Echoes of the Tragedy: The Sport Memoir and the Representation of the 1950 World Cup

This article delves into the meaning of the 1950 World Cup, held in Brazil after a 12-year hiatus due to the Second World War and two decades after a South American country (Uruguay) had hosted the tournament. The aim of this paper is to reflect on the role of sport memoirs in the cementing of a col...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of the history of sport 2014-07, Vol.31 (10), p.1287-1302
Main Author: de Hollanda, Bernardo Borges Buarque
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Athletes
Autobiographical Materials
Brazil
Historical Development
History
Imagination
Journalists
Management
Memory
National identity
Rhetoric
sport narratives
Sports
Tragedy
Uruguay
World Cups
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article delves into the meaning of the 1950 World Cup, held in Brazil after a 12-year hiatus due to the Second World War and two decades after a South American country (Uruguay) had hosted the tournament. The aim of this paper is to reflect on the role of sport memoirs in the cementing of a collective imagination on the Brazilian National Team's defeat in 1950. Anchored on a triple dimension - organisational, tactical and technical - the analysis explores the way in which the loss of the title to the Uruguayan team was experienced by a number of actors - among them players, management personnel and fans - and set in writing by many generations of sports writers. Through the diachronic choice of works published by journalists (which include memoirs, news stories, biographies and autobiographies), the objective is to point to the congealing of a rhetoric made up of negative remarks associated to the football event, such as 'trauma', 'drama', 'tragedy' and even 'catastrophe'. Contemporary historical perspective, which questions the deep-rooted opposition between memory and history will be turned so as to support the consideration of whether the former can in fact direct, or even shape, the latter's features.
ISSN:0952-3367
1743-9035
DOI:10.1080/09523367.2014.886564