Loading…

Dysocclusion after maxillofacial trauma: A 42 year analysis

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of posttraumatic dysocclusion in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Patients and methods All patients who underwent surgical correction of a posttraumatic dysocclusi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1083-1086
Main Authors: Kommers, Sofie C, van den Bergh, Bart, Boffano, Paolo, Verweij, Koen P, Forouzanfar, Tymour
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3
container_end_page 1086
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1083
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 42
creator Kommers, Sofie C
van den Bergh, Bart
Boffano, Paolo
Verweij, Koen P
Forouzanfar, Tymour
description Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of posttraumatic dysocclusion in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Patients and methods All patients who underwent surgical correction of a posttraumatic dysocclusion between 1970 and 2012 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 42 patients were included. Twenty-seven patients had a mandibular condyle fracture (64.3%). The initial fracture-treatment was either conservative, consisting only of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Though different orthognathic treatment options were used to regain normal occlusion, the most frequently used surgical techniques were a uni- or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible in 21 patients (50.0%), followed by a Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla in 17 patients (40.5%). Conclusions Most dysocclusions occur after mandibular condyle fractures, however fractures of other maxillofacial structures also account for a considerable number of cases. Good results are achieved with orthognathic surgery for posttraumatic dysocclusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629966213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518213001418</els_id><sourcerecordid>1629966213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1jAQhK2KipbCC_SAcuSSsGs7dgKoUtUCRarEAThbG8eRnDpJsRNE3r5J_8KBA6ddrWZG2m8YO0coEFC97YveDqnggKKAstjGETvFSle5RKyfbTsg5CVW_IS9SKkHAAVV_ZydcFHJmkt1yt5fr2myNizJT2NG3exiNtBvH8LUkfUUsjnSMtC77DKTPFsdxYxGCmvy6SU77igk9-ppnrEfnz5-v7rJb79-_nJ1eZvbEmHOa10KhLbRLVoi6LiWGmTbcVFa2XGuqSGttVWcqroWskHVCA7bvVSoulacsTeH3Ps4_Vxcms3gk3Uh0OimJRlUvK6V4ig2KT9IbZxSiq4z99EPFFeDYHZopjc7NLNDM1AaeDS9fspfmsG1fy1_KG2CDweB27785V00yXo3Wtf66Oxs2sn_P__iH7sNfvSWwp1bXeqnJW5Etz9M4gbMt722vTUUACixEg9TdJBd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629966213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dysocclusion after maxillofacial trauma: A 42 year analysis</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kommers, Sofie C ; van den Bergh, Bart ; Boffano, Paolo ; Verweij, Koen P ; Forouzanfar, Tymour</creator><creatorcontrib>Kommers, Sofie C ; van den Bergh, Bart ; Boffano, Paolo ; Verweij, Koen P ; Forouzanfar, Tymour</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of posttraumatic dysocclusion in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Patients and methods All patients who underwent surgical correction of a posttraumatic dysocclusion between 1970 and 2012 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 42 patients were included. Twenty-seven patients had a mandibular condyle fracture (64.3%). The initial fracture-treatment was either conservative, consisting only of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Though different orthognathic treatment options were used to regain normal occlusion, the most frequently used surgical techniques were a uni- or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible in 21 patients (50.0%), followed by a Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla in 17 patients (40.5%). Conclusions Most dysocclusions occur after mandibular condyle fractures, however fractures of other maxillofacial structures also account for a considerable number of cases. Good results are achieved with orthognathic surgery for posttraumatic dysocclusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23849246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Humans ; Jaw Fixation Techniques ; Male ; Malocclusion - surgery ; Mandible - surgery ; Mandibular Condyle - injuries ; Mandibular Fractures - complications ; Maxilla - surgery ; Maxillofacial Injuries - complications ; Middle Aged ; Open Bite - surgery ; Orthognathic surgery ; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Osteotomy, Le Fort - methods ; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods ; Posttraumatic dysocclusion ; Retrognathia - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Skull Fractures - complications ; Surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1083-1086</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23849246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kommers, Sofie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Bergh, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boffano, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verweij, Koen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forouzanfar, Tymour</creatorcontrib><title>Dysocclusion after maxillofacial trauma: A 42 year analysis</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of posttraumatic dysocclusion in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Patients and methods All patients who underwent surgical correction of a posttraumatic dysocclusion between 1970 and 2012 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 42 patients were included. Twenty-seven patients had a mandibular condyle fracture (64.3%). The initial fracture-treatment was either conservative, consisting only of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Though different orthognathic treatment options were used to regain normal occlusion, the most frequently used surgical techniques were a uni- or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible in 21 patients (50.0%), followed by a Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla in 17 patients (40.5%). Conclusions Most dysocclusions occur after mandibular condyle fractures, however fractures of other maxillofacial structures also account for a considerable number of cases. Good results are achieved with orthognathic surgery for posttraumatic dysocclusion.