Combining Simulated Patients and Simulators: Pilot Study of Hybrid Simulation in Teaching Cardiac Auscultation

• Published in: Advances in physiology education 2014-12, Vol.38 (4), p.343-347
• Main Authors: Friederichs, Hendrik, Weissenstein, Anne, Ligges, Sandra, Möller, David, Becker, Jan C, Marschall, Bernhard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical Competence - standards; Comparative Analysis; Control Groups; Experimental Groups; Feedback (Response); Female; Foreign Countries; Germany; Heart Auscultation - methods; Humans; Learning; Likert Scales; Male; Manikins; Medical Education; Medical Students; Patients; Physiology; Pilot Projects; Problem-Based Learning - methods; Problem-Based Learning - standards; Questionnaires; Self evaluation; Simulation; Statistical Analysis; Student Attitudes; Students, Medical; Teaching - methods; Teaching Experience; Tutors; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1043-4046; 1522-1229
• DOI: 10.1152/advan.00039.2013

Auscultation torsos are widely used to teach position-dependent heart sounds and murmurs. To provide a more realistic teaching experience, both whole body auscultation mannequins and torsos have been used in clinical examination skills training at the Medical Faculty of the University of Muenster since the winter term of 2008-2009. This training has since been extended by simulated patients, which are normal, healthy subjects who have undergone attachment of the electronic components of the auscultation mannequins to their chests to mimic pathophysiological conditions ("hybrid models"). The acceptance of this new learning method was examined in the present pilot study. In total, 143 students in their second preclinical year who were participating in auscultation training were randomized into an intervention group (hybrid models) and a control group (auscultation mannequins). One hundred forty-two (99.3%) of these students completed a self-assessment Likert-scale questionnaire regarding different teaching approaches (where 1 = "very poor" to 100 = "very good"). The questionnaire focused on the "value of learning" of different teaching approaches. Direct comparison showed that students evaluated the hybrid models to be significantly more effective than the auscultation mannequins (median: 83 vs. 64, P < 0.001). The cardiac auscultation training was generally assessed positively (median: 88). Additionally, verbal feedback was obtained from simulated patients and tutors (trained students who had successfully passed the course a few semesters earlier). Personal feedback showed high satisfaction from student tutors and simulated patients. Hybrid simulators for teaching cardiac auscultation elucidated positive responses from students, tutors, and simulated patients.