Institutionalising cost sharing for catchment management: lessons from land and water management planning in Australia

A recurring theme in recent Australian reports on integrated catchment management (ICM) has been the need to institutionalise more formally the cost-sharing commitments made within this domain. This represents a significant departure from earlier visions of ICM as essentially promoting voluntary upt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water science and technology 2002-01, Vol.45 (11), p.101-111
Main Author: MARSHALL, G. R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptive management
Australia
Australia, New South Wales, Deniliquin, Murray R
Case studies
Catchment area
Community-Institutional Relations
Cost Sharing
Costs
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Enforcement
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environment
Environmental Monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
Feasibility studies
Freshwater
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Irrigation districts
Management planning
Policies
Policy Making
Pollution, environment geology
Resource conservation
Uptake
Water management
Water Supply - economics
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A recurring theme in recent Australian reports on integrated catchment management (ICM) has been the need to institutionalise more formally the cost-sharing commitments made within this domain. This represents a significant departure from earlier visions of ICM as essentially promoting voluntary uptake of resource-conservation measures. Two important questions raised by this nascent policy shift are addressed in this paper. Firstly, how might cost-sharing arrangements be given greater formality without undermining the efforts of ICM to increase the preparedness of civil stakeholders to voluntarily, or informally, accept responsibility for sharing costs? Secondly, how is it possible to formalise cost-sharing arrangements so that the transaction costs of enforcing compliance with them remain affordable? Answers to these questions are explored through a case study of the Land and Water Management Planning Program now being successfully implemented in the irrigation districts of the central-Murray region of southern inland New South Wales (NSW) surrounding Deniliquin. The sophisticated system of institutional arrangements introduced in the program to facilitate monitoring, enforcement and adaptive management of cost-sharing commitments is discussed, and insights into how informally motivated cooperation can enhance the affordability and political feasibility of formal arrangements are presented.
ISSN:0273-1223
1996-9732
DOI:10.2166/wst.2002.0385