Active control of supersonic impingement tones using steady and pulsed microjets

• Published in: Experiments in fluids 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.841-855
• Main Authors: CHOI, Jae Jeen, ANNASWAMY, Anuradha M, HUADONG LOU, ALVI, Farrukh S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustics; Active control; Air transportation and traffic; Algorithms; Applied sciences; Exact sciences and technology; Fluid dynamics; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction; Microjets; Noise (turbulence generated); Noise reduction; Noise: its effects and control; Nozzles; Physics; Reduction; Shear layers; Strategy; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer
• ISSN: 0723-4864; 1432-1114
• DOI: 10.1007/s00348-006-0189-7

In recent years, it has been demonstrated that direct microjet injection into the shear layer of the main jet disrupts the feedback loop inherent in high speed impinging jet flows, thereby significantly reducing the adverse effects. The amount of noise reduced by microjet actuation is known to be dependent on nozzle operating conditions. In this paper, two active control strategies using microjets are suggested to maintain a uniform, reliable, and optimal reduction of these tones over the entire range of operating conditions. In the first method, a quasi-closed loop control strategy is proposed using steady microjet injection and the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) algorithm. The most energetic spatial mode of the unsteady pressure along the nozzle diameter is captured using the POD, which in turn is used to determine the distribution of microjet intensity along the nozzle exit. Preliminary experimental results from a STOVL supersonic jet facility at Mach 1.5 show that the quasi-closed loop control strategy, in some cases, provides an additional 8a10 dB reduction compared to axisymmetric injection at the desired operating conditions. The second method consists of a pulsed microjet injection, motivated by the need to further improve the noise suppression. It was observed that the pulsed microjet was able to bring about the same noise reduction as steady injection using approximately 40% of the corresponding mass flow rate of the steady microjet case. Moreover, as the duty cycle increased, the performance of pulsed injection was further enhanced and was observed to completely eliminate the impinging tones at all operating conditions.