Loading…
Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains
Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for acc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of economic entomology 1997-10, Vol.90 (5), p.1259-1266 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1266 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1259 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Sharov, A.A Liebhold, A.M Roberts, E.A |
description | Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jee/90.5.1259 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16304994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16304994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFrGzEQhUVpIW6aY44FHUpJDuuMpN2V1VsITVtw6KEN5CbGWslWWEuqJB_876vUoac5zPcevI-QSwZLBkrcPFt7o2A5LBkf1BuyYEqsOq7Y01uyAOC8g16JM_K-lGcANnIGC1IfbN3FqVAXM93H4GvMPmxp3VlaUrY40ejo9pjKsb3rjl6tbfJTTNVm_ELXxz2Gmr2f0F7TFNNhxupjKNSHfx23KeGMZucx0Id4CBV9KB_IO4dzsRev95w83n_9ffe9W__89uPudt0ZsRK1YxPgSsIAEhX0vRXK2YkPtrdyGKVk48ilMIiD2Wyk2DDZuxUC2tFx0-ZN4px8PvWmHP8cbKl674ux84zBxkPRbBRNieob2J1Ak2Mp2Tqdst9jPmoG-sWtbm61Aj3oF7eN__RajMXg7DIG48v_EAfZtwUN-3jCHEaN29yQx19MKQkS-CjFX2GlhCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16304994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Sharov, A.A ; Liebhold, A.M ; Roberts, E.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharov, A.A ; Liebhold, A.M ; Roberts, E.A</creatorcontrib><description>Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/90.5.1259</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>AUTOCORRELATION ; Biological and medical sciences ; BOUNDARIES ; CONTROLE CONTINU ; DELIMITATION ; DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA ; DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION ; INVASION ; LIMITE ; LYMANTRIA DISPAR ; METHODE STATISTIQUE ; METODOS ESTADISTICOS ; MONITORING ; PHEROMONE TRAPS ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PIEGE SEXUEL ; POPULATION BOUNDARIES ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys ; SPREAD RATE ; STATISTICAL METHODS ; TRAMPAS SEXUALES ; VIGILANCIA ; VIRGINIA ; VIRGINIE ; VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE ; WEST VIRGINIA</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 1997-10, Vol.90 (5), p.1259-1266</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2074383$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharov, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, E.A</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><description>Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread</description><subject>AUTOCORRELATION</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BOUNDARIES</subject><subject>CONTROLE CONTINU</subject><subject>DELIMITATION</subject><subject>DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA</subject><subject>DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>INVASION</subject><subject>LIMITE</subject><subject>LYMANTRIA DISPAR</subject><subject>METHODE STATISTIQUE</subject><subject>METODOS ESTADISTICOS</subject><subject>MONITORING</subject><subject>PHEROMONE TRAPS</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PIEGE SEXUEL</subject><subject>POPULATION BOUNDARIES</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys</subject><subject>SPREAD RATE</subject><subject>STATISTICAL METHODS</subject><subject>TRAMPAS SEXUALES</subject><subject>VIGILANCIA</subject><subject>VIRGINIA</subject><subject>VIRGINIE</subject><subject>VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE</subject><subject>WEST VIRGINIA</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFrGzEQhUVpIW6aY44FHUpJDuuMpN2V1VsITVtw6KEN5CbGWslWWEuqJB_876vUoac5zPcevI-QSwZLBkrcPFt7o2A5LBkf1BuyYEqsOq7Y01uyAOC8g16JM_K-lGcANnIGC1IfbN3FqVAXM93H4GvMPmxp3VlaUrY40ejo9pjKsb3rjl6tbfJTTNVm_ELXxz2Gmr2f0F7TFNNhxupjKNSHfx23KeGMZucx0Id4CBV9KB_IO4dzsRev95w83n_9ffe9W__89uPudt0ZsRK1YxPgSsIAEhX0vRXK2YkPtrdyGKVk48ilMIiD2Wyk2DDZuxUC2tFx0-ZN4px8PvWmHP8cbKl674ux84zBxkPRbBRNieob2J1Ak2Mp2Tqdst9jPmoG-sWtbm61Aj3oF7eN__RajMXg7DIG48v_EAfZtwUN-3jCHEaN29yQx19MKQkS-CjFX2GlhCc</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Sharov, A.A</creator><creator>Liebhold, A.M</creator><creator>Roberts, E.A</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</title><author>Sharov, A.A ; Liebhold, A.M ; Roberts, E.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>AUTOCORRELATION</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BOUNDARIES</topic><topic>CONTROLE CONTINU</topic><topic>DELIMITATION</topic><topic>DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA</topic><topic>DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>INVASION</topic><topic>LIMITE</topic><topic>LYMANTRIA DISPAR</topic><topic>METHODE STATISTIQUE</topic><topic>METODOS ESTADISTICOS</topic><topic>MONITORING</topic><topic>PHEROMONE TRAPS</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PIEGE SEXUEL</topic><topic>POPULATION BOUNDARIES</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys</topic><topic>SPREAD RATE</topic><topic>STATISTICAL METHODS</topic><topic>TRAMPAS SEXUALES</topic><topic>VIGILANCIA</topic><topic>VIRGINIA</topic><topic>VIRGINIE</topic><topic>VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE</topic><topic>WEST VIRGINIA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharov, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebhold, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, E.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharov, A.A</au><au>Liebhold, A.M</au><au>Roberts, E.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1259-1266</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), is gradually spreading in North America from New England to the west and south. Monitoring this expansion is important for evaluating effects of population management on the rate of gypsy moth spread, for planning areas regulated by domestic quarantine, and for accurate timing of preventive silvicultural measures. Spread rate was measured as the distance between population boundaries in consecutive years. Gypsy moth population boundaries from 1988 to 1995 were estimated in northwestern Virginia and southeastern West Virginia using counts of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Population boundaries estimated using the 10 moths per trap threshold were most stable in space and time compared with the boundaries estimated for other thresholds ranging from 1 to 300 moths per trap. Thus, the 10 moths per trap threshold is reliable for the monitoring of gypsy moth spread. Local spread rates were significantly autocorrelated in space (range, 80 km) but not in time. The rate of gypsy moth spread decreased from 16.9 km/yr in 1984-1990 to 8.8 km/yr in 1991-1996. An 8-km intertrap distance was adequate for detecting this decline in the rate of gypsy moth spread</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1093/jee/90.5.1259</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 1997-10, Vol.90 (5), p.1259-1266 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16304994 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | AUTOCORRELATION Biological and medical sciences BOUNDARIES CONTROLE CONTINU DELIMITATION DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA DISTRIBUTION GEOGRAPHIQUE Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION INVASION LIMITE LYMANTRIA DISPAR METHODE STATISTIQUE METODOS ESTADISTICOS MONITORING PHEROMONE TRAPS Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection PIEGE SEXUEL POPULATION BOUNDARIES Protozoa. Invertebrates Records, symptoms, damages, economic importance, population surveys SPREAD RATE STATISTICAL METHODS TRAMPAS SEXUALES VIGILANCIA VIRGINIA VIRGINIE VIRGINIE OCCIDENTALE WEST VIRGINIA |
title | Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian Mountains |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-03T09%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20monitoring%20the%20spread%20of%20gypsy%20moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Lymantriidae)%20populations%20in%20the%20Appalachian%20Mountains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Sharov,%20A.A&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1259-1266&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/90.5.1259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16304994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-1d0a870507a9044e39fed25e4e75677166273caa5cbb73b174f8a0ae6f2c162d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16304994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |