves</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gloutney, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gloutney, Mark L.</au><au>Clark, Robert G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1991-11-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>811</spage><epage>816</epage><pages>811-816</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.</abstract><cop>Santa Clara, CA</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3247715</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-5422 |
ispartof | The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1991-11, Vol.93 (4), p.811-816 |
issn | 0010-5422 1938-5129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16127178 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Anas Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Breeding Clutch size Ducks Eggs Female animals Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geese Incubation Nutrient reserves Waterfowl |
title | The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A04%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Significance%20of%20Body%20Mass%20to%20Female%20Dabbling%20Ducks%20during%20Late%20Incubation&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Gloutney,%20Mark%20L.&rft.date=1991-11-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=811&rft.epage=816&rft.pages=811-816&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3247715&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3247715%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16127178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3247715&rfr_iscdi=true |