Loading…

The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

Purpose Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature. Methods Medline, Web of Knowledge, and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2014-12, Vol.399 (8), p.989-1000
Main Authors: Fitzgerald, Timothy L., Brinkley, Jason, Banks, Shannon, Vohra, Nasreen, Englert, Zachary P., Zervos, Emmanuel E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443
container_end_page 1000
container_issue 8
container_start_page 989
container_title Langenbeck's archives of surgery
container_volume 399
creator Fitzgerald, Timothy L.
Brinkley, Jason
Banks, Shannon
Vohra, Nasreen
Englert, Zachary P.
Zervos, Emmanuel E.
description Purpose Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature. Methods Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as “liver resection” and “primary tumor.” Inclusion criteria were year > 1990, >five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test. Results A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal ( n  = 234), ovarian ( n  = 119), testicular ( n  = 153), adrenal ( n  = 90), small bowel ( n  = 28), gallbladder ( n  = 21), duodenum ( n  = 38), gastric ( n  = 481), pancreatic ( n  = 55), esophageal ( n  = 23), head and neck ( n  = 15), and lung ( n  = 36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) ( n  = 106), cholangiocarcinoma ( n  = 13), sarcoma ( n  = 189), and melanoma ( n  = 643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries ( n  = 549; range 5.4–142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer ( n  = 1,013; range 8–74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer ( n  = 549; range 5–58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types ( n  = 1,082; range 10–72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites. Conclusions There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00423-014-1241-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1625346761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1625346761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAURC0EoqXwAWxQliwI-J2EHap4SZXYlLWVONeQKrGLnRT173FJ6RLpSr62Z0aag9AlwbcE4-wuYMwpSzHhKaGcpOwITQlnIqVckOPDztkEnYWwwhjLrOCnaEIF4Xkmsylql5-QVGDBNH1InEnaZgM-8RBA942ziXE-sc6m2rXOx7eyvfm9Wxi8A1s77RsLe1sHfRniQLhPyiRsQw9d2Tc65m0a-D5HJ6ZsA1zszxl6f3pczl_Sxdvz6_xhkWqBRZ9KmjNCTG0ybbQ2opCsqGpTAKk1LSuZVTKvuc7rStYVFbkGbXLKhCh0piHWnaHrMXft3dcAoVddEzS0bWnBDUERSQXjMpMkSsko1d6F4MGotW-60m8VwWoHWY2QVYSsdpAVi56rffxQdVAfHH9Uo4COghC_7Ad4tXKDt7HyP6k_YZmJ_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1625346761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Fitzgerald, Timothy L. ; Brinkley, Jason ; Banks, Shannon ; Vohra, Nasreen ; Englert, Zachary P. ; Zervos, Emmanuel E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Timothy L. ; Brinkley, Jason ; Banks, Shannon ; Vohra, Nasreen ; Englert, Zachary P. ; Zervos, Emmanuel E.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature. Methods Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as “liver resection” and “primary tumor.” Inclusion criteria were year &gt; 1990, &gt;five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test. Results A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal ( n  = 234), ovarian ( n  = 119), testicular ( n  = 153), adrenal ( n  = 90), small bowel ( n  = 28), gallbladder ( n  = 21), duodenum ( n  = 38), gastric ( n  = 481), pancreatic ( n  = 55), esophageal ( n  = 23), head and neck ( n  = 15), and lung ( n  = 36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) ( n  = 106), cholangiocarcinoma ( n  = 13), sarcoma ( n  = 189), and melanoma ( n  = 643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries ( n  = 549; range 5.4–142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer ( n  = 1,013; range 8–74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer ( n  = 549; range 5–58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types ( n  = 1,082; range 10–72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites. Conclusions There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-2443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1241-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25148767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Cardiac Surgery ; General Surgery ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Survival Rate ; Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses ; Thoracic Surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Vascular Surgery</subject><ispartof>Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2014-12, Vol.399 (8), p.989-1000</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25148767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Timothy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkley, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vohra, Nasreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Englert, Zachary P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zervos, Emmanuel E.