Comparative Study of the Antennae of Dendroctonus rhizophagus and Dendroctonus valens (Curculionidae: Scolytinae): Sensilla Types, Distribution and Club Shape

We compared the antennae of two sibling bark beetle species, Dendroctonus rhizophagus Thomas and Bright and Dendroctonus valens LeConte, to identify biologically and taxonomically relevant differences. Specifically, we characterized the diversity of sensilla types by using environmental scanning ele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2014-11, Vol.107 (6), p.1130-1143
Main Authors: Lopez, Maria Fernanda, Armendariz-Toledano, Francisco, Samano, Jorge EMacias, Shibayama-Salas, Mineko, Zuniga, Gerardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Curculionidae
Dendroctonus
Dendroctonus valens
Rhizophagus
Scolytidae
Scolytinae
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We compared the antennae of two sibling bark beetle species, Dendroctonus rhizophagus Thomas and Bright and Dendroctonus valens LeConte, to identify biologically and taxonomically relevant differences. Specifically, we characterized the diversity of sensilla types by using environmental scanning electron microscopy, quantified the abundance and distribution of the different types of sensilla on the antennal club, and characterized club shape through multivariate and geometric morphometric analyses. We identified four classes of sensilla in both species: chaetica, fluted, trichodea (three distinct types), and basiconica (long and short). ANOVA and MANOVA demonstrated that the number and distribution of sensilla with the potential for chemoreception (i.e., short and long basiconica) differed between species and sexes. Notably, the long sensilla basiconica in the third sensory band were clustered in D. rhizophagus but not in D.valens. Geometric morphometric analysis using 27 landmarks showed that antennal club shape differed significantly between the two species and was not correlated with antennal size. The shape differences were associated with the number and distribution of sensilla.
ISSN:0013-8746
DOI:10.1603/AN13102