Loading…
Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater
Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental quality 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.727-735 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 735 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 727 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Hunt, Patrick G Matheny, Terry A Szogi, Ariel A |
description | Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz & R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 >or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2003.0727 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16170157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16170157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctrXCEUB2AJLckkzS7r5hJoV530qFe9LkOaPiC0izZrcbzH4jCjiXoZ-t_HYS4EsunGB3w-zvkRckHhmlHef17jEwPg16CYOiILKrhasja8IQuAvq17Jk7IaSlrAMpAyWNyQpmCQephQX5-wRhqDj44W0OKXYidS7HUPLmKY7fDurFxLN1U2s6n3NWMtm4x1i75ruxCxG5nS8WdrZjfkbfebgqez_MZefh69-f2-_L-17cftzf3S8d1X5fM61Fot6LCsUHDYEFrLSRIHL2VyumV8jBoSZkEwQcxSIVCcdZDKxkQ-Bn5eLj3MaenCUs121AcbtpfMU3FUEkV0Hbkv7CXQmi5h1ev4DpNObYiDNWKD0qwvqFPB-RyKiWjN485bG3-ZyiYfRpmTsPs02j8_XzntNri-ILn9jfwYQa2OLvx2UYXyovrJW2P793lwXmbjP2bm3n4zaD1osUtueb8GdV5mX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197387524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Hunt, Patrick G ; Matheny, Terry A ; Szogi, Ariel A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Patrick G ; Matheny, Terry A ; Szogi, Ariel A</creatorcontrib><description>Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz & R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 >or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.0727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12708698</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>acetylene ; animal manure management ; Animal wastes ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Aquatic plants ; Artificial wetlands ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; carbon ; constructed wetlands ; Denitrification ; Ecosystem ; Environment and pollution ; Enzymatic activity ; enzyme activity ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Juncus effusus ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Other wastewaters ; pig manure ; Plant communities ; Poaceae ; Pollution ; pollution load ; Schoenoplectus ; Schoenoplectus americanus ; Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani ; Scirpus ; Scirpus cyperinus ; Sparganium ; Sparganium americanum ; Swine ; Typha angustifolia ; Typha latifolia ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water depth ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment and pollution ; wetland plants ; wetland soils</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.727-735</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14611978$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12708698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Patrick G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheny, Terry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szogi, Ariel A</creatorcontrib><title>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz & R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 >or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.</description><subject>acetylene</subject><subject>animal manure management</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>constructed wetlands</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>enzyme activity</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Juncus effusus</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Other wastewaters</subject><subject>pig manure</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution load</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus americanus</subject><subject>Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani</subject><subject>Scirpus</subject><subject>Scirpus cyperinus</subject><subject>Sparganium</subject><subject>Sparganium americanum</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Typha angustifolia</subject><subject>Typha latifolia</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>wetland plants</subject><subject>wetland soils</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0ctrXCEUB2AJLckkzS7r5hJoV530qFe9LkOaPiC0izZrcbzH4jCjiXoZ-t_HYS4EsunGB3w-zvkRckHhmlHef17jEwPg16CYOiILKrhasja8IQuAvq17Jk7IaSlrAMpAyWNyQpmCQephQX5-wRhqDj44W0OKXYidS7HUPLmKY7fDurFxLN1U2s6n3NWMtm4x1i75ruxCxG5nS8WdrZjfkbfebgqez_MZefh69-f2-_L-17cftzf3S8d1X5fM61Fot6LCsUHDYEFrLSRIHL2VyumV8jBoSZkEwQcxSIVCcdZDKxkQ-Bn5eLj3MaenCUs121AcbtpfMU3FUEkV0Hbkv7CXQmi5h1ev4DpNObYiDNWKD0qwvqFPB-RyKiWjN485bG3-ZyiYfRpmTsPs02j8_XzntNri-ILn9jfwYQa2OLvx2UYXyovrJW2P793lwXmbjP2bm3n4zaD1osUtueb8GdV5mX4</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Hunt, Patrick G</creator><creator>Matheny, Terry A</creator><creator>Szogi, Ariel A</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</title><author>Hunt, Patrick G ; Matheny, Terry A ; Szogi, Ariel A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>acetylene</topic><topic>animal manure management</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>constructed