Loading…

The Role of the Different CD34 Epitopes in Detection and Positive Selection of CD34 super(+) Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

Positive selection of CD34 super(+) cells is an attractive approach to reduce tumour cell contamination in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografts in malignancies not expressing CD34. All current selection methods use monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) specific for the cla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of immunology 1998-01, Vol.47 (1), p.82-90
Main Authors: Croockewit, A J, Raymakers, RAP, Preijers, FWMB, Vierwinden, G, De Witte, TJM
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title Scandinavian journal of immunology
container_volume 47
creator Croockewit, A J
Raymakers, RAP
Preijers, FWMB
Vierwinden, G
De Witte, TJM
description Positive selection of CD34 super(+) cells is an attractive approach to reduce tumour cell contamination in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografts in malignancies not expressing CD34. All current selection methods use monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) specific for the class I or class II CD34 epitopes, while for detection most investigators use class III MoAbs. Since the distribution of the different CD34 epitopes on haematopoietic progenitors differs, we studied their significance in CD34 super(+) selection procedures. Testing MoAbs against class I, II and III CD34 epitopes on normal BM we observed that plus or minus 23% of class III positive cells was class I negative. A higher expression of the class III epitope compared with classes I or II was observed on the KG1 cell line, whereas no differences in binding capability were found. The class III epitope anti-CD34, 561, was compared with the class I epitope anti-CD34, BI-3C5, both coupled to M450 Dynabeads. The yield of CD34 super(+) cells obtained with the 561 beads was 1.7% of the mononuclear cells versus 0.95% using the class I epitope, a 1.95-fold increase (1.3-2.7), whereas the purity was similar (96% in both cases). The absolute number of CD34 super(+) cells was therefore twofold higher after 561 selection, including cells with a more mature phenotype. In single cell assay comparable numbers of highly proliferative progenitors but higher numbers of differentiated colonies per phenotypic subfraction were measured. In conclusion, M450 beads coated with the 561 anti-class III CD34 epitope are more efficient in isolating CD34 super(+) cells from bone marrow, probably due to a broader distribution of the class III epitope.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16360989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16360989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_163609893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMFqAjEURbNQqLX9h7cqliLExqqzdcbiRpDqXoLewZSYF_My7S_42Q6tH-DqXi7n3I7qaaP1sBhPPx7Uo8i31iPzPjU9ddkeQV_sQVxTbnvl6hoJIVNZmTEtosscIeQCVcjYZ8eBbDjQmsVl9wPawN_m9uJPkiYiDd5eac4BtLIp8e-_g-TiEcl6mnvmA20yTlTCe3lS3dp6wfMt--rlc7Etl8OY-NxA8u7kZN-SNoAb2Y0mZqKLWWHuBq9B5lMV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16360989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of the Different CD34 Epitopes in Detection and Positive Selection of CD34 super(+) Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cells</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Croockewit, A J ; Raymakers, RAP ; Preijers, FWMB ; Vierwinden, G ; De Witte, TJM</creator><creatorcontrib>Croockewit, A J ; Raymakers, RAP ; Preijers, FWMB ; Vierwinden, G ; De Witte, TJM</creatorcontrib><description>Positive selection of CD34 super(+) cells is an attractive approach to reduce tumour cell contamination in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografts in malignancies not expressing CD34. All current selection methods use monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) specific for the class I or class II CD34 epitopes, while for detection most investigators use class III MoAbs. Since the distribution of the different CD34 epitopes on haematopoietic progenitors differs, we studied their significance in CD34 super(+) selection procedures. Testing MoAbs against class I, II and III CD34 epitopes on normal BM we observed that plus or minus 23% of class III positive cells was class I negative. A higher expression of the class III epitope compared with classes I or II was observed on the KG1 cell line, whereas no differences in binding capability were found. The class III epitope anti-CD34, 561, was compared with the class I epitope anti-CD34, BI-3C5, both coupled to M450 Dynabeads. The yield of CD34 super(+) cells obtained with the 561 beads was 1.7% of the mononuclear cells versus 0.95% using the class I epitope, a 1.95-fold increase (1.3-2.7), whereas the purity was similar (96% in both cases). The absolute number of CD34 super(+) cells was therefore twofold higher after 561 selection, including cells with a more mature phenotype. In single cell assay comparable numbers of highly proliferative progenitors but higher numbers of differentiated colonies per phenotypic subfraction were measured. In conclusion, M450 beads coated with the 561 anti-class III CD34 epitope are more efficient in isolating CD34 super(+) cells from bone marrow, probably due to a broader distribution of the class III epitope.