Loading…
Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples
In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazol...
Saved in:
Published in: | Talanta (Oxford) 2013-11, Vol.116, p.695-703 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3 |
container_end_page | 703 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 695 |
container_title | Talanta (Oxford) |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. Hernández-Borges, Javier Afonso, María M. Palenzuela, J. Antonio Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel |
description | In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples.
•A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642310436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039914013006334</els_id><sourcerecordid>1444856591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAIwBeskmxYztuVghV_EkjsYBZW9fJTeMqsTO2M515ZN4ClxbEritL9neOj-49RfGa0TWjrH6_XycYwSVYV5TxNVVrWtMnxYptFC-5VPxpsaKUN2XDBL0qXsS4p5RWnPLnxVUlmNiImq-KX1s_zRBs9I4YTAdERybYOUy2JeA64vx_F9MyJlseYByxIy0Ekx8dOJ8Wg7HsbJwxRHuPJPrRduU8QESCDylAm2xmWz8Z67L2YNNAslmAcrC7gWRd78MErkUy2rvFZvsh-AmS3wWYh0eSn0kakHSYMEzWwR9D35O4jL13MNkOc-BkjfU5aiTWkQNklkSY5hHjy-JZD2PEV-fzurj9_Onn9mt58_3Lt-3Hm7IVUqayBtqrDXIpayP6jVGtBIW1lILVStaSt9BQacCwasM5Nz1Xfc9Uo7qG16bp-HXx7uQ7B3-3YEx6srHFMS8L_RI1q0XFGRW8vozKSvCmUVRdRoUQmxyvYRmVJ7QNPsaAvZ6DnSA8akb1sTt6r8_d0cfuaKp07k7WvTl_sZgJu3-qv2XJwNsT0IPXsMul0bc_skOdi5WnoY4pP5wIzAO-txh0bC3mpXY2YJt05-2FEL8Ba5DoMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444856591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. ; Hernández-Borges, Javier ; Afonso, María M. ; Palenzuela, J. Antonio ; Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. ; Hernández-Borges, Javier ; Afonso, María M. ; Palenzuela, J. Antonio ; Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><description>In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples.
•A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-9140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24148463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>adsorbents ; Adsorption ; Agglomeration ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation & purification ; Antibiotics ; Carbon ; carbon nanotubes ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; detection limit ; Dispersive solid-phase extraction ; Extraction ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Limit of Detection ; Liquid chromatography ; Magnetic carbon nanotubes ; Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry ; Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure ; methanol ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; mineral content ; Mineral Waters - analysis ; nanoparticles ; Nanostructure ; scanning electron microscopy ; solid phase extraction ; Solid Phase Extraction - methods ; Sorbents ; sulfacetamide ; sulfadiazine ; sulfadimethoxine ; sulfadoxine ; sulfamerazine ; sulfamethoxazole ; sulfanilamide ; sulfisoxazole ; Sulfonamides ; Sulfonamides - isolation & purification ; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography ; ultra-performance liquid chromatography ; Water ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</subject><ispartof>Talanta (Oxford), 2013-11, Vol.116, p.695-703</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24148463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Borges, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, María M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</title><title>Talanta (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><description>In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples.
•A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.</description><subject>adsorbents</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>detection limit</subject><subject>Dispersive solid-phase extraction</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Magnetic carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure</subject><subject>methanol</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>mineral content</subject><subject>Mineral Waters - analysis</subject><subject>nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>solid phase extraction</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Sorbents</subject><subject>sulfacetamide</subject><subject>sulfadiazine</subject><subject>sulfadimethoxine</subject><subject>sulfadoxine</subject><subject>sulfamerazine</subject><subject>sulfamethoxazole</subject><subject>sulfanilamide</subject><subject>sulfisoxazole</subject><subject>Sulfonamides</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</subject><issn>0039-9140</issn><issn>1873-3573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAIwBeskmxYztuVghV_EkjsYBZW9fJTeMqsTO2M515ZN4ClxbEritL9neOj-49RfGa0TWjrH6_XycYwSVYV5TxNVVrWtMnxYptFC-5VPxpsaKUN2XDBL0qXsS4p5RWnPLnxVUlmNiImq-KX1s_zRBs9I4YTAdERybYOUy2JeA64vx_F9MyJlseYByxIy0Ekx8dOJ8Wg7HsbJwxRHuPJPrRduU8QESCDylAm2xmWz8Z67L2YNNAslmAcrC7gWRd78MErkUy2rvFZvsh-AmS3wWYh0eSn0kakHSYMEzWwR9D35O4jL13MNkOc-BkjfU5aiTWkQNklkSY5hHjy-JZD2PEV-fzurj9_Onn9mt58_3Lt-3Hm7IVUqayBtqrDXIpayP6jVGtBIW1lILVStaSt9BQacCwasM5Nz1Xfc9Uo7qG16bp-HXx7uQ7B3-3YEx6srHFMS8L_RI1q0XFGRW8vozKSvCmUVRdRoUQmxyvYRmVJ7QNPsaAvZ6DnSA8akb1sTt6r8_d0cfuaKp07k7WvTl_sZgJu3-qv2XJwNsT0IPXsMul0bc_skOdi5WnoY4pP5wIzAO-txh0bC3mpXY2YJt05-2FEL8Ba5DoMg</recordid><startdate>20131115</startdate><enddate>20131115</enddate><creator>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</creator><creator>Hernández-Borges, Javier</creator><creator>Afonso, María M.