Loading…

Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses

Three beef dressing lines of different capacity (160, 440 and 800 head d−1) were investigated with respect to contamination associated with carcass/hide and carcass/faeces contacts, the distribution of microbial contamination on carcasses and the antimicrobial efficacy of cold water carcass washes....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied microbiology 1997-03, Vol.82 (3), p.292-300
Main Author: BELL, R.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-346f50e8fe490d95111813416730cad60db4104347e956ebf8d8976db16413f83
cites
container_end_page 300
container_issue 3
container_start_page 292
container_title Journal of applied microbiology
container_volume 82
creator BELL, R.G.
description Three beef dressing lines of different capacity (160, 440 and 800 head d−1) were investigated with respect to contamination associated with carcass/hide and carcass/faeces contacts, the distribution of microbial contamination on carcasses and the antimicrobial efficacy of cold water carcass washes. Swab samples were taken from up to 17 sites for determination of Aerobic Plate Counts at 37°C (APC 37°C) and Escherichia coli enumeration using the Petrifilm™ procedure. The three beef dressing systems produced virtually identical patterns of microbial contamination. High contamination was found at those sites associated with opening cuts and/or subject to hide contact during hide removal. Where contamination is intermittent, the use of mean microbial data tended to obscure evidence of faecal or hide contact. Consequently, worst‐case results, as represented by the 95th percentile value, were used to identify probable instances and sources of contact contamination. Sites not subject to faecal contamination or hide contact typically had swab sample APC (37°C) values of less than log 2·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by the occasional detection of E. coli at levels below log 1·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contacted by ‘clean’ hide typically had APC (37°C) counts of log 3·00 cfu cm−2 or greater accompanied by occasional E. coli counts not exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contaminated by direct faecal contact or contact with faecally contaminated hides typically had APC (37°C) counts equal to, or greater than, log 4·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by E. coli counts exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Cold water carcass washing was ineffective in removing microbial contamination and tended to bring about a posterior to anterior redistribution, resulting in increased counts at forequarter sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00356.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16283017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16283017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-346f50e8fe490d95111813416730cad60db4104347e956ebf8d8976db16413f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLAzEQgIMoVqt_QfYg3nZNNm_wUmp9UfGi55DNJpCyj5p0sf337rZLvQoDMzDfzDAfAAmCGYKE3a8yhBlNc8bzDEnJMwgxZdn2BFwcG6f7mqQU8nwCLmNcQYgwpOwcTFBOKBUyvwCLRx83wRfdxrdNopsyiW0XjI1J65Lam9AWXleJaZuNrn2j91gfhbUuMToYHaONV-DM6Sra6zFPwdfT4nP-ki4_nl_ns2VqCCcsxYQ5Cq1wlkhYSooQEggTxDiGRpcMlgXp_8OEW0mZLZwoheSsLBAjCDuBp-DusHcd2u_Oxo2qfTS2qnRj2y4qxHKBIeI9KA5g_0CMwTq1Dr7WYacQVINCtVKDKTWYUoNCtVeotv3ozXijK2pb_g2OznrgdgR0NLpyQTfGxyOX81xAKnvs4YD9-Mru_n1fvc3e-wL_Aoq2iwE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16283017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BELL, R.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>BELL, R.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Three beef dressing lines of different capacity (160, 440 and 800 head d−1) were investigated with respect to contamination associated with carcass/hide and carcass/faeces contacts, the distribution of microbial contamination on carcasses and the antimicrobial efficacy of cold water carcass washes. Swab samples were taken from up to 17 sites for determination of Aerobic Plate Counts at 37°C (APC 37°C) and Escherichia coli enumeration using the Petrifilm™ procedure. The three beef dressing systems produced virtually identical patterns of microbial contamination. High contamination was found at those sites associated with opening cuts and/or subject to hide contact during hide removal. Where contamination is intermittent, the use of mean microbial data tended to obscure evidence of faecal or hide contact. Consequently, worst‐case results, as represented by the 95th percentile value, were used to identify probable instances and sources of contact contamination. Sites not subject to faecal contamination or hide contact typically had swab sample APC (37°C) values of less than log 2·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by the occasional detection of E. coli at levels below log 1·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contacted by ‘clean’ hide typically had APC (37°C) counts of log 3·00 cfu cm−2 or greater accompanied by occasional E. coli counts not exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contaminated by direct faecal contact or contact with faecally contaminated hides typically had APC (37°C) counts equal to, or greater than, log 4·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by E. coli counts exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Cold water carcass washing was ineffective in removing microbial contamination and tended to bring about a posterior to anterior redistribution, resulting in increased counts at forequarter sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00356.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12455892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Disinfection ; Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development ; Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Feces - microbiology ; Food Contamination ; Food Handling - methods ; Food Handling - standards ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hand - microbiology ; Hand Disinfection ; Hygiene ; Meat - microbiology ; Meat - standards ; Meat and meat product industries ; Meat Products - microbiology ; Meat-Packing Industry - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied microbiology, 1997-03, Vol.82 (3), p.292-300</ispartof><rights>Society for Applied Bacteriology 1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-346f50e8fe490d95111813416730cad60db4104347e956ebf8d8976db16413f83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2728059$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12455892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BELL, R.