Experimental assessment of Owen's second hypothesis on surface shear stress induced by a fluid during sediment saltation

• Published in: Geophysical research letters 2014-09, Vol.41 (17), p.6298-6305
• Main Authors: Walter, B., Horender, S., Voegeli, C., Lehning, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Approximation; boundary layer flow; Computational fluid dynamics; Drift; Erosion; Fluid flow; Fluids; Fluxes; Hypotheses; Irwin sensors; Mass; Mass flux; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Mechanical stimuli; Meteorology; Particle mass; particle-flow interaction; Saltation; Sand; Sediment; sediment erosion; Sediments; Shear; Shear stress; surface shear stress; Velocity; Wind speed; Wind tunnels; Wind velocities
• ISSN: 0094-8276; 1944-8007
• DOI: 10.1002/2014GL061069

A widely used, yet thus far unproven, fluid dynamical hypothesis originally presented by P. R. Owen 50 years ago, states that the surface shear stress induced by a fluid on the ground during equilibrium sediment saltation is constant and independent of the magnitude of the fluid velocity and consequently the particle mass flux. This hypothesis is one of the key elements in almost all current model descriptions of sediment erosion. We measured the surface shear stress in a drifting‐sand wind tunnel and found Owen's hypothesis being merely an approximation of the real situation. A significant decrease of the fluid stress with increasing wind velocities was measured for low to intermediate particle mass fluxes. For high particle mass fluxes, Owen's hypothesis essentially holds, although a slight increase of the fluid stress was measured. Key Points Owen's second hypothesis is merely an approximation of the real situationThe shear stress decreases for low to intermediate particle mass fluxesFor high particle mass fluxes, Owen's hypothesis essentially holds