</creator><creator>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131115</creationdate><title>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</title><author>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V. ; Hernández-Borges, Javier ; Afonso, María M. ; Palenzuela, J. Antonio ; Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>adsorbents</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>detection limit</topic><topic>Dispersive solid-phase extraction</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Magnetic carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure</topic><topic>methanol</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>mineral content</topic><topic>Mineral Waters - analysis</topic><topic>nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>solid phase extraction</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Sorbents</topic><topic>sulfacetamide</topic><topic>sulfadiazine</topic><topic>sulfadimethoxine</topic><topic>sulfadoxine</topic><topic>sulfamerazine</topic><topic>sulfamethoxazole</topic><topic>sulfanilamide</topic><topic>sulfisoxazole</topic><topic>Sulfonamides</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Borges, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afonso, María M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrera-Herrera, Antonio V.</au><au>Hernández-Borges, Javier</au><au>Afonso, María M.</au><au>Palenzuela, J. Antonio</au><au>Rodríguez-Delgado, Miguel Ángel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples</atitle><jtitle>Talanta (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Talanta</addtitle><date>2013-11-15</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>695</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>695-703</pages><issn>0039-9140</issn><eissn>1873-3573</eissn><abstract>In this manuscript, a new method based on the use of off-line dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection was developed to determine 11 sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfadimidin, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfadoxine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole and sulfadimethoxine) in mineral waters with different mineral content. For this purpose, pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and magnetic-MWCNTs (m-MWCNTs) were used as sorbents. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by means of a solvothermal process, assembled onto CNTs through an “aggregation wrap” mechanism and characterized by scanning electron microscopy. Parameters affecting the extraction such as volume and pH of the sample, amount of sorbent and type and volume of eluent were optimized. Once optimum extraction conditions (250mL of water at pH 6.0 and elution with 25mL of MeOH) were obtained, the extraction efficiency of the different carbon nanomaterials was compared. Results demonstrated the higher extraction capacity of pristine MWCNTs with recoveries between 61 and 110% (except for sulfacetamide which ranged between 40 and 53%) and between 22 and 77% for m-MWCNTs. Limits of detection lower than 32ng/L were achieved for all of the analyzed samples.
•A dSPE–UHPLC-DAD method was developed to determine 11 sulfonamides in water.•Pristine and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were tested as sorbents.•Magnetic MWCNTs were synthetized by means of a solvothermal process.•Pristine MWCNTs showed the higher extraction capacity.•The procedure is simple, fast and reliable to determine the selected sulfonamides.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24148463</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-9140 |
ispartof | Talanta (Oxford), 2013-11, Vol.116, p.695-703 |
issn | 0039-9140 1873-3573 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642310436 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | adsorbents Adsorption Agglomeration Anti-Bacterial Agents - isolation & purification Antibiotics Carbon carbon nanotubes Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid detection limit Dispersive solid-phase extraction Extraction Humans Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Limit of Detection Liquid chromatography Magnetic carbon nanotubes Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry Magnetite Nanoparticles - ultrastructure methanol Microscopy, Electron, Scanning mineral content Mineral Waters - analysis nanoparticles Nanostructure scanning electron microscopy solid phase extraction Solid Phase Extraction - methods Sorbents sulfacetamide sulfadiazine sulfadimethoxine sulfadoxine sulfamerazine sulfamethoxazole sulfanilamide sulfisoxazole Sulfonamides Sulfonamides - isolation & purification Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography ultra-performance liquid chromatography Water Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification |
title | Comparison between magnetic and non magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes-dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in water samples |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20magnetic%20and%20non%20magnetic%20multi-walled%20carbon%20nanotubes-dispersive%20solid-phase%20extraction%20combined%20with%20ultra-high%20performance%20liquid%20chromatography%20for%20the%20determination%20of%20sulfonamide%20antibiotics%20in%20water%20samples&rft.jtitle=Talanta%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Herrera-Herrera,%20Antonio%20V.&rft.date=2013-11-15&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=695&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=695-703&rft.issn=0039-9140&rft.eissn=1873-3573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.07.060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1444856591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-6a0f78e3556b4f8b7c5a7e65541675653ca905bab128333bf37ff1797d936b9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444856591&rft_id=info:pmid/24148463&rfr_iscdi=true |