Loading…

Technical considerations of living donor hepatectomy of segment 2 grafts for infants

Background The selection of an adequate graft to mitigate the problems associated with a large-for-size graft is essential to ensure the success of liver transplantation for smaller children. Reduced left lateral segment (LLS) grafts have been introduced to overcome this issue. Methods Five infants...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery 2014-11, Vol.156 (5), p.1232-1237
Main Authors: Sakamoto, Seisuke, MD, PhD, Kanazawa, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD, Shigeta, Takanobu, MD, Uchida, Hajime, MD, Sasaki, Kengo, MD, Hamano, Ikumi, MD, Fukuda, Akinari, MD, PhD, Nosaka, Shunsuke, MD, PhD, Egawa, Hiroto, MD, PhD, Kasahara, Mureo, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The selection of an adequate graft to mitigate the problems associated with a large-for-size graft is essential to ensure the success of liver transplantation for smaller children. Reduced left lateral segment (LLS) grafts have been introduced to overcome this issue. Methods Five infants underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with segment 2 grafts. In the preoperative assessment, the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) and the ratio of the thickness of the donor LLS were used as a reference index for graft size matching, and a 3-dimensional (3D) computer-generated model of the donor liver was used for the analysis of the intrahepatic vasculature. During the donor operation, the relevant portal vein branches feeding to the reduced part of segment 3 were first exposed and divided, and then the parenchymal transection was performed. Results Segment 2 grafts were selected in 3 cases and reduced segment 2 grafts were selected in the other 2 cases. The graft reduction was achieved with 46.6 ± 8.2% of the actual LLS, and thus the GRWR was reduced from 5.33 ± 2.09% to 2.70 ± 0.82%. The actual graft thickness was reduced by approximately half after the graft reduction. Primary abdominal closure was performed in all of the recipients. No surgical complications occurred in any of the donors or recipients. Conclusion A segment 2 graft could be a valuable option for graft type selection in LDLT for smaller children. Precise planning using a 3D computer-generated model of the donor liver and meticulous operative procedures are necessary to obtain a viable graft.
ISSN:0039-6060
1532-7361
DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.003