Loading…

Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma

Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in biology and medicine 2014-10, Vol.53, p.279-290
Main Authors: Mirkes, E.M, Alexandrakis, I, Slater, K, Tuli, R, Gorban, A.N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3
container_end_page 290
container_issue
container_start_page 279
container_title Computers in biology and medicine
container_volume 53
creator Mirkes, E.M
Alexandrakis, I
Slater, K
Tuli, R
Gorban, A.N
description Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and > 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622611610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S001048251400208X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3465713641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhL6BIXLgkjD-TXECwghapUg8FiZvlncyCt0m82Eml_fc4bKtKvbSnOcwz73y8w1jBoeLAzYddhWHYb3wYqKsEcFVBUwGYZ2zFm7otQUv1nK0AOJSqEfqEvUppBwAKJLxkJ0LzVgldr9indRaaJzf5MLq-6Lz7PYbkU-HGrog-XRd04_r5f77YhligG_1IRX8Y9n_C4F6zF1vXJ3pzG0_Zz29ff6zPy4vLs-_rzxclqhamskYE1LglyRupldRS4galUqYlmafcCKO5dlwLZ4QWvBai7Ug7WTujsUV5yt4fdfcx_J0pTXbwCanv3UhhTpYbIQznhsPjqDZ5AJWvkdF3D9BdmGM-xCLIFbRGg8hUc6QwhpQibe0--sHFg-VgFz_szt77YRc_LDQ2-5FL3942mDdL7q7wzoAMfDkClI934ynahJ5GpM5Hwsl2wT-ly8cHItj70aPrr-lA6X4nm4QFe7X8xfIWeUMQ0PyS_wDQArNG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1614096502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Mirkes, E.M ; Alexandrakis, I ; Slater, K ; Tuli, R ; Gorban, A.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, E.M ; Alexandrakis, I ; Slater, K ; Tuli, R ; Gorban, A.N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and &gt; 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25194257</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBMDAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced KNN ; Age ; Algorithms ; Animals ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; Cancer diagnosis ; Classification ; Data analysis ; Data Mining ; Decision tree ; Decision Trees ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Dogs ; Female ; Internal Medicine ; Lymphoma ; Lymphoma - diagnosis ; Lymphoma - epidemiology ; Lymphoma - veterinary ; Male ; Medical screening ; Other ; Proteins ; Radial basis functions ; Risk Assessment ; Risk evaluation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Vascular endothelial growth factor ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2014-10, Vol.53, p.279-290</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrakis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuli, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorban, A.N</creatorcontrib><title>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and &gt; 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.</description><subject>Advanced KNN</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer diagnosis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data Mining</subject><subject>Decision tree</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Lymphoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lymphoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lymphoma - veterinary</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Radial basis functions</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk evaluation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhL6BIXLgkjD-TXECwghapUg8FiZvlncyCt0m82Eml_fc4bKtKvbSnOcwz73y8w1jBoeLAzYddhWHYb3wYqKsEcFVBUwGYZ2zFm7otQUv1nK0AOJSqEfqEvUppBwAKJLxkJ0LzVgldr9indRaaJzf5MLq-6Lz7PYbkU-HGrog-XRd04_r5f77YhligG_1IRX8Y9n_C4F6zF1vXJ3pzG0_Zz29ff6zPy4vLs-_rzxclqhamskYE1LglyRupldRS4galUqYlmafcCKO5dlwLZ4QWvBai7Ug7WTujsUV5yt4fdfcx_J0pTXbwCanv3UhhTpYbIQznhsPjqDZ5AJWvkdF3D9BdmGM-xCLIFbRGg8hUc6QwhpQibe0--sHFg-VgFz_szt77YRc_LDQ2-5FL3942mDdL7q7wzoAMfDkClI934ynahJ5GpM5Hwsl2wT-ly8cHItj70aPrr-lA6X4nm4QFe7X8xfIWeUMQ0PyS_wDQArNG</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Mirkes, E.M</creator><creator>Alexandrakis, I</creator><creator>Slater, K</creator><creator>Tuli, R</creator><creator>Gorban, A.N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</title><author>Mirkes, E.M ; Alexandrakis, I ; Slater, K ; Tuli, R ; Gorban, A.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Advanced KNN</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer diagnosis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data Mining</topic><topic>Decision tree</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Lymphoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lymphoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lymphoma - veterinary</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Radial basis functions</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk evaluation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrakis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuli, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorban, A.N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirkes, E.M</au><au>Alexandrakis, I</au><au>Slater, K</au><au>Tuli, R</au><au>Gorban, A.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>279</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>279-290</pages><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><coden>CBMDAW</coden><abstract>Abstract The canine lymphoma blood test detects the levels of two biomarkers, the acute phase proteins (C-Reactive Protein and Haptoglobin). This test can be used for diagnostics, for screening, and for remission monitoring as well. We analyze clinical data, test various machine learning methods and select the best approach to these oblems. Three families of methods, decision trees, kNN (including advanced and adaptive kNN) and probability density evaluation with radial basis functions, are used for classification and risk estimation. Several pre-processing approaches were implemented and compared. The best of them are used to create the diagnostic system. For the differential diagnosis the best solution gives the sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 77%, respectively (using three input features, CRP, Haptoglobin and standard clinical symptom). For the screening task, the decision tree method provides the best result, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.4% and &gt; 99 % , respectively (using the same input features). If the clinical symptoms (Lymphadenopathy) are considered as unknown then a decision tree with CRP and Hapt only provides sensitivity 69% and specificity 83.5%. The lymphoma risk evaluation problem is formulated and solved. The best models are selected as the system for computational lymphoma diagnosis and evaluation of the risk of lymphoma as well. These methods are implemented into a special web-accessed software and are applied to the problem of monitoring dogs with lymphoma after treatment. It detects recurrence of lymphoma up to two months prior to the appearance of clinical signs. The risk map visualization provides a friendly tool for exploratory data analysis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25194257</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4825
ispartof Computers in biology and medicine, 2014-10, Vol.53, p.279-290
issn 0010-4825
1879-0534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1622611610
source Elsevier
subjects Advanced KNN
Age
Algorithms
Animals
Biomarkers
Cancer
Cancer diagnosis
Classification
Data analysis
Data Mining
Decision tree
Decision Trees
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods
Dogs
Female
Internal Medicine
Lymphoma
Lymphoma - diagnosis
Lymphoma - epidemiology
Lymphoma - veterinary
Male
Medical screening
Other
Proteins
Radial basis functions
Risk Assessment
Risk evaluation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumors
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Veterinary medicine
title Computational diagnosis and risk evaluation for canine lymphoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20diagnosis%20and%20risk%20evaluation%20for%20canine%20lymphoma&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Mirkes,%20E.M&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=279-290&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft.coden=CBMDAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3465713641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-7cc0c5cfe3183543533cbc34469e3010b26515a152a625217229de5a37a65c9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1614096502&rft_id=info:pmid/25194257&rfr_iscdi=true