Loading…
A Mixed Bag: Assessment of Market Performance and Firm Trading Behavior in the NO sub(x) RECLAIM Programme
Over the course of the past decade, tradable permit markets have grown widely popular as a policy tool for addressing environmental concerns. A performance review of the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM), which became effective in southern California in January of 1994, is presented. Re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental planning and management 1997-11, Vol.40 (6), p.751-751 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 751 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 751 |
container_title | Journal of environmental planning and management |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Klier, Thomas H Mattoon, Richard H Prager, Michael A |
description | Over the course of the past decade, tradable permit markets have grown widely popular as a policy tool for addressing environmental concerns. A performance review of the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM), which became effective in southern California in January of 1994, is presented. Researchers evaluated both the overall market performance of RECLAIM and a wide range of industry and firm specific information. Good evidence was found to support the contention that uncertainty influences market participation during the first two years of operation. Evidence is also uncovered of flexibility-induced abatement cost savings and possible business cycle effect on trading activities. The importance of institutional characteristics of trading programs is underscored. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16279191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16279191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p621-7f5b945710d9e736f2027aa80cd33d22308e42ec836403fff0f1e55c506420b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzMtOwkAUgOEuNBHRdzgro4smZ65t3ZUGhASEmO7JtD1Tir3gTGt4fBe6d_Vvvvw3wQwTLUNUOr4L7r0_I6ISTM-Ccwq75koVLEz9Cqn35H1H_QiDhZ1xnzTCgZwdXGf6ksD0Fawa10HuTNX0NSzoZL6bwUHTw3gieN-Dn4rn6wt8LLNtutnBwQ21M11HD8GtNa2nx7_Og3y1zLN1uN2_bbJ0G140Z2FkVZFIFTGsEoqEthx5ZEyMZSVExbnAmCSnMhZaorDWomWkVKlQS46FEvPg6Xd7ccPXRH48do0vqW1NT8Pkj0zzKGEJ-x9KqSMVJ-IHLwVetA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14467589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Mixed Bag: Assessment of Market Performance and Firm Trading Behavior in the NO sub(x) RECLAIM Programme</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Klier, Thomas H ; Mattoon, Richard H ; Prager, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Klier, Thomas H ; Mattoon, Richard H ; Prager, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>Over the course of the past decade, tradable permit markets have grown widely popular as a policy tool for addressing environmental concerns. A performance review of the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM), which became effective in southern California in January of 1994, is presented. Researchers evaluated both the overall market performance of RECLAIM and a wide range of industry and firm specific information. Good evidence was found to support the contention that uncertainty influences market participation during the first two years of operation. Evidence is also uncovered of flexibility-induced abatement cost savings and possible business cycle effect on trading activities. The importance of institutional characteristics of trading programs is underscored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-0568</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of environmental planning and management, 1997-11, Vol.40 (6), p.751-751</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,33589,33963,36038</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klier, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattoon, Richard H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>A Mixed Bag: Assessment of Market Performance and Firm Trading Behavior in the NO sub(x) RECLAIM Programme</title><title>Journal of environmental planning and management</title><description>Over the course of the past decade, tradable permit markets have grown widely popular as a policy tool for addressing environmental concerns. A performance review of the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM), which became effective in southern California in January of 1994, is presented. Researchers evaluated both the overall market performance of RECLAIM and a wide range of industry and firm specific information. Good evidence was found to support the contention that uncertainty influences market participation during the first two years of operation. Evidence is also uncovered of flexibility-induced abatement cost savings and possible business cycle effect on trading activities. The importance of institutional characteristics of trading programs is underscored.</description><issn>0964-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFzMtOwkAUgOEuNBHRdzgro4smZ65t3ZUGhASEmO7JtD1Tir3gTGt4fBe6d_Vvvvw3wQwTLUNUOr4L7r0_I6ISTM-Ccwq75koVLEz9Cqn35H1H_QiDhZ1xnzTCgZwdXGf6ksD0Fawa10HuTNX0NSzoZL6bwUHTw3gieN-Dn4rn6wt8LLNtutnBwQ21M11HD8GtNa2nx7_Og3y1zLN1uN2_bbJ0G140Z2FkVZFIFTGsEoqEthx5ZEyMZSVExbnAmCSnMhZaorDWomWkVKlQS46FEvPg6Xd7ccPXRH48do0vqW1NT8Pkj0zzKGEJ-x9KqSMVJ-IHLwVetA</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>Klier, Thomas H</creator><creator>Mattoon, Richard H</creator><creator>Prager, Michael A</creator><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>A Mixed Bag: Assessment of Market Performance and Firm Trading Behavior in the NO sub(x) RECLAIM Programme</title><author>Klier, Thomas H ; Mattoon, Richard H ; Prager, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p621-7f5b945710d9e736f2027aa80cd33d22308e42ec836403fff0f1e55c506420b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klier, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattoon, Richard H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental planning and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klier, Thomas H</au><au>Mattoon, Richard H</au><au>Prager, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Mixed Bag: Assessment of Market Performance and Firm Trading Behavior in the NO sub(x) RECLAIM Programme</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental planning and management</jtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>751-751</pages><issn>0964-0568</issn><abstract>Over the course of the past decade, tradable permit markets have grown widely popular as a policy tool for addressing environmental concerns. A performance review of the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM), which became effective in southern California in January of 1994, is presented. Researchers evaluated both the overall market performance of RECLAIM and a wide range of industry and firm specific information. Good evidence was found to support the contention that uncertainty influences market participation during the first two years of operation. Evidence is also uncovered of flexibility-induced abatement cost savings and possible business cycle effect on trading activities. The importance of institutional characteristics of trading programs is underscored.</abstract><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-0568 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental planning and management, 1997-11, Vol.40 (6), p.751-751 |
issn | 0964-0568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16279191 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; EconLit with Full Text; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
title | A Mixed Bag: Assessment of Market Performance and Firm Trading Behavior in the NO sub(x) RECLAIM Programme |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A53%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Mixed%20Bag:%20Assessment%20of%20Market%20Performance%20and%20Firm%20Trading%20Behavior%20in%20the%20NO%20sub(x)%20RECLAIM%20Programme&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20planning%20and%20management&rft.au=Klier,%20Thomas%20H&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=751-751&rft.issn=0964-0568&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E16279191%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p621-7f5b945710d9e736f2027aa80cd33d22308e42ec836403fff0f1e55c506420b53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14467589&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |