Application of Process Improvement Principles to Increase the Frequency of Complete Airway Management Documentation

• Published in: Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2014-12, Vol.121 (6), p.1166-1174
• Main Authors: McCarty, L Kelsey, Saddawi-Konefka, Daniel, Gargan, Lauren M, Driscoll, William D, Walsh, John L, Peterfreund, Robert A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Airway Management - methods; Anesthesia; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Biological and medical sciences; Documentation - methods; Documentation - standards; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Information Management; Medical sciences; Quality Improvement
• ISSN: 0003-3022; 1528-1175
• DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000480

BACKGROUND:Process improvement in healthcare delivery settings can be difficult, even when there is consensus among clinicians about a clinical practice or desired outcome. Airway management is a medical intervention fundamental to the delivery of anesthesia care. Like other medical interventions, a detailed description of the management methods should be documented. Despite this expectation, airway documentation is often insufficient. The authors hypothesized that formal adoption of process improvement methods could be used to increase the rate of “complete” airway management documentation. METHODS:The authors defined a set of criteria as a local practice standard of “complete” airway management documentation. The authors then employed selected process improvement methodologies over 13 months in three iterative and escalating phases to increase the percentage of records with complete documentation. The criteria were applied retrospectively to determine the baseline frequency of complete records, and prospectively to measure the impact of process improvements efforts over the three phases of implementation. RESULTS:Immediately before the initial intervention, a retrospective review of 23,011 general anesthesia cases over 6 months showed that 13.2% of patient records included complete documentation. At the conclusion of the 13-month improvement effort, documentation improved to a completion rate of 91.6% (P < 0.0001). During the subsequent 21 months, the completion rate was sustained at an average of 90.7% (SD, 0.9%) across 82,571 general anesthetic records. CONCLUSION:Systematic application of process improvement methodologies can improve airway documentation and may be similarly effective in improving other areas of anesthesia clinical practice.