Benefit of slow titration of paroxetine to treat depression in the elderly

• Published in: Human psychopharmacology 2014-11, Vol.29 (6), p.544-551
• Main Authors: Olgiati, Paolo, Bajo, Emanuele, Serretti, Alessandro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; antidepressants; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation - administration & dosage; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation - economics; Computer Simulation; cost-benefit; Cost-Benefit Analysis; depression; Depressive Disorder, Major - drug therapy; Depressive Disorder, Major - economics; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; paroxetine; Paroxetine - administration & dosage; Paroxetine - economics; Patient Dropouts; pharmacoeconomics; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0885-6222; 1099-1077
• DOI: 10.1002/hup.2433

Objective Paroxetine is commonly used to treat depression in the elderly; however, titration issues have been raised. Rapid titration may lead to increased anxiety and early dropout. The aim of this cost–utility analysis was to compare the potential benefit of standard (10 mg the first day) versus slow titration (2.5 mg gradually increased). Methods Clinical analysis was based on a naturalistic trial integrated with a decision‐analytic model representing second treatments for those who initially did not respond and for dropout cases. Treatment setting was a public outpatient center for mental disorders in Italy. Service use data were estimated from best practice guidelines, whereas costs (Euros; 2012) were retrieved from Italian official sources. Results Slow titration approach produced 0.031 more quality‐adjusted life years (remission rate: 57% vs 44% in standard titration group) at an incremental cost of €5.53 (generic paroxetine) and €54.54 (brand paroxetine syrup). Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) values were €159 and €1768, respectively, in favor of slow titration approach. Cost‐effectiveness threshold, defined as ICER