Loading…

Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed

Efficient operation of the reverse osmosis (RO) process for desalination of brackish water requires the reduction of silica in feed water to safe levels in order to avoid scale formation. After extensive jar testing, two pilot plants which represent the chemical clarification — media filtration RO p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Desalination 2003-09, Vol.159 (1), p.21-31
Main Author: Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Desalination
container_volume 159
creator Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.
description Efficient operation of the reverse osmosis (RO) process for desalination of brackish water requires the reduction of silica in feed water to safe levels in order to avoid scale formation. After extensive jar testing, two pilot plants which represent the chemical clarification — media filtration RO pretreatment processes at two major treatment plants in Saudi Arabia were constructed and operated on selected variable chemical combinations and dosing rates. The aim was to reduce silica concentration from the two deep well groundwater sources, of different silica content, to the acceptable levels of RO feed water (silica removal >23% for one source and >48% for the other source). For the low silica water source, the dose combination of lime (110 mg/L), soda ash (220 mg/L) and alum (30 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; while using caustic soda alone required a dosage of 125 mg/L for the same level of silica removal. For the high silica water source, the dose combination of lime (90 mg/L),soda ash (300 mg/L), sodium aluminate (25 mg/L) and anionic polymer (0.05 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; a dosage of 175 mg/L caustic soda alone was adequate for the same level of silica removal. The use of caustic soda (NaOH) as a single chemical was found a viable alternative to the lime-soda precipitation aid process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90042-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16166910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011916403900427</els_id><sourcerecordid>16166910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_gpCT6GE106RJ9iRS_AKx4Mc5hOxEI7ubmmwr_vemrXj1NPPg9x4zj5BjYOfAQF48MwZQ1SDFKeNnNWNiUqkdMgKteCWEFLtk9Ifsk4OcP4qc1JyPyOMsdgub7BBWSN07dsHZlrrWpuDLOoTYUx8TzaEtkibs4qoAPsWOPs3pW4rLvvmyAybqEZtDsudtm_Hod47J6831y-yuepjf3s-uHirHuR4q78ABSqecsLYRtdBKCwvCa69BMSUdNqpRlkmrUE8dZxxBcGGnDJmugY_JyTZ3keLnEvNgupAdtq3tMS6zAQlS1sAKON2CLsWcE3qzSKGz6dsAM-v2zKY9s67GMG427RlVfJdbH5YvVgGTyS5gX-4KCd1gmhj-SfgBebZ3AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16166910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</creatorcontrib><description>Efficient operation of the reverse osmosis (RO) process for desalination of brackish water requires the reduction of silica in feed water to safe levels in order to avoid scale formation. After extensive jar testing, two pilot plants which represent the chemical clarification — media filtration RO pretreatment processes at two major treatment plants in Saudi Arabia were constructed and operated on selected variable chemical combinations and dosing rates. The aim was to reduce silica concentration from the two deep well groundwater sources, of different silica content, to the acceptable levels of RO feed water (silica removal &gt;23% for one source and &gt;48% for the other source). For the low silica water source, the dose combination of lime (110 mg/L), soda ash (220 mg/L) and alum (30 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; while using caustic soda alone required a dosage of 125 mg/L for the same level of silica removal. For the high silica water source, the dose combination of lime (90 mg/L),soda ash (300 mg/L), sodium aluminate (25 mg/L) and anionic polymer (0.05 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; a dosage of 175 mg/L caustic soda alone was adequate for the same level of silica removal. The use of caustic soda (NaOH) as a single chemical was found a viable alternative to the lime-soda precipitation aid process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-9164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90042-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chemical clarification ; Groundwater ; Reverse osmosis ; Silica removal</subject><ispartof>Desalination, 2003-09, Vol.159 (1), p.21-31</ispartof><rights>2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed</title><title>Desalination</title><description>Efficient operation of the reverse osmosis (RO) process for desalination of brackish water requires the reduction of silica in feed water to safe levels in order to avoid scale formation. After extensive jar testing, two pilot plants which represent the chemical clarification — media filtration RO