Loading…

Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples

In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Talanta (Oxford) 2013-11, Vol.116, p.695-703
Main Authors: Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V., Hernández-Borges, Javier, Afonso, María M., Palenzuela, J. Antonio, Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3
container_end_page 703
container_issue
container_start_page 695
container_title Talanta (Oxford)
container_volume 116
creator Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.
Hernández-Borges, Javier
Afonso, María M.
Palenzuela, J. Antonio
Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel
description In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples. •A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642310436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039914013006334</els_id><sourcerecordid>1444856591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAIwBeskmxYztuVghV_EkjsYBZW9fJTeMqsTO2M515ZN4ClxbEritL9neOj-49RfGa0TWjrH6_XycYwSVYV5TxNVVrWtMnxYptFC-5VPxpsaKUN2XDBL0qXsS4p5RWnPLnxVUlmNiImq-KX1s_zRBs9I4YTAdERybYOUy2JeA64vx_F9MyJlseYByxIy0Ekx8dOJ8Wg7HsbJwxRHuPJPrRduU8QESCDylAm2xmWz8Z67L2YNNAslmAcrC7gWRd78MErkUy2rvFZvsh-AmS3wWYh0eSn0kakHSYMEzWwR9D35O4jL13MNkOc-BkjfU5aiTWkQNklkSY5hHjy-JZD2PEV-fzurj9_Onn9mt58_3Lt-3Hm7IVUqayBtqrDXIpayP6jVGtBIW1lILVStaSt9BQacCwasM5Nz1Xfc9Uo7qG16bp-HXx7uQ7B3-3YEx6srHFMS8L_RI1q0XFGRW8vozKSvCmUVRdRoUQmxyvYRmVJ7QNPsaAvZ6DnSA8akb1sTt6r8_d0cfuaKp07k7WvTl_sZgJu3-qv2XJwNsT0IPXsMul0bc_skOdi5WnoY4pP5wIzAO-txh0bC3mpXY2YJt05-2FEL8Ba5DoMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444856591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. ; Hernández-Borges, Javier ; Afonso, María M. ; Palenzuela, J. Antonio ; Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. ; Hernández-Borges, Javier ; Afonso, María M. ; Palenzuela, J. Antonio ; Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><description>In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples. •A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24148463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>adsorbents ; Adsorption ; Agglomeration ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation &amp; purification ; Antibiotics ; Carbon ; carbon nanotubes ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; detection limit ; Dispersive solid-phase extraction ; Extraction ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Limit of Detection ; Liquid chromatography ; Magnetic carbon nanotubes ; Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry ; Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure ; methanol ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; mineral content ; Mineral Waters - analysis ; nanoparticles ; Nanostructure ; scanning electron microscopy ; solid phase extraction ; Solid Phase Extraction - methods ; Sorbents ; sulfacetamide ; sulfadiazine ; sulfadimethoxine ; sulfadoxine ; sulfamerazine ; sulfamethoxazole ; sulfanilamide ; sulfisoxazole ; Sulfonamides ; Sulfonamides - isolation &amp; purification ; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography ; ultra-performance liquid chromatography ; Water ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 2013-11, Vol.116, p.695-703</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24148463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Borges, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, María M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples. •A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.</description><subject>adsorbents</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>detection limit</subject><subject>Dispersive solid-phase extraction</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Magnetic carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure</subject><subject>methanol</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>mineral content</subject><subject>Mineral Waters - analysis</subject><subject>nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>solid phase