Loading…

Nitrogen budget in the River Auli catchment: a catchment dominated by agriculture in southeastern Norway

An intensive study on N inputs and losses has been carried out in six sub-catchments and the main catchment of the river Auli$(366\ {\rm km}^{2})$in southeastern Norway, from 1992 to 1995. Total N transport in the main river outlet was 20.6, 19.1 and 26.5 kg N ha-1yr-1, respectively, for the agrohyd...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ambio 1997-08, Vol.26 (5), p.289-295
Main Authors: Hoeyaas, T.R, Vagstad, N, Bechmann, M, Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 295
container_issue 5
container_start_page 289
container_title Ambio
container_volume 26
creator Hoeyaas, T.R
Vagstad, N
Bechmann, M
Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))
description An intensive study on N inputs and losses has been carried out in six sub-catchments and the main catchment of the river Auli$(366\ {\rm km}^{2})$in southeastern Norway, from 1992 to 1995. Total N transport in the main river outlet was 20.6, 19.1 and 26.5 kg N ha-1yr-1, respectively, for the agrohydrological years 1992/93 to 1994/95. Approximately 85% of the total input of N to the catchment area is related to agricultural activities, of which 65-70% derives from mineral fertilizers. Only 15% derives from long-distance atmospheric deposition. Nitrogen input did not vary much from one year to another, while output varied considerably due to shifting weather conditions. Consequently, the surplus one particular year was mainly determined by the crop yields obtained. The whole catchment surplus varied from 20 to 41 kg ha-1during the monitoring period. High N surplus might increase the nitrate leaching risk, but other factors such as amount, intensity and time of precipitation, and net mineralization during winter appear to influence nitrogen losses to a great extent. The three-year average nitrogen transport from the agricultural catchment was 64 kg N ha-1yr-1. N transport from forest catchments was considerably lower and varied from 2 to 10 kg N ha-1yr-1. Agricultural losses were by far the most important contributor to N transport in the main river.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16265899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4314606</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4314606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f286t-c82f79bf04c73d7ef6d35d622c79844e477b5921c5824b13c221920d95204bde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QFxk5a6Qx51k4q6U-oBSwcd6yCSZNmVmUpOM0n9vSwWXXZ17uB_f4pyhERUFTCQj6hyNCIH9DSAv0VVKG0KI4JyP0Hrpcwwr1-N6sCuXse9xXjv85r9dxNOh9djobNad6_MD1v8F29D5Xmdncb3DehW9Gdo8RHcwpDDsJTplF3u8DPFH767RRaPb5G7-cow-H-cfs-fJ4vXpZTZdTBpWijwxJWukqhsCRnIrXSMsL6xgzEhVAjiQsi4Uo6YoGdSUG8aoYsSqghGoreNjdH_0bmP4GlzKVeeTcW2rexeGVFHBRFEqdRoEEFIJOA1ywRShB_DuCG5SDrHaRt_puKuAUxD7ucfo9vhudKgOg6Xqfa4kpark_BeAC4Il</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13629014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen budget in the River Auli catchment: a catchment dominated by agriculture in southeastern Norway</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hoeyaas, T.R ; Vagstad, N ; Bechmann, M ; Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoeyaas, T.R ; Vagstad, N ; Bechmann, M ; Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</creatorcontrib><description>An intensive study on N inputs and losses has been carried out in six sub-catchments and the main catchment of the river Auli$(366\ {\rm km}^{2})$in southeastern Norway, from 1992 to 1995. Total N transport in the main river outlet was 20.6, 19.1 and 26.5 kg N ha-1yr-1, respectively, for the agrohydrological years 1992/93 to 1994/95. Approximately 85% of the total input of N to the catchment area is related to agricultural activities, of which 65-70% derives from mineral fertilizers. Only 15% derives from long-distance atmospheric deposition. Nitrogen input did not vary much from one year to another, while output varied considerably due to shifting weather conditions. Consequently, the surplus one particular year was mainly determined by the crop yields obtained. The whole catchment surplus varied from 20 to 41 kg ha-1during the monitoring period. High N surplus might increase the nitrate leaching risk, but other factors such as amount, intensity and time of precipitation, and net mineralization during winter appear to influence nitrogen losses to a great extent. The three-year average nitrogen transport from the agricultural catchment was 64 kg N ha-1yr-1. N transport from forest catchments was considerably lower and varied from 2 to 10 kg N ha-1yr-1. Agricultural losses were by far the most important contributor to N transport in the main river.