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw Fixation Techniques</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion - surgery</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - injuries</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - complications</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Maxillofacial Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Open Bite - surgery</subject><subject>Orthognathic surgery</subject><subject>Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Osteotomy, Le Fort - methods</subject><subject>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods</subject><subject>Posttraumatic dysocclusion</subject><subject>Retrognathia - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skull Fractures - complications</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1jAQhK2KipbCC_SAcuSSsGs7dgKoUtUCRarEAThbG8eRnDpJsRNE3r5J_8KBA6ddrWZG2m8YO0coEFC97YveDqnggKKAstjGETvFSle5RKyfbTsg5CVW_IS9SKkHAAVV_ZydcFHJmkt1yt5fr2myNizJT2NG3exiNtBvH8LUkfUUsjnSMtC77DKTPFsdxYxGCmvy6SU77igk9-ppnrEfnz5-v7rJb79-_nJ1eZvbEmHOa10KhLbRLVoi6LiWGmTbcVFa2XGuqSGttVWcqroWskHVCA7bvVSoulacsTeH3Ps4_Vxcms3gk3Uh0OimJRlUvK6V4ig2KT9IbZxSiq4z99EPFFeDYHZopjc7NLNDM1AaeDS9fspfmsG1fy1_KG2CDweB27785V00yXo3Wtf66Oxs2sn_P__iH7sNfvSWwp1bXeqnJW5Etz9M4gbMt722vTUUACixEg9TdJBd</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Kommers, Sofie C</creator><creator>van den Bergh, Bart</creator><creator>Boffano, Paolo</creator><creator>Verweij, Koen P</creator><creator>Forouzanfar, Tymour</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Dysocclusion after maxillofacial trauma: A 42 year analysis</title><author>Kommers, Sofie C ; van den Bergh, Bart ; Boffano, Paolo ; Verweij, Koen P ; Forouzanfar, Tymour</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw Fixation Techniques</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion - surgery</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - injuries</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - complications</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Maxillofacial Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Open Bite - surgery</topic><topic>Orthognathic surgery</topic><topic>Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Osteotomy, Le Fort - methods</topic><topic>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods</topic><topic>Posttraumatic dysocclusion</topic><topic>Retrognathia - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skull Fractures - complications</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kommers, Sofie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Bergh, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boffano, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verweij, Koen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forouzanfar, Tymour</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kommers, Sofie C</au><au>van den Bergh, Bart</au><au>Boffano, Paolo</au><au>Verweij, Koen P</au><au>Forouzanfar, Tymour</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dysocclusion after maxillofacial trauma: A 42 year analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1086</epage><pages>1083-1086</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of posttraumatic dysocclusion in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Patients and methods All patients who underwent surgical correction of a posttraumatic dysocclusion between 1970 and 2012 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 42 patients were included. Twenty-seven patients had a mandibular condyle fracture (64.3%). The initial fracture-treatment was either conservative, consisting only of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Though different orthognathic treatment options were used to regain normal occlusion, the most frequently used surgical techniques were a uni- or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible in 21 patients (50.0%), followed by a Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla in 17 patients (40.5%). Conclusions Most dysocclusions occur after mandibular condyle fractures, however fractures of other maxillofacial structures also account for a considerable number of cases. Good results are achieved with orthognathic surgery for posttraumatic dysocclusion.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23849246</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.013</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2014-10, Vol.42 (7), p.1083-1086
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1629966213
source Elsevier
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Dentistry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Humans
Jaw Fixation Techniques
Male
Malocclusion - surgery
Mandible - surgery
Mandibular Condyle - injuries
Mandibular Fractures - complications
Maxilla - surgery
Maxillofacial Injuries - complications
Middle Aged
Open Bite - surgery
Orthognathic surgery
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - methods
Osteotomy, Le Fort - methods
Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus - methods
Posttraumatic dysocclusion
Retrognathia - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Skull Fractures - complications
Surgery
Young Adult
title Dysocclusion after maxillofacial trauma: A 42 year analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A45%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dysocclusion%20after%20maxillofacial%20trauma:%20A%2042%20year%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Kommers,%20Sofie%20C&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1086&rft.pages=1083-1086&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629966213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-975310db7d1caa0f274704df235c4f227aba777c62a89934b16b32027a5616fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629966213&rft_id=info:pmid/23849246&rfr_iscdi=true