Loading…

The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation

Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was teste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1991-11, Vol.93 (4), p.811-816
Main Authors: Gloutney, Mark L., Clark, Robert G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693
cites
container_end_page 816
container_issue 4
container_start_page 811
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 93
creator Gloutney, Mark L.
Clark, Robert G.
description Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3247715
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16127178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3247715</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3247715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqUgfsEDgilgv9pxMkJLoVIrBsocOS92cUnjYidD_55UrRAL09WVjs5wCLnm7B5GTD2MQCjF5QkZ8HyUJZJDfkoGjHGWSAFwTi5iXLP-g4ABWSw_DX13q8ZZh7pBQ72lT77a0YWOkbaeTs1G14ZOdFnWrlnRSYdfkVZd2J-5bg2dNdiVunW-uSRnVtfRXB13SD6mz8vxazJ_e5mNH-cJghBtgghYGpVXKtVS2kyyqgKwDCsLOWSlqdIqF1IBomICU2MBBU8zgSpPdZqPhuT24N0G_92Z2BYbF9HUtW6M72LBUw6Kq6wH7w4gBh9jMLbYBrfRYVdwVuxzFcdcPXlzVOqIurahj-HiLy65zCD_g61j68O_th8rY3MR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16127178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Gloutney, Mark L. ; Clark, Robert G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gloutney, Mark L. ; Clark, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><description>Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3247715</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Clara, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Anas ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Breeding ; Clutch size ; Ducks ; Eggs ; Female animals ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geese ; Incubation ; Nutrient reserves ; Waterfowl</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1991-11, Vol.93 (4), p.811-816</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3247715$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3247715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5158295$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gloutney, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><title>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.</description><subject>Anas</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geese</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Nutrient reserves</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EEqUgfsEDgilgv9pxMkJLoVIrBsocOS92cUnjYidD_55UrRAL09WVjs5wCLnm7B5GTD2MQCjF5QkZ8HyUJZJDfkoGjHGWSAFwTi5iXLP-g4ABWSw_DX13q8ZZh7pBQ72lT77a0YWOkbaeTs1G14ZOdFnWrlnRSYdfkVZd2J-5bg2dNdiVunW-uSRnVtfRXB13SD6mz8vxazJ_e5mNH-cJghBtgghYGpVXKtVS2kyyqgKwDCsLOWSlqdIqF1IBomICU2MBBU8zgSpPdZqPhuT24N0G_92Z2BYbF9HUtW6M72LBUw6Kq6wH7w4gBh9jMLbYBrfRYVdwVuxzFcdcPXlzVOqIurahj-HiLy65zCD_g61j68O_th8rY3MR</recordid><startdate>19911101</startdate><enddate>19911101</enddate><creator>Gloutney, Mark L.</creator><creator>Clark, Robert G.</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Club</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911101</creationdate><title>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</title><author>Gloutney, Mark L. ; Clark, Robert G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Anas</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geese</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Nutrient reserves</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gloutney, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gloutney, Mark L.</au><au>Clark, Robert G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1991-11-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>811</spage><epage>816</epage><pages>811-816</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>Allocation of nutrients to eggs and to costs of incubation in waterfowl may be constrained by the need to maintain nutrient reserves to complete incubation. This hypothesis predicts that body mass of successfully nesting females is greater than that of unsuccessful females. This prediction was tested by comparing the body masses of successful and unsuccessful female dabbling ducks captured late in incubation. Successful Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and Northern Shovelers (A. clypeata) were significantly heavier than unsuccessful females, and this process constituted evidence of directional selection. Body masses of successful and unsuccessful Blue-winged Teal (A. discors) did not differ. We calculated residual (observed-predicted) body masses using published regression equations relating mass and stage of incubation in independent samples of shovelers and teal to test whether successful females in our study were relatively heavy. Residual body mass estimates of successful shovelers were significantly greater than those of unsuccessful ones; in teal, no relationship was found. Nutrient reserves may influence successful incubation in some prairie-nesting ducks and the relationship may be stronger in larger species that are most capable of storing nutrients.</abstract><cop>Santa Clara, CA</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3247715</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1991-11, Vol.93 (4), p.811-816
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16127178
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Anas
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Breeding
Clutch size
Ducks
Eggs
Female animals
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geese
Incubation
Nutrient reserves
Waterfowl
title The Significance of Body Mass to Female Dabbling Ducks during Late Incubation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A04%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Significance%20of%20Body%20Mass%20to%20Female%20Dabbling%20Ducks%20during%20Late%20Incubation&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Gloutney,%20Mark%20L.&rft.date=1991-11-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=811&rft.epage=816&rft.pages=811-816&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3247715&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3247715%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-cc2cbe79d76a55f850dd22f0cdf2928bed6d94572cc704c6ef2c41684c796a693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16127178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3247715&rfr_iscdi=true