Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three different implants

• Published in: Injury 2014-12, Vol.45 (12), p.2040-2044
• Main Authors: Scolaro, John A, Hsu, Jason E, Svach, David J, Mehta, Samir
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biomechanical; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Plates; Distal humerus; Extra-articular; Fracture Fixation, Internal - education; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation; Humans; Humeral Fractures - physiopathology; Humeral Fractures - surgery; Materials Testing; Orthopedics; Osteotomy - education; Osteotomy - instrumentation; Posterolateral plate; Prosthesis Design; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0020-1383; 1879-0267
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.036

Abstract Operative fixation of extra-articular distal humerus using a single posterolateral column plate has been described but the biomechanical properties or limits of this technique is undefined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of distal humerus fracture fixation using three standard fixation constructs. Two equal groups were created from forty sawbones humeri. Osteotomies were created at 80 mm or 50 mm from the tip of the trochlea. In the proximal osteotomy group, sawbones were fixed with an 8-hole 3.5 mm LCP or with a 6-hole posterolateral plate. In the distal group, sawbones were fixed with 9-hole medial and lateral 3.5 mm distal humerus plates and ten sawbones were fixed with a 6-hole posterolateral plate. Biomechanical testing was performed using a servohydraulic testing machine. Testing in extension as well as internal and external rotation was performed. Destructive testing was also performed with failure being defined as hardware pullout, sawbone failure or cortical contact at the osteotomy. In the proximal osteotomy group, the average bending stiffness and torsional stiffness was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate than with the 3.5 mm LCP. In the distal osteotomy group, the average bending stiffness and torsional stiffness was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate than the 3.5 mm LCP. In extension testing, the yield strength was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate in the proximal osteotomy specimens, and the dual plating construct in the distal osteotomy specimens. The yield strength of specimens in axial torsion was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate in the proximal osteotomy specimens, and the dual plating construct in the distal osteotomy specimens. Limited biomechanical data to support the use of a pre-contoured posterolateral distal humerus LCP for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus exists. We have found that this implant provided significantly greater bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and yield strength than a single 3.5 mm LCP plate for osteotomies created 80 mm from the trochlea. At the more distal osteotomy, dual plating was biomechanically superior. Our results suggest that single posterolateral column fixation of extra-articular humerus fractures is appropriate for more proximal fractures but that dual plate fixation is superior for more distal fractures.