Flow artifact in the anterior communicating artery resembling aneurysm on the time of flight MR angiogram

Background Magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) of the brain is a widely employed non-invasive test to diagnose aneurysms. However, its overall accuracy is less than digital subtraction angiography and is prone to give false-positive or false-negative results. False-negative results can be seen with h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2014-12, Vol.55 (10), p.1253-1257
Main Authors: Takhtani, Deepak, Dundamadappa, Sathish, Puri, Ajit S, Wakhloo, Ajay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aneurysm, False - diagnosis
Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods
Cerebral Angiography - methods
Cerebral Arteries - diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Arteries - pathology
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) of the brain is a widely employed non-invasive test to diagnose aneurysms. However, its overall accuracy is less than digital subtraction angiography and is prone to give false-positive or false-negative results. False-negative results can be seen with hemorrhage, lipoma, dermoid, posterior lobe of the pituitary gland, and the flow artifacts. Purpose To describe the findings associated with false aneurysms in the anterior communicating artery on the time of flight MRA and review the physical principles behind this artifact. Material and Methods This short series comprises of four patients whose MRA showed suspicious aneurysms in the region of the anterior communicating artery (ACOM) on time of flight MRA. Results Two patients underwent catheter angiogram and the other two patients had computed tomography angiogram. None of these cases proved to have aneurysms and normal anterior communicating arteries were seen in all the patients. The findings on the MR angiograms were considered artifacts. All of the pseudoaneurysm had tapered appearance. Conclusion MR angiogram can result in artifacts at ACOM which may be mistaken for aneurysm. Such pseudoaneurysms have characteristic appearance and should be followed up with non-invasive tests.
ISSN:0284-1851
1600-0455
DOI:10.1177/0284185113520153