Loading…

ERG expression in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: comparison with adjacent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a growth pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma that has not been well characterized from the molecular standpoint. It remains debatable whether intraductal carcinoma of the prostate represents colonization of benign glands by pre-existing conventional prostatic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modern pathology 2014-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1174-1178
Main Authors: Schneider, Thomas M, Osunkoya, Adeboye O
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73
container_end_page 1178
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1174
container_title Modern pathology
container_volume 27
creator Schneider, Thomas M
Osunkoya, Adeboye O
description Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a growth pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma that has not been well characterized from the molecular standpoint. It remains debatable whether intraductal carcinoma of the prostate represents colonization of benign glands by pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, or progression of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. TMPRSS2-ERG is the most common gene fusion in conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, identified in about 40–70% of cases. In this study, we compared the expression of ERG in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Thirty-one confirmed cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, with adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and available tissue blocks, were identified at our institution. Immunohistochemical stains were performed for ERG using a rabbit anti-ERG monoclonal antibody. The ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component was compared with that in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mean patient age was 65 years (range: 48–79 years). Positive ERG expression was identified in 11/31 (35%) cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. In all 11/11 (100%) cases with positive ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG expression was also positive in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. In the 20/31 cases with negative ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG was also negative in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. It is highly conceivable that based on the identical ERG expression (positive or negative) in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate most likely represents colonization of benign glands by adjacent pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/modpathol.2013.248
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622605215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0893395222019007</els_id><sourcerecordid>1551018843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6BXyQgi--dMzNnzYVX2RZV2FBEH0ut-mtk6FtapKO-u3NMOsgPqwQyMP9nZObcxh7DnwLXJrXk-8XTDs_bgUHuRXKPGAb0JKXXBj9kG24aWQpGy0u2JMY95yD0kY8ZhdCKV6ZSm9YvP58U9DPJVCMzs-FO54UsF9twrGwGKyb_YSFH4q0o2IJPiZM9KawflowuJhFP1zaFdjv0dKcsv6A0R3OrLN5RrM_ez1ljwYcIz27uy_Z1_fXX64-lLefbj5evbstra51KvPyGkkNiECg6lpI2fTQVx0XuhHAqeNSg-K6azTvOujqpqmlqu0AaCqs5SV7dfLNi3xfKaZ2ctHSOOJMfo0tVEJUXIsc2X9RrYGDMUpm9OU_6N6vYc4fOVIcoAEJmRInyuYQYqChXYKbMPxqgbfH9tpze-2xvTa3l0Uv7qzXbqL-LPlTVwbkCYh5NH-j8Nfb99m-Pakoh31wWRWto9lS7wLZ1Pbe3Sf_Dek_vqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1550119131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ERG expression in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: comparison with adjacent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma</title><source>Nature</source><creator>Schneider, Thomas M ; Osunkoya, Adeboye O</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Thomas M ; Osunkoya, Adeboye O</creatorcontrib><description>Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a growth pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma that has not been well characterized from the molecular standpoint. It remains debatable whether intraductal carcinoma of the prostate represents colonization of benign glands by pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, or progression of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. TMPRSS2-ERG is the most common gene fusion in conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, identified in about 40–70% of cases. In this study, we compared the expression of ERG in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Thirty-one confirmed cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, with adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and available tissue blocks, were identified at our institution. Immunohistochemical stains were performed for ERG using a rabbit anti-ERG monoclonal antibody. The ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component was compared with that in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mean patient age was 65 years (range: 48–79 years). Positive ERG expression was identified in 11/31 (35%) cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. In all 11/11 (100%) cases with positive ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG expression was also positive in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. In the 20/31 cases with negative ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG was also negative in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. It is highly conceivable that based on the identical ERG expression (positive or negative) in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate most likely represents colonization of benign glands by adjacent pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.248</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24406865</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MODPEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>631/67/68 ; 692/699/67/589/466 ; 692/700/139/422 ; Adenocarcinoma - chemistry ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biopsy ; Carcinoma, Ductal - chemistry ; Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology ; ERG ; high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; intraductal carcinoma ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; original-article ; Pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - chemistry ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; TMPRSS2-ERG ; Trans-Activators - analysis ; Transcriptional Regulator ERG</subject><ispartof>Modern pathology, 2014-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1174-1178</ispartof><rights>2014 United States &amp; Canadian Academy of Pathology</rights><rights>United States &amp; Canadian Academy of Pathology 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osunkoya, Adeboye O</creatorcontrib><title>ERG expression in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: comparison with adjacent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma</title><title>Modern pathology</title><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><description>Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a growth pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma that has not been well characterized from the molecular standpoint. It remains debatable whether intraductal carcinoma of the prostate represents colonization of benign glands by pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, or progression of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. TMPRSS2-ERG is the most common gene fusion in conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, identified in about 40–70% of cases. In this study, we compared the expression of ERG