pretreatment processes at two major treatment plants in Saudi Arabia were constructed and operated on selected variable chemical combinations and dosing rates. The aim was to reduce silica concentration from the two deep well groundwater sources, of different silica content, to the acceptable levels of RO feed water (silica removal &gt;23% for one source and &gt;48% for the other source). For the low silica water source, the dose combination of lime (110 mg/L), soda ash (220 mg/L) and alum (30 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; while using caustic soda alone required a dosage of 125 mg/L for the same level of silica removal. For the high silica water source, the dose combination of lime (90 mg/L),soda ash (300 mg/L), sodium aluminate (25 mg/L) and anionic polymer (0.05 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; a dosage of 175 mg/L caustic soda alone was adequate for the same level of silica removal. The use of caustic soda (NaOH) as a single chemical was found a viable alternative to the lime-soda precipitation aid process.</description><subject>Chemical clarification</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Reverse osmosis</subject><subject>Silica removal</subject><issn>0011-9164</issn><issn>1873-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_gpCT6GE106RJ9iRS_AKx4Mc5hOxEI7ubmmwr_vemrXj1NPPg9x4zj5BjYOfAQF48MwZQ1SDFKeNnNWNiUqkdMgKteCWEFLtk9Ifsk4OcP4qc1JyPyOMsdgub7BBWSN07dsHZlrrWpuDLOoTYUx8TzaEtkibs4qoAPsWOPs3pW4rLvvmyAybqEZtDsudtm_Hod47J6831y-yuepjf3s-uHirHuR4q78ABSqecsLYRtdBKCwvCa69BMSUdNqpRlkmrUE8dZxxBcGGnDJmugY_JyTZ3keLnEvNgupAdtq3tMS6zAQlS1sAKON2CLsWcE3qzSKGz6dsAM-v2zKY9s67GMG427RlVfJdbH5YvVgGTyS5gX-4KCd1gmhj-SfgBebZ3AQ</recordid><startdate>20030915</startdate><enddate>20030915</enddate><creator>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030915</creationdate><title>Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed</title><author>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Chemical clarification</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Reverse osmosis</topic><topic>Silica removal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Desalination</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Rehaili, Abdullah M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed</atitle><jtitle>Desalination</jtitle><date>2003-09-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>21-31</pages><issn>0011-9164</issn><eissn>1873-4464</eissn><abstract>Efficient operation of the reverse osmosis (RO) process for desalination of brackish water requires the reduction of silica in feed water to safe levels in order to avoid scale formation. After extensive jar testing, two pilot plants which represent the chemical clarification — media filtration RO pretreatment processes at two major treatment plants in Saudi Arabia were constructed and operated on selected variable chemical combinations and dosing rates. The aim was to reduce silica concentration from the two deep well groundwater sources, of different silica content, to the acceptable levels of RO feed water (silica removal &gt;23% for one source and &gt;48% for the other source). For the low silica water source, the dose combination of lime (110 mg/L), soda ash (220 mg/L) and alum (30 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; while using caustic soda alone required a dosage of 125 mg/L for the same level of silica removal. For the high silica water source, the dose combination of lime (90 mg/L),soda ash (300 mg/L), sodium aluminate (25 mg/L) and anionic polymer (0.05 mg/L) was adequate for silica control; a dosage of 175 mg/L caustic soda alone was adequate for the same level of silica removal. The use of caustic soda (NaOH) as a single chemical was found a viable alternative to the lime-soda precipitation aid process.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90042-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-9164
ispartof Desalination, 2003-09, Vol.159 (1), p.21-31
issn 0011-9164
1873-4464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16166910
source Elsevier
subjects Chemical clarification
Groundwater
Reverse osmosis
Silica removal
title Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A32%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20chemical%20clarification%20for%20silica%20removal%20from%20RO%20groundwater%20feed&rft.jtitle=Desalination&rft.au=Al-Rehaili,%20Abdullah%20M.&rft.date=2003-09-15&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=21-31&rft.issn=0011-9164&rft.eissn=1873-4464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90042-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16166910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fc1c1e6c7c4aad4948784a14f8f817076ced7d7a06a7e85c303e1434a50e08913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16166910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true