Loading…

Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against hospital admission for rotavirus diarrhoea in Brazilian children: a case-control study

Abstract Background In Brazil, before the introduction of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in 2006, between 22% and 38% of children younger than age 5 years admitted to hospital with diarrhoea had positive stool samples for rotavirus. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against hospital admission caused...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet (British edition) 2014-10, Vol.384, p.S16-S16
Main Authors: Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr, Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof, Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof, Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof, de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof, de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof, Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD, Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S16
container_issue
container_start_page S16
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 384
creator Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr
Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof
Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof
Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof
de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof
de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof
Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD
Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof
description Abstract Background In Brazil, before the introduction of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in 2006, between 22% and 38% of children younger than age 5 years admitted to hospital with diarrhoea had positive stool samples for rotavirus. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against hospital admission caused by the G2[P4] genotype in Brazil is estimated to be 40–85%. We estimated overall and genotype-specific vaccine effectiveness and the effect of time since vaccination on hospital admission for Brazilian children with rotavirus diarrhoea. Methods We did a case-control study of ten general hospitals from the Rotavirus Diarrhoea Surveillance System of five regions of Brazil, from July 2008, to August 2011. 215 patients (aged 4–24 months) with confirmed rotavirus diarrhoea were recruited and 1961 controls (admitted to hospital without diarrhoea) were frequency matched to cases by sex and age group. We estimated vaccine effectiveness with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for year of birth; sex and age; variance estimation of Jackknife (crude) and confounders (adjusted). Findings Two-dose crude vaccine effectiveness was 76% (95% CI 58–86), lasting for 2 years. Two-dose adjusted effectiveness was 72% (44–85), suggesting no noticeable confounding. 80 (51%) patients had genotype G2[P4] and 24 (15%) had G1[P8]. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness was 89% (78–95) for G1[P8] and 76% (64–84) for G2[P4]; 74% (35–90) for all G1, 76% (63–84) for all G2, and 63% (27–99) for all non-G1 or non-G2. One dose vaccine effectiveness for all genotypes was 62% (39–97). Interpretation Two-dose vaccine effectiveness for prevention of hospital admission with rotavirus diarrhoea was high, lasted for at least 2 years, and was similar for both G1[P8] and G2[P4]. On the basis of these findings we recommend the continued use of this vaccine in the Brazilian Immunization Program and monitoring of the emergence of unusual and novel rotavirus genotypes. Funding Health Surveillance of the Ministry of Health of Brazil.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61879-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642623763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0140673614618791</els_id><sourcerecordid>1642614049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2981-853e9f796e36849992f71193fbdee183d2274d8d3052707cdda1dbc79b75465e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiNEJZbCIyBZ4lIOKXbs2DEHEFQtIFXiAEjcLK89Yaek9uJJVtre-uZkdxFUvcBpLt__aWb-qnom-KngQr_8zIXitTZSnwj1QovO2Fo8qBZCGVW3ynx7WC3-II-qx0RXnHOlebuobs_7HsKIG0hAxHLPSh79BstEbONDwATMf_eYaGSrTGsc_cB8vEYizIn1udwJRPSlrDJ4hom9K_4GB_SJhRUOsUB6xTwLnqAOOY0lD4zGKW6fVEe9Hwie_p7H1deL8y9nH-rLT-8_nr29rENjO1F3rQTbG6tB6k5Za5veCGFlv4wAopOxaYyKXZS8bQw3IUYv4jIYuzSt0i3I4-rk4F2X_HMCGt18RIBh8AnyRE5o1ehGGi3_D50fquyMPr-HXuWppPmQmWp4azrZmZlqD1QomahA79YFr33ZOsHdrkO379DtCnJCuX2HTsy5N4cczI_ZIBRHASEFiFjm1lzM-E_D63uGMGDC4IcfsAX6u6yjxvGDZOcQam8Q8hcOBrlF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1620578387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against hospital admission for rotavirus diarrhoea in Brazilian children: a case-control study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr ; Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof ; Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof ; Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof ; de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof ; de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof ; Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD ; Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</creator><creatorcontrib>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr ; Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof ; Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof ; Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof ; de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof ; de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof ; Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD ; Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background In Brazil, before the introduction of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in 2006, between 22% and 38% of children younger than age 5 years admitted to hospital with diarrhoea had positive stool samples for rotavirus. