Loading…

A model of plant virus disease epidemics in asynchronously‐planted cropping systems

A mathematical model was developed of the dynamics of a plant virus disease within a spatially‐referenced lattice of fields of a host crop. The model can be applied to crops in continuous, contiguous cultivation such as tropical irrigated rice. Disease progress in each field of the host crop was ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant pathology 1997-08, Vol.46 (4), p.490-501
Main Authors: HOLT, J., CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-81e9e07f225da49d69b63174c9a436d15fa9829fc102680ee793594baa355d663
cites
container_end_page 501
container_issue 4
container_start_page 490
container_title Plant pathology
container_volume 46
creator HOLT, J.
CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.
description A mathematical model was developed of the dynamics of a plant virus disease within a spatially‐referenced lattice of fields of a host crop. The model can be applied to crops in continuous, contiguous cultivation such as tropical irrigated rice. Disease progress in each field of the host crop was assumed to be logistic and determined by incidence within the field itself as well as incidence in neighbouring fields, depending on the gradient of disease spread. The frequency distribution of planting dates (represented by the proportion of the total number of fields planted in successive months) was assumed to follow a normal distribution and the variance of planting date was used as a measure of cropping asynchrony. Analysis of the model revealed that disease incidence within the lattice (i.e. mean incidence over all fields) depended upon the infection efficiency, the slope of the dispersal gradient, and the variance in planting date. Disease endemicity depended mainly on planting date variance and disease persisted in the lattice if this variance exceeded a certain threshold. Above the threshold for persistence, the response of mean disease incidence to planting date variance was non‐linear and the region of greatest sensitivity was closest to the threshold. Thus, disease systems that show moderate rather than high cropping asynchrony are more likely to be influenced by changes in the variance of planting date. Implications for the area‐wide management of rice tungro virus disease are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-36.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16230530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16230530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-81e9e07f225da49d69b63174c9a436d15fa9829fc102680ee793594baa355d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEiHwD0ZCdLv4seusC4oo4iUhkQJqy9iz4Ghf7CSQ7fgEvpEvwSEoNdUUc--dO4eQU85SzjJ1sUi5VHkiWa5TrvUk9YwnUqXrPTLabfbJiDEpElYocUiOEBeM8VzrYkSeprRuPVS0LWlX2WZJ30O_QuoDgkWg0AUPdXBIQ0MtDo177dumXWE1fH9-_TrAU9e3XReaF4oDLqHGY3JQ2grh5G-OydP11ePsNrl_uLmbTe8Tl4lMJQUHDWxSCpF7m2mv9LOSfJI5bTOpPM9LqwuhS8eZUAUDmGiZ6-zZWpnnXik5Jufb3K5v31aAS1MHdFDFWhA7Gq5E_F-yKNRbYWyK2ENpuj7Uth8MZ2YD0izMBpfZ4DIbkCaCNFKZdfSe_R2x6GxV9rZxAXcBosiUFDrKLreyj1DB8P98M59P40r-AMn2iKo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16230530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A model of plant virus disease epidemics in asynchronously‐planted cropping systems</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>HOLT, J. ; CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>HOLT, J. ; CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</creatorcontrib><description>A mathematical model was developed of the dynamics of a plant virus disease within a spatially‐referenced lattice of fields of a host crop. The model can be applied to crops in continuous, contiguous cultivation such as tropical irrigated rice. Disease progress in each field of the host crop was assumed to be logistic and determined by incidence within the field itself as well as incidence in neighbouring fields, depending on the gradient of disease spread. The frequency distribution of planting dates (represented by the proportion of the total number of fields planted in successive months) was assumed to follow a normal distribution and the variance of planting date was used as a measure of cropping asynchrony. Analysis of the model revealed that disease incidence within the lattice (i.e. mean incidence over all fields) depended upon the infection efficiency, the slope of the dispersal gradient, and the variance in planting date. Disease endemicity depended mainly on planting date variance and disease persisted in the lattice if this variance exceeded a certain threshold. Above the threshold for persistence, the response of mean disease incidence to planting date variance was non‐linear and the region of greatest sensitivity was closest to the threshold. Thus, disease systems that show moderate rather than high cropping asynchrony are more likely to be influenced by changes in the variance of planting date. Implications for the area‐wide management of rice tungro virus disease are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-36.