wetlands</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>enzyme activity</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Juncus effusus</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Other wastewaters</topic><topic>pig manure</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution load</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus americanus</topic><topic>Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani</topic><topic>Scirpus</topic><topic>Scirpus cyperinus</topic><topic>Sparganium</topic><topic>Sparganium americanum</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Typha angustifolia</topic><topic>Typha latifolia</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>wetland plants</topic><topic>wetland soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Patrick G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheny, Terry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szogi, Ariel A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Patrick G</au><au>Matheny, Terry A</au><au>Szogi, Ariel A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>727-735</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Constructed wetland treatment of swine wastewater probably involves substantial denitrification. Our objective was to assess denitrification and denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) in such wetlands in relation to plant communities, N loading, carbon or nitrogen limitations, and water depth. Two wetland cells each 3.6 m wide and 33.5 m long were connected in series. One set of cells was planted with rushes and bulrushes, including soft rush (Juncus effusus L.), softstem bulrush [Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (K.C. Gmel.) Palla], American bulrush [Schoenoplectus americanus (Pers.) Volkart ex Schinz & R. Keller], and woolgrass bulrush [Scirpus cyperinus (L.) Kunth]. Another set was planted with bur-reeds and cattails, including American bur-reed (Sparganium americanum Nutt.), broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia L.), and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia L.). The sets will be referred to herein as bulrush and cattail wetlands, respectively. Denitrification and DEA were measured via the acetylene inhibition method in intact soil cores and disturbed soil samples that were taken during four years (1994-1997). Although DEA in the disturbed samples was greater than denitrification in the core samples, the measurements were highly correlated (r2 >or= 0.82). The DEA was greater in the bulrush wetlands than the cattail wetlands, 0.516 and 0.210 mg N kg-1 soil h-1, respectively; and it increased with the cumulative applied N. The DEA mean was equivalent to 9.55 kg N ha-1 d-1 in the bulrush wetlands. We hypothesized and confirmed that DEA was generally limited by nitrate rather than carbon. Moreover, we determined that one of the most influential factors in DEA was wetland water depth. In bulrush wetlands, the slope and r2 values of the control treatment were -0.013 mg N kg-1 soil h-1 mm-1 depth and r2 = 0.89, respectively. Results of this investigation indicate that DEA can be very significant in constructed wetlands used to treat swine wastewater.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><pmid>12708698</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2003.0727</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.727-735 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16170157 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | acetylene animal manure management Animal wastes Animals Applied sciences Aquatic plants Artificial wetlands Biodegradation, Environmental Biological and medical sciences Biological treatment of waters Biotechnology carbon constructed wetlands Denitrification Ecosystem Environment and pollution Enzymatic activity enzyme activity Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects Juncus effusus nitrogen Nitrogen - metabolism Other wastewaters pig manure Plant communities Poaceae Pollution pollution load Schoenoplectus Schoenoplectus americanus Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Scirpus Scirpus cyperinus Sparganium Sparganium americanum Swine Typha angustifolia Typha latifolia Waste Disposal, Fluid wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water depth Water Purification - methods Water treatment and pollution wetland plants wetland soils |
title | Denitrification in constructed wetlands used for treatment of swine wastewater |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A17%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Denitrification%20in%20constructed%20wetlands%20used%20for%20treatment%20of%20swine%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Hunt,%20Patrick%20G&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=727-735&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2003.0727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16170157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2f9d59cb15c28908a09995606edfa67c9b7f089612605385867e5732402130e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197387524&rft_id=info:pmid/12708698&rfr_iscdi=true |