Acute kidney injury defined according to the ‘Risk,’ ‘Injury,’ ‘Failure,’ ‘Loss,’ and ‘End-stage’ (RIFLE) criteria after repair for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

• Published in: Journal of vascular surgery 2014-11, Vol.60 (5), p.1159-1167.e1
• Main Authors: van Beek, Sytse C., MD, Legemate, Dink A., MD, PhD, Vahl, Anco, MD, PhD, Bouman, Catherine S.C., MD, PhD, Vogt, Liffert, MD, PhD, Wisselink, Willem, MD, PhD, Balm, Ron, MD, PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute Kidney Injury - blood; Acute Kidney Injury - diagnosis; Acute Kidney Injury - epidemiology; Acute Kidney Injury - mortality; Acute Kidney Injury - therapy; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery; Aortic Rupture - diagnosis; Aortic Rupture - mortality; Aortic Rupture - surgery; APACHE; Biomarkers - blood; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - mortality; Comorbidity; Creatinine - blood; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Incidence; Linear Models; Logistic Models; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Netherlands - epidemiology; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Surgery; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0741-5214; 1097-6809
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.072

Objective Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication after repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). In the present Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS)/International Society for CardioVascular Surgery (ISCVS) reporting standards patients are classified as no dialysis (grade I), as temporary dialysis (grade II), and as permanent dialysis or fatal outcome (grade III). However, AKI is a broad clinical syndrome including more than the requirement for renal replacement therapy. The recently introduced ‘Risk,’ ‘Injury,’ ‘Failure,’ ‘Loss,’ and ‘End-stage’ (RIFLE) classification for AKI comprises three severity categories based on serum creatinine and urine output (‘Risk,’ ‘Injury,’ and ‘Failure’). The objective of the present study was to assess the incidence of AKI using the RIFLE criteria (AKIRIFLE ). Secondary objectives were to assess the incidence of AKI as defined using the SVS/ISCVS reporting standards (AKISVS/ISCVS ) and the association between AKIRIFLE and death. Methods This was an observational cohort study in 362 consecutive patients with an RAAA in three hospitals in Amsterdam (The Netherlands) between 2004 and 2011. The end points were the incidence of AKIRIFLE, of AKISVS/ISCVS , and the combined 30-day or in-hospital death rate. A multivariable logistic regression model was made to assess the association between AKIRIFLE and death after adjustment for preoperative shock profile (Glasgow Aneurysm Score) and postoperative shock profile (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score, use of vasopressors, and fluid balance during the first 24 hours after intervention). Results AKIRIFLE occurred in 74% (267/362; 95% confidence interval [CI], 69%-78%), with 27% of these patients categorized as ‘Risk’ (71/267; 95% CI, 22%-32%), 39% categorized as ‘Injury’ (104/267, 95% CI, 33%-45%), and 34% categorized as ‘Failure’ (92/267; 95% CI, 29%-40%). AKISVS/ISCVS occurred in 48% (175/362; 95% CI, 43%-53%), with 53% of these categorized as ‘grade I’ (92/175; 95% CI, 45%-60%), 19% as ‘grade II’ (34/175; 95% CI, 14%-26%), and 28% as ‘grade III’ (49/175; 95% CI, 22%-35%). After multivariable adjustment for shock profiles the risk of dying in patients categorized as AKIRIFLE ‘Failure’ was greater than in patients without AKIRIFLE (adjusted odds ratio, 6.360; 95% CI, 2.231-18.130). Conclusions The incidence of AKI defined according to the RIFLE criteria (74%) was greater than defined using the SVS/ISCVS reporting standards (48%) a