Loading…
Developmental toxicity of carbendazim: comparison of no-observed-adverse-effect level and benchmark dose approach
The benchmark dose (BD) approach has been applied to foetal data from four gavage segment II studies (rat studies 1 and 2, rabbit study, hamster study) on the teratogenic benzimidazole carbendazim. Nineteen parameters were assessed using the log-normal model as a practical tool to derive BDs; good m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food and chemical toxicology 1998, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The benchmark dose (BD) approach has been applied to foetal data from four gavage segment II studies (rat studies 1 and 2, rabbit study, hamster study) on the teratogenic benzimidazole carbendazim. Nineteen parameters were assessed using the log-normal model as a practical tool to derive BDs; good model fitting was observed for all except two parameters. Data were evaluated on a ‘per-implant/foetus’ basis; BDs were derived from response rate increases of 1, 5 and 10%. The values were compared to the lowest-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs) and no-observed-adverse effect levels (NOAELs) obtained by Fisher's exact test on a ‘per-implant/foetus’ basis. Frank effects observed only at the top dose and/or small sample size tended to increase the 95% confidence limits and this influenced the determination of BD. Generally, the BD approach provided slightly more conservative estimates than NOAEL; overall, BD01 and BD05 were similar to NOAEL, or even lower for several parameters. The LOAEL in most cases was similar to BD10. Reference doses obtained by dividing BD01 by a 10 or 100 uncertainty factor, corresponded to residual risks of 10
−5 or below. For two critical parameters (hydrocephalus in rat study 1 and resorption rate in the rabbit study) a NOAEL could not be found, whereas a BD was always determined. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-6915 1873-6351 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00116-6 |