Single tactile afferents outperform human subjects in a vibrotactile intensity discrimination task

We simultaneously compared the sensitivity of single primary afferent neurons supplying the glabrous skin of the hand and the psychophysical amplitude discrimination thresholds in human subjects for a set of vibrotactile stimuli delivered to the receptive field. All recorded afferents had a dynamic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurophysiology 2014-11, Vol.112 (10), p.2382-2387
Main Authors: Arabzadeh, Ehsan, Clifford, Colin W G, Harris, Justin A, Mahns, David A, Macefield, Vaughan G, Birznieks, Ingvars
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Action Potentials
Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology
Female
Hand - physiology
Humans
Male
Neurons, Afferent - physiology
Physical Stimulation
Psychophysics
Touch Perception - physiology
Vibration
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We simultaneously compared the sensitivity of single primary afferent neurons supplying the glabrous skin of the hand and the psychophysical amplitude discrimination thresholds in human subjects for a set of vibrotactile stimuli delivered to the receptive field. All recorded afferents had a dynamic range narrower than the range of amplitudes across which the subjects could discriminate. However, when the vibration amplitude was chosen to be within the steepest part of the afferent's stimulus-response function the response of single afferents, defined as the spike count over the vibration duration (500 ms), was often more sensitive in discriminating vibration amplitude than the perceptual judgment of the participants. We quantified how the neuronal performance depended on the integration window: for short windows the neuronal performance was inferior to the performance of the subject. The neuronal performance progressively improved with increasing spike count duration and reached a level significantly above that of the subjects when the integration window was 250 ms or longer. The superiority in performance of individual neurons over observers could reflect a nonoptimal integration window or be due to the presence of noise between the sensory periphery and the cortical decision stage. Additionally, it could indicate that the range of perceptual sensitivity comes at the cost of discrimination through pooling across neurons with different response functions.
ISSN:0022-3077
1522-1598
DOI:10.1152/jn.00482.2014