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9475</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of immunology, 1998-01, Vol.47 (1), p.82-90</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Croockewit, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raymakers, RAP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preijers, FWMB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vierwinden, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Witte, TJM</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of the Different CD34 Epitopes in Detection and Positive Selection of CD34 super(+) Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cells</title><title>Scandinavian journal of immunology</title><description>Positive selection of CD34 super(+) cells is an attractive approach to reduce tumour cell contamination in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografts in malignancies not expressing CD34. All current selection methods use monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) specific for the class I or class II CD34 epitopes, while for detection most investigators use class III MoAbs. Since the distribution of the different CD34 epitopes on haematopoietic progenitors differs, we studied their significance in CD34 super(+) selection procedures. Testing MoAbs against class I, II and III CD34 epitopes on normal BM we observed that plus or minus 23% of class III positive cells was class I negative. A higher expression of the class III epitope compared with classes I or II was observed on the KG1 cell line, whereas no differences in binding capability were found. The class III epitope anti-CD34, 561, was compared with the class I epitope anti-CD34, BI-3C5, both coupled to M450 Dynabeads. The yield of CD34 super(+) cells obtained with the 561 beads was 1.7% of the mononuclear cells versus 0.95% using the class I epitope, a 1.95-fold increase (1.3-2.7), whereas the purity was similar (96% in both cases). The absolute number of CD34 super(+) cells was therefore twofold higher after 561 selection, including cells with a more mature phenotype. In single cell assay comparable numbers of highly proliferative progenitors but higher numbers of differentiated colonies per phenotypic subfraction were measured. In conclusion, M450 beads coated with the 561 anti-class III CD34 epitope are more efficient in isolating CD34 super(+) cells from bone marrow, probably due to a broader distribution of the class III epitope.</description><issn>0300-9475</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMFqAjEURbNQqLX9h7cqliLExqqzdcbiRpDqXoLewZSYF_My7S_42Q6tH-DqXi7n3I7qaaP1sBhPPx7Uo8i31iPzPjU9ddkeQV_sQVxTbnvl6hoJIVNZmTEtosscIeQCVcjYZ8eBbDjQmsVl9wPawN_m9uJPkiYiDd5eac4BtLIp8e-_g-TiEcl6mnvmA20yTlTCe3lS3dp6wfMt--rlc7Etl8OY-NxA8u7kZN-SNoAb2Y0mZqKLWWHuBq9B5lMV</recordid><startdate>19980101</startdate><enddate>19980101</enddate><creator>Croockewit, A J</creator><creator>Raymakers, RAP</creator><creator>Preijers, FWMB</creator><creator>Vierwinden, G</creator><creator>De Witte, TJM</creator><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980101</creationdate><title>The Role of the Different CD34 Epitopes in Detection and Positive Selection of CD34 super(+) Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cells</title><author>Croockewit, A J ; Raymakers, RAP ; Preijers, FWMB ; Vierwinden, G ; De Witte, TJM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_163609893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Croockewit, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raymakers, RAP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preijers, FWMB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vierwinden, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Witte, TJM</creatorcontrib><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Croockewit, A J</au><au>Raymakers, RAP</au><au>Preijers, FWMB</au><au>Vierwinden, G</au><au>De Witte, TJM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of the Different CD34 Epitopes in Detection and Positive Selection of CD34 super(+) Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cells</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of immunology</jtitle><date>1998-01-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>82-90</pages><issn>0300-9475</issn><abstract>Positive selection of CD34 super(+) cells is an attractive approach to reduce tumour cell contamination in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografts in malignancies not expressing CD34. All current selection methods use monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) specific for the class I or class II CD34 epitopes, while for detection most investigators use class III MoAbs. Since the distribution of the different CD34 epitopes on haematopoietic progenitors differs, we studied their significance in CD34 super(+) selection procedures. Testing MoAbs against class I, II and III CD34 epitopes on normal BM we observed that plus or minus 23% of class III positive cells was class I negative. A higher expression of the class III epitope compared with classes I or II was observed on the KG1 cell line, whereas no differences in binding capability were found. The class III epitope anti-CD34, 561, was compared with the class I epitope anti-CD34, BI-3C5, both coupled to M450 Dynabeads. The yield of CD34 super(+) cells obtained with the 561 beads was 1.7% of the mononuclear cells versus 0.95% using the class I epitope, a 1.95-fold increase (1.3-2.7), whereas the purity was similar (96% in both cases). The absolute number of CD34 super(+) cells was therefore twofold higher after 561 selection, including cells with a more mature phenotype. In single cell assay comparable numbers of highly proliferative progenitors but higher numbers of differentiated colonies per phenotypic subfraction were measured. In conclusion, M450 beads coated with the 561 anti-class III CD34 epitope are more efficient in isolating CD34 super(+) cells from bone marrow, probably due to a broader distribution of the class III epitope.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9475
ispartof Scandinavian journal of immunology, 1998-01, Vol.47 (1), p.82-90
issn 0300-9475
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16360989
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title The Role of the Different CD34 Epitopes in Detection and Positive Selection of CD34 super(+) Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A40%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20the%20Different%20CD34%20Epitopes%20in%20Detection%20and%20Positive%20Selection%20of%20CD34%20super(+)%20Bone%20Marrow%20and%20Peripheral%20Blood%20Stem%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20immunology&rft.au=Croockewit,%20A%20J&rft.date=1998-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=82-90&rft.issn=0300-9475&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E16360989%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_163609893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16360989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true