Programmed method: developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets

• Published in: Aslib journal of information management 2014-01, Vol.66 (3), p.262-278
• Main Authors: Borra, Erik, Rieder, Bernhard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Archives & records; Big Data; Blogs; Coding; Computation; Computer programs; Data analysis; Data capture; Data collection; Debates; Design engineering; Digital; Epistemology; Ethics; Exact sciences and technology; General aspects; Hand tools; Humanities; Information and communication sciences; Information behaviour & retrieval; Information science. Documentation; Knowledge management; Library & information science; Mathematical analysis; Methodology; Methods; Research methods; Researchers; Sciences and techniques of general use; Social networks; Social sciences; Software; Source code; Technical papers
• ISSN: 2050-3806; 0001-253X; 1758-3748
• DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce Digital Methods Initiative Twitter Capture and Analysis Toolset, a toolset for capturing and analyzing Twitter data. Instead of just presenting a technical paper detailing the system, however, the authors argue that the type of data used for, as well as the methods encoded in, computational systems have epistemological repercussions for research. The authors thus aim at situating the development of the toolset in relation to methodological debates in the social sciences and humanities. Design/methodology/approach – The authors review the possibilities and limitations of existing approaches to capture and analyze Twitter data in order to address the various ways in which computational systems frame research. The authors then introduce the open-source toolset and put forward an approach that embraces methodological diversity and epistemological plurality. Findings – The authors find that design decisions and more general methodological reasoning can and should go hand in hand when building tools for computational social science or digital humanities. Practical implications – Besides methodological transparency, the software provides robust and reproducible data capture and analysis, and interlinks with existing analytical software. Epistemic plurality is emphasized by taking into account how Twitter structures information, by allowing for a number of different sampling techniques, by enabling a variety of analytical approaches or paradigms, and by facilitating work at the micro, meso, and macro levels. Originality/value – The paper opens up critical debate by connecting tool design to fundamental interrogations of methodology and its repercussions for the production of knowledge. The design of the software is inspired by exchanges and debates with scholars from a variety of disciplines and the attempt to propose a flexible and extensible tool that accommodates a wide array of methodological approaches is directly motivated by the desire to keep computational work open for various epistemic sensibilities.