The Use of Infauna by Juvenile Penaeus aztecus Ives and Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus)

• Published in: Estuaries 1998-03, Vol.21 (1), p.160-175
• Main Authors: McTigue, Teresa Ann, Zimmerman, Roger J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algae; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Aquatic ecosystems; Biological and medical sciences; Brackish water ecosystems; Crustaceans; Diet; Estuaries; Food; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Marshes; Ocean fisheries; P values; Penaeus; Penaeus aztecus; Penaeus setiferus; Polychaeta; Predation; Prey; Prey selection; Salt marshes; Sediments; Shrimp; Synecology
• ISSN: 0160-8347; 1559-2723; 1559-2758; 1559-2731
• DOI: 10.2307/1352554

Penaeus aztecus Ives, the brown shrimp, and Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus), the white shrimp, co-occur in Texas salt marshes as juveniles. Although their life cycles are similar, evidence indicates that the species utilize different resources for the primary faunal element of their diets. Prey selection and growth studies have shown that brown shrimp successfully remove infauna from natural sediment. Further, a diet of polychaetes, whether alone or in combination with algae, produced growth in the species. Brown shrimp appear to be trophically linked to infaunal populations, thus the structure and dynamics of the benthic community may directly affect local brown shrimp productivity. Areas dominated by surface-dwelling polychaetes as opposed to deep burrowers may provide more accessible foraging opportunities for juvenile brown shrimp. By contrast, white shrimp neither removed infauna nor grew to a significant degree when provided polychaetes or amphipods as food. White shrimp are omnivorous but do not rely on infaunal material to the same extent as brown shrimp. The primary faunal element in the diet of white shrimp has not yet been identified. The dietary differences between the two species may play a role in determining which species dominates in regions with varying marsh accessibility. Although not the only factors influencing penaeid survival and growth, prey choice and availability may greatly affect production and local success of penaeid populations.