Loading…

Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater

Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.727-735
Main Authors: Hunt, Patrick G, Matheny, Terry A, Szogi, Ariel A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03
cites
container_end_page 735
container_issue 2
container_start_page 727
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 32
creator Hunt, Patrick G
Matheny, Terry A
Szogi, Ariel A
description Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz & R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 >or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2003.0727
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16170157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16170157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctrXCEUB2AJLckkzS7r5hJoV530qFe9LkOaPiC0izZrcbzH4jCjiXoZ-t_HYS4EsunGB3w-zvkRckHhmlHef17jEwPg16CYOiILKrhasja8IQuAvq17Jk7IaSlrAMpAyWNyQpmCQephQX5-wRhqDj44W0OKXYidS7HUPLmKY7fDurFxLN1U2s6n3NWMtm4x1i75ruxCxG5nS8WdrZjfkbfebgqez_MZefh69-f2-_L-17cftzf3S8d1X5fM61Fot6LCsUHDYEFrLSRIHL2VyumV8jBoSZkEwQcxSIVCcdZDKxkQ-Bn5eLj3MaenCUs121AcbtpfMU3FUEkV0Hbkv7CXQmi5h1ev4DpNObYiDNWKD0qwvqFPB-RyKiWjN485bG3-ZyiYfRpmTsPs02j8_XzntNri-ILn9jfwYQa2OLvx2UYXyovrJW2P793lwXmbjP2bm3n4zaD1osUtueb8GdV5mX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197387524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hunt, Patrick G ; Matheny, Terry A ; Szogi, Ariel A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Patrick G ; Matheny, Terry A ; Szogi, Ariel A</creatorcontrib><description>Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz &amp; R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 &gt;or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.0727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12708698</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>acetylene ; animal manure management ; Animal wastes ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Aquatic plants ; Artificial wetlands ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; carbon ; constructed wetlands ; Denitrification ; Ecosystem ; Environment and pollution ; Enzymatic activity ; enzyme activity ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Juncus effusus ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Other wastewaters ; pig manure ; Plant communities ; Poaceae ; Pollution ; pollution load ; Schoenoplectus ; Schoenoplectus americanus ; Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani ; Scirpus ; Scirpus cyperinus ; Sparganium ; Sparganium americanum ; Swine ; Typha angustifolia ; Typha latifolia ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water depth ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution ; wetland plants ; wetland soils</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.727-735</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14611978$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12708698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Patrick G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheny, Terry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szogi, Ariel A</creatorcontrib><title>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz &amp; R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 &gt;or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.</description><subject>acetylene</subject><subject>animal manure management</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>constructed wetlands</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>enzyme activity</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Juncus effusus</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Other wastewaters</subject><subject>pig manure</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution load</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus americanus</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani</subject><subject>Scirpus</subject><subject>Scirpus cyperinus</subject><subject>Sparganium</subject><subject>Sparganium americanum</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Typha angustifolia</subject><subject>Typha latifolia</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>wetland plants</subject><subject>wetland soils</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0ctrXCEUB2AJLckkzS7r5hJoV530qFe9LkOaPiC0izZrcbzH4jCjiXoZ-t_HYS4EsunGB3w-zvkRckHhmlHef17jEwPg16CYOiILKrhasja8IQuAvq17Jk7IaSlrAMpAyWNyQpmCQephQX5-wRhqDj44W0OKXYidS7HUPLmKY7fDurFxLN1U2s6n3NWMtm4x1i75ruxCxG5nS8WdrZjfkbfebgqez_MZefh69-f2-_L-17cftzf3S8d1X5fM61Fot6LCsUHDYEFrLSRIHL2VyumV8jBoSZkEwQcxSIVCcdZDKxkQ-Bn5eLj3MaenCUs121AcbtpfMU3FUEkV0Hbkv7CXQmi5h1ev4DpNObYiDNWKD0qwvqFPB-RyKiWjN485bG3-ZyiYfRpmTsPs02j8_XzntNri-ILn9jfwYQa2OLvx2UYXyovrJW2P793lwXmbjP2bm3n4zaD1osUtueb8GdV5mX4</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Hunt, Patrick G</creator><creator>Matheny, Terry A</creator><creator>Szogi, Ariel A</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</title><author>Hunt, Patrick G ; Matheny, Terry A ; Szogi, Ariel A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>acetylene</topic><topic>animal manure management</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>constructed wetlands</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>enzyme activity</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Juncus effusus</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Other wastewaters</topic><topic>pig manure</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution load</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus americanus</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani</topic><topic>Scirpus</topic><topic>Scirpus cyperinus</topic><topic>Sparganium</topic><topic>Sparganium americanum</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Typha angustifolia</topic><topic>Typha latifolia</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>wetland plants</topic><topic>wetland soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Patrick G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheny, Terry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szogi, Ariel A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Patrick G</au><au>Matheny, Terry A</au><au>Szogi, Ariel A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>727-735</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz &amp; R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 &gt;or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><pmid>12708698</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2003.0727</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.727-735
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16170157
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects acetylene
animal manure management
Animal wastes
Animals
Applied sciences
Aquatic plants
Artificial wetlands
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biological and medical sciences
Biological treatment of waters
Biotechnology
carbon
constructed wetlands
Denitrification
Ecosystem
Environment and pollution
Enzymatic activity
enzyme activity
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
Juncus effusus
nitrogen
Nitrogen - metabolism
Other wastewaters
pig manure
Plant communities
Poaceae
Pollution
pollution load
Schoenoplectus
Schoenoplectus americanus
Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani
Scirpus
Scirpus cyperinus
Sparganium
Sparganium americanum
Swine
Typha angustifolia
Typha latifolia
Waste Disposal, Fluid
wastewater treatment
Wastewaters
Water depth
Water Purification - methods
Water treatment and pollution
wetland plants
wetland soils
title Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A17%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Denitrification%20in%20constructed%20wetlands%20used%20for%20treatment%20of%20swine%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Hunt,%20Patrick%20G&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=727-735&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2003.0727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16170157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197387524&rft_id=info:pmid/12708698&rfr_iscdi=true