</creatorcontrib><title>The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review</title><title>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</title><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature. Methods Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as “liver resection” and “primary tumor.” Inclusion criteria were year &gt; 1990, &gt;five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test. Results A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal ( n  = 234), ovarian ( n  = 119), testicular ( n  = 153), adrenal ( n  = 90), small bowel ( n  = 28), gallbladder ( n  = 21), duodenum ( n  = 38), gastric ( n  = 481), pancreatic ( n  = 55), esophageal ( n  = 23), head and neck ( n  = 15), and lung ( n  = 36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) ( n  = 106), cholangiocarcinoma ( n  = 13), sarcoma ( n  = 189), and melanoma ( n  = 643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries ( n  = 549; range 5.4–142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer ( n  = 1,013; range 8–74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer ( n  = 549; range 5–58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types ( n  = 1,082; range 10–72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites. Conclusions There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>1435-2443</issn><issn>1435-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAURC0EoqXwAWxQliwI-J2EHap4SZXYlLWVONeQKrGLnRT173FJ6RLpSr62Z0aag9AlwbcE4-wuYMwpSzHhKaGcpOwITQlnIqVckOPDztkEnYWwwhjLrOCnaEIF4Xkmsylql5-QVGDBNH1InEnaZgM-8RBA942ziXE-sc6m2rXOx7eyvfm9Wxi8A1s77RsLe1sHfRniQLhPyiRsQw9d2Tc65m0a-D5HJ6ZsA1zszxl6f3pczl_Sxdvz6_xhkWqBRZ9KmjNCTG0ybbQ2opCsqGpTAKk1LSuZVTKvuc7rStYVFbkGbXLKhCh0piHWnaHrMXft3dcAoVddEzS0bWnBDUERSQXjMpMkSsko1d6F4MGotW-60m8VwWoHWY2QVYSsdpAVi56rffxQdVAfHH9Uo4COghC_7Ad4tXKDt7HyP6k_YZmJ_A</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Fitzgerald, Timothy L.</creator><creator>Brinkley, Jason</creator><creator>Banks, Shannon</creator><creator>Vohra, Nasreen</creator><creator>Englert, Zachary P.</creator><creator>Zervos, Emmanuel E.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review</title><author>Fitzgerald, Timothy L. ; Brinkley, Jason ; Banks, Shannon ; Vohra, Nasreen ; Englert, Zachary P. ; Zervos, Emmanuel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Timothy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkley, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vohra, Nasreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Englert, Zachary P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zervos, Emmanuel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitzgerald, Timothy L.</au><au>Brinkley, Jason</au><au>Banks, Shannon</au><au>Vohra, Nasreen</au><au>Englert, Zachary P.</au><au>Zervos, Emmanuel E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</stitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>399</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>989</spage><epage>1000</epage><pages>989-1000</pages><issn>1435-2443</issn><eissn>1435-2451</eissn><abstract>Purpose Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature. Methods Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as “liver resection” and “primary tumor.” Inclusion criteria were year &gt; 1990, &gt;five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test. Results A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal ( n  = 234), ovarian ( n  = 119), testicular ( n  = 153), adrenal ( n  = 90), small bowel ( n  = 28), gallbladder ( n  = 21), duodenum ( n  = 38), gastric ( n  = 481), pancreatic ( n  = 55), esophageal ( n  = 23), head and neck ( n  = 15), and lung ( n  = 36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) ( n  = 106), cholangiocarcinoma ( n  = 13), sarcoma ( n  = 189), and melanoma ( n  = 643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries ( n  = 549; range 5.4–142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer ( n  = 1,013; range 8–74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer ( n  = 549; range 5–58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types ( n  = 1,082; range 10–72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites. Conclusions There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25148767</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00423-014-1241-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-2443
ispartof Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2014-12, Vol.399 (8), p.989-1000
issn 1435-2443
1435-2451
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1625346761
source Springer Nature
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Cardiac Surgery
General Surgery
Hepatectomy - methods
Humans
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Survival Rate
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Thoracic Surgery
Traumatic Surgery
Vascular Surgery
title The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20benefits%20of%20liver%20resection%20for%20non-colorectal,%20non-neuroendocrine%20liver%20metastases:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Langenbeck's%20archives%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Fitzgerald,%20Timothy%20L.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=399&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=989&rft.epage=1000&rft.pages=989-1000&rft.issn=1435-2443&rft.eissn=1435-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00423-014-1241-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1625346761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-628311fdf7cfccf59639bdf9e1dc2ab67b68d4c8db6db258cecf823559c7ce443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1625346761&rft_id=info:pmid/25148767&rfr_iscdi=true