Vegetative propagation and sexual reproduction in the woodland understorey pseudo-annual Circaea lutetiana L

• Published in: Plant ecology 1998, Vol.134 (2), p.211-224
• Main Authors: Verburg, R.W, During, H.J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquatic plants; asexual reproduction; Biomass; Biomass production; Crop harvesting; Crop production; Forest floor; Fruits; Growing season; Growing seasons; growth; hibernacles; Inflorescences; life cycle (organisms); Life history; Light; Light intensity; light penetration; Luminous intensity; Onagraceae; phenology; Plant ecology; Plant propagation; Plants; Rhizomes; Sexual reproduction; Trees; understory; Woodlands
• ISSN: 1385-0237; 1573-5052
• DOI: 10.1023/a:1009741102627

On the forest floor of deciduous woodlands, relative light intensity gradually declines during the early growing season. The woodland understorey pseudo-annual Circaea lutetiana L. completes its life-cycle at the end of summer. These pseudo-annuals are clonal plants which survive the winter only as seeds and as hibernacles produced by the rhizome apices. In this paper, we asked several questions related to the life-history of C. lutetiana. It was found that shoot formation in early spring did not exhaust the old hibernacle. A trade-off between rhizome + hibernacle number and weight might be expected when plants grow under resource limitation. It was hypothesised that both number and weight of rhizomes and hibernacles will be affected by light availability. Since the effect of resource supply on the size number trade-off will depend on the developmental pattern of the rhizome system, rhizome development was studied as well. Soon after the shoots emerged, 1st order rhizomes were formed in May on the nodes of the old hibernacle. First-order rhizomes branched in June and 2nd order rhizomes (side-branches) were continuously produced throughout the growing season. The phenology and developmental rate of plants growing in different light treatments were plastic. On average 30% of rhizome biomass was formed during the vegetative phase, and rhizome and fruit production were only partly separated in time. The ratio of total rhizome biomass to total fruit biomass was not affected by light. Also flower bud removal did not lead to an increase in rhizome production, which suggests that division of biomass to both reproductive modes is rather rigid. The number of 1st order rhizomes was not affected by the light treatments. Under light limitation, both rhizome number and weight of single rhizomes were reduced. In contrast, fruit number, but not weight of single fruits, was limited.