Loading…
Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma
Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers in biology and medicine 2014-10, Vol.53, p.279-290 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3 |
container_end_page | 290 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Computers in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Mirkes, E.M Alexandrakis, I Slater, K Tuli, R Gorban, A.N |
description | Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and > 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622611610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S001048251400208X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3465713641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhL6BIXLgkjD-TXECwghapUg8FiZvlncyCt0m82Eml_fc4bKtKvbSnOcwz73y8w1jBoeLAzYddhWHYb3wYqKsEcFVBUwGYZ2zFm7otQUv1nK0AOJSqEfqEvUppBwAKJLxkJ0LzVgldr9indRaaJzf5MLq-6Lz7PYbkU-HGrog-XRd04_r5f77YhligG_1IRX8Y9n_C4F6zF1vXJ3pzG0_Zz29ff6zPy4vLs-_rzxclqhamskYE1LglyRupldRS4galUqYlmafcCKO5dlwLZ4QWvBai7Ug7WTujsUV5yt4fdfcx_J0pTXbwCanv3UhhTpYbIQznhsPjqDZ5AJWvkdF3D9BdmGM-xCLIFbRGg8hUc6QwhpQibe0--sHFg-VgFz_szt77YRc_LDQ2-5FL3942mDdL7q7wzoAMfDkClI934ynahJ5GpM5Hwsl2wT-ly8cHItj70aPrr-lA6X4nm4QFe7X8xfIWeUMQ0PyS_wDQArNG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1614096502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Mirkes, E.M ; Alexandrakis, I ; Slater, K ; Tuli, R ; Gorban, A.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, E.M ; Alexandrakis, I ; Slater, K ; Tuli, R ; Gorban, A.N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and > 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25194257</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBMDAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced KNN ; Age ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; Cancer diagnosis ; Classification ; Data analysis ; Data Mining ; Decision tree ; Decision Trees ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Dogs ; Female ; Internal Medicine ; Lymphoma ; Lymphoma - diagnosis ; Lymphoma - epidemiology ; Lymphoma - veterinary ; Male ; Medical screening ; Other ; Proteins ; Radial basis functions ; Risk Assessment ; Risk evaluation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Vascular endothelial growth factor ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2014-10, Vol.53, p.279-290</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrakis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuli, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorban, A.N</creatorcontrib><title>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and > 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.</description><subject>Advanced KNN</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer diagnosis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data Mining</subject><subject>Decision tree</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Lymphoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lymphoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lymphoma - veterinary</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Radial basis functions</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk evaluation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhL6BIXLgkjD-TXECwghapUg8FiZvlncyCt0m82Eml_fc4bKtKvbSnOcwz73y8w1jBoeLAzYddhWHYb3wYqKsEcFVBUwGYZ2zFm7otQUv1nK0AOJSqEfqEvUppBwAKJLxkJ0LzVgldr9indRaaJzf5MLq-6Lz7PYbkU-HGrog-XRd04_r5f77YhligG_1IRX8Y9n_C4F6zF1vXJ3pzG0_Zz29ff6zPy4vLs-_rzxclqhamskYE1LglyRupldRS4galUqYlmafcCKO5dlwLZ4QWvBai7Ug7WTujsUV5yt4fdfcx_J0pTXbwCanv3UhhTpYbIQznhsPjqDZ5AJWvkdF3D9BdmGM-xCLIFbRGg8hUc6QwhpQibe0--sHFg-VgFz_szt77YRc_LDQ2-5FL3942mDdL7q7wzoAMfDkClI934ynahJ5GpM5Hwsl2wT-ly8cHItj70aPrr-lA6X4nm4QFe7X8xfIWeUMQ0PyS_wDQArNG</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Mirkes, E.M</creator><creator>Alexandrakis, I</creator><creator>Slater, K</creator><creator>Tuli, R</creator><creator>Gorban, A.N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</title><author>Mirkes, E.M ; Alexandrakis, I ; Slater, K ; Tuli, R ; Gorban, A.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Advanced KNN</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer diagnosis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data Mining</topic><topic>Decision tree</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Lymphoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lymphoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lymphoma - veterinary</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Radial basis functions</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk evaluation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrakis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuli, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorban, A.N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirkes, E.M</au><au>Alexandrakis, I</au><au>Slater, K</au><au>Tuli, R</au><au>Gorban, A.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>279</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>279-290</pages><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><coden>CBMDAW</coden><abstract>Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and > 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25194257</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4825 |
ispartof | Computers in biology and medicine, 2014-10, Vol.53, p.279-290 |
issn | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622611610 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Advanced KNN Age Algorithms Animals Biomarkers Cancer Cancer diagnosis Classification Data analysis Data Mining Decision tree Decision Trees Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Dogs Female Internal Medicine Lymphoma Lymphoma - diagnosis Lymphoma - epidemiology Lymphoma - veterinary Male Medical screening Other Proteins Radial basis functions Risk Assessment Risk evaluation Sensitivity and Specificity Tumors Vascular endothelial growth factor Veterinary medicine |
title | Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20diagnosis%20and%20risk%20evaluation%20for%20canine%20lymphoma&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Mirkes,%20E.M&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=279-290&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft.coden=CBMDAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3465713641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1614096502&rft_id=info:pmid/25194257&rfr_iscdi=true |