Predictors of food-related aggression in wild Assamese macaques and the role of conflict avoidance

• Published in: Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2014-11, Vol.68 (11), p.1829-1841
• Main Authors: Heesen, Marlies, Rogahn, Sebastian, Macdonald, Sally, Ostner, Julia, Schülke, Oliver
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: aggression; Animal Ecology; Animal populations; Behavioral Sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cheek; Ecological competition; Ecological models; Ecology; energy intake; Feeding; feeding level; Female animals; Females; Food; Food resources; Food security; Foraging behavior; group size; Health risks; Human aggression; Life Sciences; Macaca; Macaca assamensis; mammals; Monkeys; Monkeys & apes; Natural resources; Nutritive value; Original Paper; pouches; prediction; Primates; risk; Risk reduction; Social behavior; Social conditions; social impact; social structure; Zoology
• ISSN: 0340-5443; 1432-0762
• DOI: 10.1007/s00265-014-1792-x

The quality, availability and distribution of food resources and their influence on types and levels of feeding competition play a central role in ecological models of female social structure in mammals. Here, we investigate the impact of social and ecological factors on rates of food-related aggression and the use of potential conflict avoidance mechanisms in wild Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis) in northeastern Thailand. These questions were addressed by examining feeding competition at the level of individual food patches which provides detailed information on resource characteristics, aggression and feeding party composition. Results suggest that the frequency of aggression in food patches increases with increasing feeding group size and decreasing patch size but is not affected by ecological variables representing resource value (abundance and nutritional value of food items in a patch). Interestingly, females appear to employ several mechanisms to avoid direct conflicts, including the use of alternative feeding sites within food patches, delayed arrival at feeding sites, storing food in cheek pouches and co-feeding with individuals they share strong social bonds with. Conflict avoidance may be partially responsible for the absence of a rank-related skew in female energy intake in this population and may explain other cases where empirical data do not fit the predictions of socio-ecological theory. Our findings also inform the debate about the mechanisms generating fitness benefits from strong social bonds by suggesting that by increasing feeding tolerance, social bonds may enhance resource acquisition, reduce the risk of injuries and lower levels of agonism-related stress.