in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Thirty-one confirmed cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, with adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and available tissue blocks, were identified at our institution. Immunohistochemical stains were performed for ERG using a rabbit anti-ERG monoclonal antibody. The ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component was compared with that in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mean patient age was 65 years (range: 48–79 years). Positive ERG expression was identified in 11/31 (35%) cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. In all 11/11 (100%) cases with positive ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG expression was also positive in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. In the 20/31 cases with negative ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG was also negative in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. It is highly conceivable that based on the identical ERG expression (positive or negative) in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate most likely represents colonization of benign glands by adjacent pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.</description><subject>631/67/68</subject><subject>692/699/67/589/466</subject><subject>692/700/139/422</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - chemistry</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal - chemistry</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology</subject><subject>ERG</subject><subject>high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>intraductal carcinoma</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - chemistry</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>TMPRSS2-ERG</subject><subject>Trans-Activators - analysis</subject><subject>Transcriptional Regulator ERG</subject><issn>0893-3952</issn><issn>1530-0285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6BXyQgi--dMzNnzYVX2RZV2FBEH0ut-mtk6FtapKO-u3NMOsgPqwQyMP9nZObcxh7DnwLXJrXk-8XTDs_bgUHuRXKPGAb0JKXXBj9kG24aWQpGy0u2JMY95yD0kY8ZhdCKV6ZSm9YvP58U9DPJVCMzs-FO54UsF9twrGwGKyb_YSFH4q0o2IJPiZM9KawflowuJhFP1zaFdjv0dKcsv6A0R3OrLN5RrM_ez1ljwYcIz27uy_Z1_fXX64-lLefbj5evbstra51KvPyGkkNiECg6lpI2fTQVx0XuhHAqeNSg-K6azTvOujqpqmlqu0AaCqs5SV7dfLNi3xfKaZ2ctHSOOJMfo0tVEJUXIsc2X9RrYGDMUpm9OU_6N6vYc4fOVIcoAEJmRInyuYQYqChXYKbMPxqgbfH9tpze-2xvTa3l0Uv7qzXbqL-LPlTVwbkCYh5NH-j8Nfb99m-Pakoh31wWRWto9lS7wLZ1Pbe3Sf_Dek_vqQ</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Schneider, Thomas M</creator><creator>Osunkoya, Adeboye O</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>ERG expression in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: comparison with adjacent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma</title><author>Schneider, Thomas M ; Osunkoya, Adeboye O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>631/67/68</topic><topic>692/699/67/589/466</topic><topic>692/700/139/422</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - chemistry</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal - chemistry</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology</topic><topic>ERG</topic><topic>high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>intraductal carcinoma</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - chemistry</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>TMPRSS2-ERG</topic><topic>Trans-Activators - analysis</topic><topic>Transcriptional Regulator ERG</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osunkoya, Adeboye O</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Thomas M</au><au>Osunkoya, Adeboye O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ERG expression in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: comparison with adjacent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle><stitle>Mod Pathol</stitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1178</epage><pages>1174-1178</pages><issn>0893-3952</issn><eissn>1530-0285</eissn><coden>MODPEO</coden><abstract>Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a growth pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma that has not been well characterized from the molecular standpoint. It remains debatable whether intraductal carcinoma of the prostate represents colonization of benign glands by pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, or progression of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. TMPRSS2-ERG is the most common gene fusion in conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, identified in about 40–70% of cases. In this study, we compared the expression of ERG in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Thirty-one confirmed cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, with adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and available tissue blocks, were identified at our institution. Immunohistochemical stains were performed for ERG using a rabbit anti-ERG monoclonal antibody. The ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component was compared with that in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mean patient age was 65 years (range: 48–79 years). Positive ERG expression was identified in 11/31 (35%) cases of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. In all 11/11 (100%) cases with positive ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG expression was also positive in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. In the 20/31 cases with negative ERG expression in the intraductal carcinoma of the prostate component, ERG was also negative in the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma. It is highly conceivable that based on the identical ERG expression (positive or negative) in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and the adjacent conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate most likely represents colonization of benign glands by adjacent pre-existing conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24406865</pmid><doi>10.1038/modpathol.2013.248</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3952
ispartof Modern pathology, 2014-08, Vol.27 (8), p.1174-1178
issn 0893-3952
1530-0285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622605215
source Nature
subjects 631/67/68
692/699/67/589/466
692/700/139/422
Adenocarcinoma - chemistry
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Ductal - chemistry
Carcinoma, Ductal - pathology
ERG
high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
intraductal carcinoma
Laboratory Medicine
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
original-article
Pathology
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - chemistry
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
TMPRSS2-ERG
Trans-Activators - analysis
Transcriptional Regulator ERG
title ERG expression in intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: comparison with adjacent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A58%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ERG%20expression%20in%20intraductal%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20prostate:%20comparison%20with%20adjacent%20invasive%20prostatic%20adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Modern%20pathology&rft.au=Schneider,%20Thomas%20M&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1178&rft.pages=1174-1178&rft.issn=0893-3952&rft.eissn=1530-0285&rft.coden=MODPEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/modpathol.2013.248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1551018843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8935ae4faa1e14772339d1d6b0259210eb0351405b950bb1b7997347cf1a86a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1550119131&rft_id=info:pmid/24406865&rfr_iscdi=true