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLPAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant viruses and viroids</subject><ispartof>Plant pathology, 1997-08, Vol.46 (4), p.490-501</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-81e9e07f225da49d69b63174c9a436d15fa9829fc102680ee793594baa355d663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2846329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOLT, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</creatorcontrib><title>A model of plant virus disease epidemics in asynchronously‐planted cropping systems</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>A mathematical model was developed of the dynamics of a plant virus disease within a spatially‐referenced lattice of fields of a host crop. The model can be applied to crops in continuous, contiguous cultivation such as tropical irrigated rice. Disease progress in each field of the host crop was assumed to be logistic and determined by incidence within the field itself as well as incidence in neighbouring fields, depending on the gradient of disease spread. The frequency distribution of planting dates (represented by the proportion of the total number of fields planted in successive months) was assumed to follow a normal distribution and the variance of planting date was used as a measure of cropping asynchrony. Analysis of the model revealed that disease incidence within the lattice (i.e. mean incidence over all fields) depended upon the infection efficiency, the slope of the dispersal gradient, and the variance in planting date. Disease endemicity depended mainly on planting date variance and disease persisted in the lattice if this variance exceeded a certain threshold. Above the threshold for persistence, the response of mean disease incidence to planting date variance was non‐linear and the region of greatest sensitivity was closest to the threshold. Thus, disease systems that show moderate rather than high cropping asynchrony are more likely to be influenced by changes in the variance of planting date. Implications for the area‐wide management of rice tungro virus disease are discussed.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant viruses and viroids</subject><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOAzEQRS0EEiHwD0ZCdLv4seusC4oo4iUhkQJqy9iz4Ghf7CSQ7fgEvpEvwSEoNdUUc--dO4eQU85SzjJ1sUi5VHkiWa5TrvUk9YwnUqXrPTLabfbJiDEpElYocUiOEBeM8VzrYkSeprRuPVS0LWlX2WZJ30O_QuoDgkWg0AUPdXBIQ0MtDo177dumXWE1fH9-_TrAU9e3XReaF4oDLqHGY3JQ2grh5G-OydP11ePsNrl_uLmbTe8Tl4lMJQUHDWxSCpF7m2mv9LOSfJI5bTOpPM9LqwuhS8eZUAUDmGiZ6-zZWpnnXik5Jufb3K5v31aAS1MHdFDFWhA7Gq5E_F-yKNRbYWyK2ENpuj7Uth8MZ2YD0izMBpfZ4DIbkCaCNFKZdfSe_R2x6GxV9rZxAXcBosiUFDrKLreyj1DB8P98M59P40r-AMn2iKo</recordid><startdate>199708</startdate><enddate>199708</enddate><creator>HOLT, J.</creator><creator>CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199708</creationdate><title>A model of plant virus disease epidemics in asynchronously‐planted cropping systems</title><author>HOLT, J. ; CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-81e9e07f225da49d69b63174c9a436d15fa9829fc102680ee793594baa355d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant viruses and viroids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOLT, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOLT, J.</au><au>CHANCELLOR, T.C.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A model of plant virus disease epidemics in asynchronously‐planted cropping systems</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>1997-08</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>490-501</pages><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><coden>PLPAAD</coden><abstract>A mathematical model was developed of the dynamics of a plant virus disease within a spatially‐referenced lattice of fields of a host crop. The model can be applied to crops in continuous, contiguous cultivation such as tropical irrigated rice. Disease progress in each field of the host crop was assumed to be logistic and determined by incidence within the field itself as well as incidence in neighbouring fields, depending on the gradient of disease spread. The frequency distribution of planting dates (represented by the proportion of the total number of fields planted in successive months) was assumed to follow a normal distribution and the variance of planting date was used as a measure of cropping asynchrony. Analysis of the model revealed that disease incidence within the lattice (i.e. mean incidence over all fields) depended upon the infection efficiency, the slope of the dispersal gradient, and the variance in planting date. Disease endemicity depended mainly on planting date variance and disease persisted in the lattice if this variance exceeded a certain threshold. Above the threshold for persistence, the response of mean disease incidence to planting date variance was non‐linear and the region of greatest sensitivity was closest to the threshold. Thus, disease systems that show moderate rather than high cropping asynchrony are more likely to be influenced by changes in the variance of planting date. Implications for the area‐wide management of rice tungro virus disease are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-36.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0862
ispartof Plant pathology, 1997-08, Vol.46 (4), p.490-501
issn 0032-0862
1365-3059
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16230530
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antiviral substances, control
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Plant viruses and viroids
title A model of plant virus disease epidemics in asynchronously‐planted cropping systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20model%20of%20plant%20virus%20disease%20epidemics%20in%20asynchronously%E2%80%90planted%20cropping%20systems&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=HOLT,%20J.&rft.date=1997-08&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=490-501&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft.coden=PLPAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-36.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16230530%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4246-81e9e07f225da49d69b63174c9a436d15fa9829fc102680ee793594baa355d663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16230530&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true