extraction</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Sorbents</subject><subject>sulfacetamide</subject><subject>sulfadiazine</subject><subject>sulfadimethoxine</subject><subject>sulfadoxine</subject><subject>sulfamerazine</subject><subject>sulfamethoxazole</subject><subject>sulfanilamide</subject><subject>sulfisoxazole</subject><subject>Sulfonamides</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAIwBeskmxYztuVghV_EkjsYBZW9fJTeMqsTO2M515ZN4ClxbEritL9neOj-49RfGa0TWjrH6_XycYwSVYV5TxNVVrWtMnxYptFC-5VPxpsaKUN2XDBL0qXsS4p5RWnPLnxVUlmNiImq-KX1s_zRBs9I4YTAdERybYOUy2JeA64vx_F9MyJlseYByxIy0Ekx8dOJ8Wg7HsbJwxRHuPJPrRduU8QESCDylAm2xmWz8Z67L2YNNAslmAcrC7gWRd78MErkUy2rvFZvsh-AmS3wWYh0eSn0kakHSYMEzWwR9D35O4jL13MNkOc-BkjfU5aiTWkQNklkSY5hHjy-JZD2PEV-fzurj9_Onn9mt58_3Lt-3Hm7IVUqayBtqrDXIpayP6jVGtBIW1lILVStaSt9BQacCwasM5Nz1Xfc9Uo7qG16bp-HXx7uQ7B3-3YEx6srHFMS8L_RI1q0XFGRW8vozKSvCmUVRdRoUQmxyvYRmVJ7QNPsaAvZ6DnSA8akb1sTt6r8_d0cfuaKp07k7WvTl_sZgJu3-qv2XJwNsT0IPXsMul0bc_skOdi5WnoY4pP5wIzAO-txh0bC3mpXY2YJt05-2FEL8Ba5DoMg</recordid><startdate>20131115</startdate><enddate>20131115</enddate><creator>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</creator><creator>Hernández-Borges, Javier</creator><creator>Afonso, María M.</creator><creator>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131115</creationdate><title>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</title><author>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. ; Hernández-Borges, Javier ; Afonso, María M. ; Palenzuela, J. Antonio ; Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>adsorbents</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>detection limit</topic><topic>Dispersive solid-phase extraction</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Magnetic carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure</topic><topic>methanol</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>mineral content</topic><topic>Mineral Waters - analysis</topic><topic>nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>solid phase extraction</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Sorbents</topic><topic>sulfacetamide</topic><topic>sulfadiazine</topic><topic>sulfadimethoxine</topic><topic>sulfadoxine</topic><topic>sulfamerazine</topic><topic>sulfamethoxazole</topic><topic>sulfanilamide</topic><topic>sulfisoxazole</topic><topic>Sulfonamides</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Borges, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, María M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</au><au>Hernández-Borges, Javier</au><au>Afonso, María M.</au><au>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</au><au>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>2013-11-15</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>695</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>695-703</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><abstract>In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples. •A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24148463</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-9140
ispartof Talanta (Oxford), 2013-11, Vol.116, p.695-703
issn 0039-9140
1873-3573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642310436
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects adsorbents
Adsorption
Agglomeration
Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation & purification
Antibiotics
Carbon
carbon nanotubes
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
detection limit
Dispersive solid-phase extraction
Extraction
Humans
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Limit of Detection
Liquid chromatography
Magnetic carbon nanotubes
Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry
Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure
methanol
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
mineral content
Mineral Waters - analysis
nanoparticles
Nanostructure
scanning electron microscopy
solid phase extraction
Solid Phase Extraction - methods
Sorbents
sulfacetamide
sulfadiazine
sulfadimethoxine
sulfadoxine
sulfamerazine
sulfamethoxazole
sulfanilamide
sulfisoxazole
Sulfonamides
Sulfonamides - isolation & purification
Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
ultra-performance liquid chromatography
Water
Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification
title Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20magnetic%20and%20non%20magnetic%20multi-walled%20carbon%20nanotubes-dispersive%20solid-phase%20extraction%20combined%20with%20ultra-high%20performance%20liquid%20chromatography%20for%20the%20determination%20of%20sulfonamide%20antibiotics%20in%20water%20samples&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Herrera-Herrera,%20Antonio%20V.&rft.date=2013-11-15&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=695&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=695-703&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1444856591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444856591&rft_id=info:pmid/24148463&rfr_iscdi=true