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>ABONOS NITROGENADOS ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural runoff ; Agricultural soils ; AZOTE ; BASSIN VERSANT ; COURS D'EAU ; CROP YIELD ; Crops ; CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS ; CURSOS DE AGUA ; ENGRAIS AZOTE ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ; Forest soils ; Grassland soils ; IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT ; IMPACTO AMBIENTAL ; Intensive production ; NITROGEN ; NITROGEN FERTILIZERS ; NITROGENO ; NORUEGA ; NORVEGE ; NORWAY ; Organic farming ; POLLUTION BY AGRICULTURE ; POLLUTION DE L'EAU ; POLLUTION PAR L'AGRICULTURE ; POLUCION DEL AGUA ; POLUCION POR LA AGRICULTURA ; RENDEMENT DES CULTURES ; RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS ; RIVERS ; WATER POLLUTION ; WATERSHEDS</subject><ispartof>Ambio, 1997-08, Vol.26 (5), p.289-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4314606$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4314606$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoeyaas, T.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vagstad, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechmann, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen budget in the River Auli catchment: a catchment dominated by agriculture in southeastern Norway</title><title>Ambio</title><description>An intensive study on N inputs and losses has been carried out in six sub-catchments and the main catchment of the river Auli$(366\ {\rm km}^{2})$in southeastern Norway, from 1992 to 1995. Total N transport in the main river outlet was 20.6, 19.1 and 26.5 kg N ha-1yr-1, respectively, for the agrohydrological years 1992/93 to 1994/95. Approximately 85% of the total input of N to the catchment area is related to agricultural activities, of which 65-70% derives from mineral fertilizers. Only 15% derives from long-distance atmospheric deposition. Nitrogen input did not vary much from one year to another, while output varied considerably due to shifting weather conditions. Consequently, the surplus one particular year was mainly determined by the crop yields obtained. The whole catchment surplus varied from 20 to 41 kg ha-1during the monitoring period. High N surplus might increase the nitrate leaching risk, but other factors such as amount, intensity and time of precipitation, and net mineralization during winter appear to influence nitrogen losses to a great extent. The three-year average nitrogen transport from the agricultural catchment was 64 kg N ha-1yr-1. N transport from forest catchments was considerably lower and varied from 2 to 10 kg N ha-1yr-1. Agricultural losses were by far the most important contributor to N transport in the main river.</description><subject>ABONOS NITROGENADOS</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>AZOTE</subject><subject>BASSIN VERSANT</subject><subject>COURS D'EAU</subject><subject>CROP YIELD</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS</subject><subject>CURSOS DE AGUA</subject><subject>ENGRAIS AZOTE</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Grassland soils</subject><subject>IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT</subject><subject>IMPACTO AMBIENTAL</subject><subject>Intensive production</subject><subject>NITROGEN</subject><subject>NITROGEN FERTILIZERS</subject><subject>NITROGENO</subject><subject>NORUEGA</subject><subject>NORVEGE</subject><subject>NORWAY</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>POLLUTION BY AGRICULTURE</subject><subject>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</subject><subject>POLLUTION PAR L'AGRICULTURE</subject><subject>POLUCION DEL AGUA</subject><subject>POLUCION POR LA AGRICULTURA</subject><subject>RENDEMENT DES CULTURES</subject><subject>RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS</subject><subject>RIVERS</subject><subject>WATER POLLUTION</subject><subject>WATERSHEDS</subject><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QFxk5a6Qx51k4q6U-oBSwcd6yCSZNmVmUpOM0n9vSwWXXZ17uB_f4pyhERUFTCQj6hyNCIH9DSAv0VVKG0KI4JyP0Hrpcwwr1-N6sCuXse9xXjv85r9dxNOh9djobNad6_MD1v8F29D5Xmdncb3DehW9Gdo8RHcwpDDsJTplF3u8DPFH767RRaPb5G7-cow-H-cfs-fJ4vXpZTZdTBpWijwxJWukqhsCRnIrXSMsL6xgzEhVAjiQsi4Uo6YoGdSUG8aoYsSqghGoreNjdH_0bmP4GlzKVeeTcW2rexeGVFHBRFEqdRoEEFIJOA1ywRShB_DuCG5SDrHaRt_puKuAUxD7ucfo9vhudKgOg6Xqfa4kpark_BeAC4Il</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>Hoeyaas, T.R</creator><creator>Vagstad, N</creator><creator>Bechmann, M</creator><creator>Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</creator><general>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>Nitrogen budget in the River Auli catchment: a catchment dominated by agriculture in southeastern Norway</title><author>Hoeyaas, T.R ; Vagstad, N ; Bechmann, M ; Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f286t-c82f79bf04c73d7ef6d35d622c79844e477b5921c5824b13c221920d95204bde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>ABONOS