Inertial particle relative velocity statistics in homogeneous isotropic turbulence

• Published in: Journal of fluid mechanics 2012-04, Vol.696, p.45-66
• Main Authors: Salazar, Juan P. L. C., Collins, Lance R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Computational fluid dynamics; Exact sciences and technology; Fluid dynamics; Fluid flow; Fluid mechanics; Fluids; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); Inertia; Inertial; Isotropic turbulence; homogeneous turbulence; Kinetic energy; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Multiphase and particle-laden flows; Nonhomogeneous flows; Particle physics; Physics; Simulation; Stokes number; Turbulence; Turbulence simulation and modeling; Turbulent flow; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer; Velocity
• ISSN: 0022-1120; 1469-7645
• DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2012.2

In the present study, we investigate the scaling of relative velocity structure functions, of order two and higher, for inertial particles, both in the dissipation range and the inertial subrange using direct numerical simulations (DNS). Within the inertial subrange our findings show that contrary to the well-known attenuation in the tails of the one-point acceleration probability density function (p.d.f.) with increasing inertia (Bec et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 550, 2006, pp. 349–358), the opposite occurs with the velocity structure function at sufficiently large Stokes numbers. We observe reduced scaling exponents for the structure function when compared to those of the fluid, and correspondingly broader p.d.f.s, similar to what occurs with a passive scalar. DNS allows us to isolate the two effects of inertia, namely biased sampling of the velocity field, a result of preferential concentration, and filtering, i.e. the tendency for the inertial particle velocity to attenuate the velocity fluctuations in the fluid. By isolating these effects, we show that sampling is playing the dominant role for low-order moments of the structure function, whereas filtering accounts for most of the scaling behaviour observed with the higher-order structure functions in the inertial subrange. In the dissipation range, we see evidence of so-called ‘crossing trajectories’, the ‘sling effect’ or ‘caustics’, and find good agreement with the theory put forth by Wilkinson et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 97, 2006, 048501) and Falkovich & Pumir (J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 64, 2007, 4497) for Stokes numbers greater than 0.5. We also look at the scaling exponents within the context of the model proposed by Bec et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 646, 2010, pp. 527–536). Another interesting finding is that inertial particles at low Stokes numbers sample regions of higher kinetic energy than the fluid particle field, the converse occurring at high Stokes numbers. The trend at low Stokes numbers is predicted by the theory of Chun et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 536, 2005, 219–251). This work is relevant to modelling the particle collision rate (Sundaram & Collins, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 335, 1997, pp. 75–109), and highlights the interesting array of phenomena induced by inertia.