Loading…

Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains

Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for acc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic entomology 1997-10, Vol.90 (5), p.1259-1266
Main Authors: Sharov, A.A, Liebhold, A.M, Roberts, E.A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3
cites
container_end_page 1266
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1259
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 90
creator Sharov, A.A
Liebhold, A.M
Roberts, E.A
description Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/90.5.1259
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16304994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16304994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFrGzEQhUVpIW6aY44FHUpJDuuMpN2V1VsITVtw6KEN5CbGWslWWEuqJB_876vUoac5zPcevI-QSwZLBkrcPFt7o2A5LBkf1BuyYEqsOq7Y01uyAOC8g16JM_K-lGcANnIGC1IfbN3FqVAXM93H4GvMPmxp3VlaUrY40ejo9pjKsb3rjl6tbfJTTNVm_ELXxz2Gmr2f0F7TFNNhxupjKNSHfx23KeGMZucx0Id4CBV9KB_IO4dzsRev95w83n_9ffe9W__89uPudt0ZsRK1YxPgSsIAEhX0vRXK2YkPtrdyGKVk48ilMIiD2Wyk2DDZuxUC2tFx0-ZN4px8PvWmHP8cbKl674ux84zBxkPRbBRNieob2J1Ak2Mp2Tqdst9jPmoG-sWtbm61Aj3oF7eN__RajMXg7DIG48v_EAfZtwUN-3jCHEaN29yQx19MKQkS-CjFX2GlhCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16304994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Sharov, A.A ; Liebhold, A.M ; Roberts, E.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharov, A.A ; Liebhold, A.M ; Roberts, E.A</creatorcontrib><description>Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/90.5.1259</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>AUTOCORRELATION ; Biological and medical sciences ; BOUNDARIES ; CONTROLE CONTINU ; DELIMITATION ; DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA ; DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION ; INVASION ; LIMITE ; LYMANTRIA DISPAR ; METHODE STATISTIQUE ; METODOS ESTADISTICOS ; MONITORING ; PHEROMONE TRAPS ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PIEGE SEXUEL ; POPULATION BOUNDARIES ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys ; SPREAD RATE ; STATISTICAL METHODS ; TRAMPAS SEXUALES ; VIGILANCIA ; VIRGINIA ; VIRGINIE ; VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE ; WEST VIRGINIA</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 1997-10, Vol.90 (5), p.1259-1266</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2074383$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharov, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, E.A</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><description>Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread</description><subject>AUTOCORRELATION</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BOUNDARIES</subject><subject>CONTROLE CONTINU</subject><subject>DELIMITATION</subject><subject>DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA</subject><subject>DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>INVASION</subject><subject>LIMITE</subject><subject>LYMANTRIA DISPAR</subject><subject>METHODE STATISTIQUE</subject><subject>METODOS ESTADISTICOS</subject><subject>MONITORING</subject><subject>PHEROMONE TRAPS</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PIEGE SEXUEL</subject><subject>POPULATION BOUNDARIES</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys</subject><subject>SPREAD RATE</subject><subject>STATISTICAL METHODS</subject><subject>TRAMPAS SEXUALES</subject><subject>VIGILANCIA</subject><subject>VIRGINIA</subject><subject>VIRGINIE</subject><subject>VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE</subject><subject>WEST VIRGINIA</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFrGzEQhUVpIW6aY44FHUpJDuuMpN2V1VsITVtw6KEN5CbGWslWWEuqJB_876vUoac5zPcevI-QSwZLBkrcPFt7o2A5LBkf1BuyYEqsOq7Y01uyAOC8g16JM_K-lGcANnIGC1IfbN3FqVAXM93H4GvMPmxp3VlaUrY40ejo9pjKsb3rjl6tbfJTTNVm_ELXxz2Gmr2f0F7TFNNhxupjKNSHfx23KeGMZucx0Id4CBV9KB_IO4dzsRev95w83n_9ffe9W__89uPudt0ZsRK1YxPgSsIAEhX0vRXK2YkPtrdyGKVk48ilMIiD2Wyk2DDZuxUC2tFx0-ZN4px8PvWmHP8cbKl674ux84zBxkPRbBRNieob2J1Ak2Mp2Tqdst9jPmoG-sWtbm61Aj3oF7eN__RajMXg7DIG48v_EAfZtwUN-3jCHEaN29yQx19MKQkS-CjFX2GlhCc</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Sharov, A.A</creator><creator>Liebhold, A.M</creator><creator>Roberts, E.A</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</title><author>Sharov, A.A ; Liebhold, A.M ; Roberts, E.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>AUTOCORRELATION</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BOUNDARIES</topic><topic>CONTROLE CONTINU</topic><topic>DELIMITATION</topic><topic>DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA</topic><topic>DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>INVASION</topic><topic>LIMITE</topic><topic>LYMANTRIA DISPAR</topic><topic>METHODE STATISTIQUE</topic><topic>METODOS ESTADISTICOS</topic><topic>MONITORING</topic><topic>PHEROMONE TRAPS</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PIEGE SEXUEL</topic><topic>POPULATION BOUNDARIES</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys</topic><topic>SPREAD RATE</topic><topic>STATISTICAL METHODS</topic><topic>TRAMPAS SEXUALES</topic><topic>VIGILANCIA</topic><topic>VIRGINIA</topic><topic>VIRGINIE</topic><topic>VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE</topic><topic>WEST VIRGINIA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharov, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, E.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharov, A.A</au><au>Liebhold, A.M</au><au>Roberts, E.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1259-1266</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1093/jee/90.5.1259</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 1997-10, Vol.90 (5), p.1259-1266
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16304994
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects AUTOCORRELATION
Biological and medical sciences
BOUNDARIES
CONTROLE CONTINU
DELIMITATION
DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA
DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION
INVASION
LIMITE
LYMANTRIA DISPAR
METHODE STATISTIQUE
METODOS ESTADISTICOS
MONITORING
PHEROMONE TRAPS
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
PIEGE SEXUEL
POPULATION BOUNDARIES
Protozoa. Invertebrates
Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys
SPREAD RATE
STATISTICAL METHODS
TRAMPAS SEXUALES
VIGILANCIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIE
VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE
WEST VIRGINIA
title Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-03T09%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20monitoring%20the%20spread%20of%20gypsy%20moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Lymantriidae)%20populations%20in%20the%20Appalachian%20Mountains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Sharov,%20A.A&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1259-1266&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/90.5.1259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16304994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16304994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true