NITROGENADOS</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>AZOTE</topic><topic>BASSIN VERSANT</topic><topic>COURS D'EAU</topic><topic>CROP YIELD</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS</topic><topic>CURSOS DE AGUA</topic><topic>ENGRAIS AZOTE</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Grassland soils</topic><topic>IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT</topic><topic>IMPACTO AMBIENTAL</topic><topic>Intensive production</topic><topic>NITROGEN</topic><topic>NITROGEN FERTILIZERS</topic><topic>NITROGENO</topic><topic>NORUEGA</topic><topic>NORVEGE</topic><topic>NORWAY</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>POLLUTION BY AGRICULTURE</topic><topic>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</topic><topic>POLLUTION PAR L'AGRICULTURE</topic><topic>POLUCION DEL AGUA</topic><topic>POLUCION POR LA AGRICULTURA</topic><topic>RENDEMENT DES CULTURES</topic><topic>RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS</topic><topic>RIVERS</topic><topic>WATER POLLUTION</topic><topic>WATERSHEDS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoeyaas, T.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vagstad, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechmann, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoeyaas, T.R</au><au>Vagstad, N</au><au>Bechmann, M</au><au>Eggestad, H.O. (Jordforsk, Aas (Norway))</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen budget in the River Auli catchment: a catchment dominated by agriculture in southeastern Norway</atitle><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>289-295</pages><issn>0044-7447</issn><eissn>1654-7209</eissn><abstract>An intensive study on N inputs and losses has been carried out in six sub-catchments and the main catchment of the river Auli$(366\ {\rm km}^{2})$in southeastern Norway, from 1992 to 1995. Total N transport in the main river outlet was 20.6, 19.1 and 26.5 kg N ha-1yr-1, respectively, for the agrohydrological years 1992/93 to 1994/95. Approximately 85% of the total input of N to the catchment area is related to agricultural activities, of which 65-70% derives from mineral fertilizers. Only 15% derives from long-distance atmospheric deposition. Nitrogen input did not vary much from one year to another, while output varied considerably due to shifting weather conditions. Consequently, the surplus one particular year was mainly determined by the crop yields obtained. The whole catchment surplus varied from 20 to 41 kg ha-1during the monitoring period. High N surplus might increase the nitrate leaching risk, but other factors such as amount, intensity and time of precipitation, and net mineralization during winter appear to influence nitrogen losses to a great extent. The three-year average nitrogen transport from the agricultural catchment was 64 kg N ha-1yr-1. N transport from forest catchments was considerably lower and varied from 2 to 10 kg N ha-1yr-1. Agricultural losses were by far the most important contributor to N transport in the main river.</abstract><pub>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-7447
ispartof Ambio, 1997-08, Vol.26 (5), p.289-295
issn 0044-7447
1654-7209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16265899
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects ABONOS NITROGENADOS
Agricultural land
Agricultural runoff
Agricultural soils
AZOTE
BASSIN VERSANT
COURS D'EAU
CROP YIELD
Crops
CUENCAS HIDROGRAFICAS
CURSOS DE AGUA
ENGRAIS AZOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Forest soils
Grassland soils
IMPACT SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT
IMPACTO AMBIENTAL
Intensive production
NITROGEN
NITROGEN FERTILIZERS
NITROGENO
NORUEGA
NORVEGE
NORWAY
Organic farming
POLLUTION BY AGRICULTURE
POLLUTION DE L'EAU
POLLUTION PAR L'AGRICULTURE
POLUCION DEL AGUA
POLUCION POR LA AGRICULTURA
RENDEMENT DES CULTURES
RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS
RIVERS
WATER POLLUTION
WATERSHEDS
title Nitrogen budget in the River Auli catchment: a catchment dominated by agriculture in southeastern Norway
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20budget%20in%20the%20River%20Auli%20catchment:%20a%20catchment%20dominated%20by%20agriculture%20in%20southeastern%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Ambio&rft.au=Hoeyaas,%20T.R&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=289-295&rft.issn=0044-7447&rft.eissn=1654-7209&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4314606%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f286t-c82f79bf04c73d7ef6d35d622c79844e477b5921c5824b13c221920d95204bde3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13629014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4314606&rfr_iscdi=true