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses</title><title>Journal of applied microbiology</title><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>Three beef dressing lines of different capacity (160, 440 and 800 head d−1) were investigated with respect to contamination associated with carcass/hide and carcass/faeces contacts, the distribution of microbial contamination on carcasses and the antimicrobial efficacy of cold water carcass washes. Swab samples were taken from up to 17 sites for determination of Aerobic Plate Counts at 37°C (APC 37°C) and Escherichia coli enumeration using the Petrifilm™ procedure. The three beef dressing systems produced virtually identical patterns of microbial contamination. High contamination was found at those sites associated with opening cuts and/or subject to hide contact during hide removal. Where contamination is intermittent, the use of mean microbial data tended to obscure evidence of faecal or hide contact. Consequently, worst‐case results, as represented by the 95th percentile value, were used to identify probable instances and sources of contact contamination. Sites not subject to faecal contamination or hide contact typically had swab sample APC (37°C) values of less than log 2·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by the occasional detection of E. coli at levels below log 1·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contacted by ‘clean’ hide typically had APC (37°C) counts of log 3·00 cfu cm−2 or greater accompanied by occasional E. coli counts not exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contaminated by direct faecal contact or contact with faecally contaminated hides typically had APC (37°C) counts equal to, or greater than, log 4·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by E. coli counts exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Cold water carcass washing was ineffective in removing microbial contamination and tended to bring about a posterior to anterior redistribution, resulting in increased counts at forequarter sites.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Food Contamination</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food Handling - standards</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hand - microbiology</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>Meat Products - microbiology</subject><subject>Meat-Packing Industry - standards</subject><issn>1364-5072</issn><issn>1365-2672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLAzEQgIMoVqt_QfYg3nZNNm_wUmp9UfGi55DNJpCyj5p0sf337rZLvQoDMzDfzDAfAAmCGYKE3a8yhBlNc8bzDEnJMwgxZdn2BFwcG6f7mqQU8nwCLmNcQYgwpOwcTFBOKBUyvwCLRx83wRfdxrdNopsyiW0XjI1J65Lam9AWXleJaZuNrn2j91gfhbUuMToYHaONV-DM6Sra6zFPwdfT4nP-ki4_nl_ns2VqCCcsxYQ5Cq1wlkhYSooQEggTxDiGRpcMlgXp_8OEW0mZLZwoheSsLBAjCDuBp-DusHcd2u_Oxo2qfTS2qnRj2y4qxHKBIeI9KA5g_0CMwTq1Dr7WYacQVINCtVKDKTWYUoNCtVeotv3ozXijK2pb_g2OznrgdgR0NLpyQTfGxyOX81xAKnvs4YD9-Mru_n1fvc3e-wL_Aoq2iwE</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>BELL, R.G.</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses</title><author>BELL, R.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-346f50e8fe490d95111813416730cad60db4104347e956ebf8d8976db16413f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Food Contamination</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food Handling - standards</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hand - microbiology</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>Meat Products - microbiology</topic><topic>Meat-Packing Industry - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BELL, R.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BELL, R.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>292</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>292-300</pages><issn>1364-5072</issn><eissn>1365-2672</eissn><abstract>Three beef dressing lines of different capacity (160, 440 and 800 head d−1) were investigated with respect to contamination associated with carcass/hide and carcass/faeces contacts, the distribution of microbial contamination on carcasses and the antimicrobial efficacy of cold water carcass washes. Swab samples were taken from up to 17 sites for determination of Aerobic Plate Counts at 37°C (APC 37°C) and Escherichia coli enumeration using the Petrifilm™ procedure. The three beef dressing systems produced virtually identical patterns of microbial contamination. High contamination was found at those sites associated with opening cuts and/or subject to hide contact during hide removal. Where contamination is intermittent, the use of mean microbial data tended to obscure evidence of faecal or hide contact. Consequently, worst‐case results, as represented by the 95th percentile value, were used to identify probable instances and sources of contact contamination. Sites not subject to faecal contamination or hide contact typically had swab sample APC (37°C) values of less than log 2·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by the occasional detection of E. coli at levels below log 1·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contacted by ‘clean’ hide typically had APC (37°C) counts of log 3·00 cfu cm−2 or greater accompanied by occasional E. coli counts not exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Sites contaminated by direct faecal contact or contact with faecally contaminated hides typically had APC (37°C) counts equal to, or greater than, log 4·00 cfu cm−2 accompanied by E. coli counts exceeding log 2·00 cfu cm−2. Cold water carcass washing was ineffective in removing microbial contamination and tended to bring about a posterior to anterior redistribution, resulting in increased counts at forequarter sites.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><pmid>12455892</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00356.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-5072
ispartof Journal of applied microbiology, 1997-03, Vol.82 (3), p.292-300
issn 1364-5072
1365-2672
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16283017
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abattoirs
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
Colony Count, Microbial
Disinfection
Escherichia coli - growth & development
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Feces - microbiology
Food Contamination
Food Handling - methods
Food Handling - standards
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hand - microbiology
Hand Disinfection
Hygiene
Meat - microbiology
Meat - standards
Meat and meat product industries
Meat Products - microbiology
Meat-Packing Industry - standards
title Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A43%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20and%20sources%20of%20microbial%20contamination%20on%20beef%20carcasses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=BELL,%20R.G.&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=292-300&rft.issn=1364-5072&rft.eissn=1365-2672&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00356.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16283017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-346f50e8fe490d95111813416730cad60db4104347e956ebf8d8976db16413f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16283017&rft_id=info:pmid/12455892&rfr_iscdi=true