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against hospital admission caused by the G2[P4] genotype in Brazil is estimated to be 40–85%. We estimated overall and genotype-specific vaccine effectiveness and the effect of time since vaccination on hospital admission for Brazilian children with rotavirus diarrhoea. Methods We did a case-control study of ten general hospitals from the Rotavirus Diarrhoea Surveillance System of five regions of Brazil, from July 2008, to August 2011. 215 patients (aged 4–24 months) with confirmed rotavirus diarrhoea were recruited and 1961 controls (admitted to hospital without diarrhoea) were frequency matched to cases by sex and age group. We estimated vaccine effectiveness with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for year of birth; sex and age; variance estimation of Jackknife (crude) and confounders (adjusted). Findings Two-dose crude vaccine effectiveness was 76% (95% CI 58–86), lasting for 2 years. Two-dose adjusted effectiveness was 72% (44–85), suggesting no noticeable confounding. 80 (51%) patients had genotype G2[P4] and 24 (15%) had G1[P8]. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness was 89% (78–95) for G1[P8] and 76% (64–84) for G2[P4]; 74% (35–90) for all G1, 76% (63–84) for all G2, and 63% (27–99) for all non-G1 or non-G2. One dose vaccine effectiveness for all genotypes was 62% (39–97). Interpretation Two-dose vaccine effectiveness for prevention of hospital admission with rotavirus diarrhoea was high, lasted for at least 2 years, and was similar for both G1[P8] and G2[P4]. On the basis of these findings we recommend the continued use of this vaccine in the Brazilian Immunization Program and monitoring of the emergence of unusual and novel rotavirus genotypes. Funding Health Surveillance of the Ministry of Health of Brazil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61879-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Children &amp; youth ; Diarrhea ; Genotypes ; Immunization ; Internal Medicine ; Patient admissions ; Rotavirus ; Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2014-10, Vol.384, p.S16-S16</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 19, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against hospital admission for rotavirus diarrhoea in Brazilian children: a case-control study</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Abstract Background In Brazil, before the introduction of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in 2006, between 22% and 38% of children younger than age 5 years admitted to hospital with diarrhoea had positive stool samples for rotavirus. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against hospital admission caused by the G2[P4] genotype in Brazil is estimated to be 40–85%. We estimated overall and genotype-specific vaccine effectiveness and the effect of time since vaccination on hospital admission for Brazilian children with rotavirus diarrhoea. Methods We did a case-control study of ten general hospitals from the Rotavirus Diarrhoea Surveillance System of five regions of Brazil, from July 2008, to August 2011. 215 patients (aged 4–24 months) with confirmed rotavirus diarrhoea were recruited and 1961 controls (admitted to hospital without diarrhoea) were frequency matched to cases by sex and age group. We estimated vaccine effectiveness with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for year of birth; sex and age; variance estimation of Jackknife (crude) and confounders (adjusted). Findings Two-dose crude vaccine effectiveness was 76% (95% CI 58–86), lasting for 2 years. Two-dose adjusted effectiveness was 72% (44–85), suggesting no noticeable confounding. 80 (51%) patients had genotype G2[P4] and 24 (15%) had G1[P8]. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness was 89% (78–95) for G1[P8] and 76% (64–84) for G2[P4]; 74% (35–90) for all G1, 76% (63–84) for all G2, and 63% (27–99) for all non-G1 or non-G2. One dose vaccine effectiveness for all genotypes was 62% (39–97). Interpretation Two-dose vaccine effectiveness for prevention of hospital admission with rotavirus diarrhoea was high, lasted for at least 2 years, and was similar for both G1[P8] and G2[P4]. On the basis of these findings we recommend the continued use of this vaccine in the Brazilian Immunization Program and monitoring of the emergence of unusual and novel rotavirus genotypes. Funding Health Surveillance of the Ministry of Health of Brazil.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Rotavirus</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiNEJZbCIyBZ4lIOKXbs2DEHEFQtIFXiAEjcLK89Yaek9uJJVtre-uZkdxFUvcBpLt__aWb-qnom-KngQr_8zIXitTZSnwj1QovO2Fo8qBZCGVW3ynx7WC3-II-qx0RXnHOlebuobs_7HsKIG0hAxHLPSh79BstEbONDwATMf_eYaGSrTGsc_cB8vEYizIn1udwJRPSlrDJ4hom9K_4GB_SJhRUOsUB6xTwLnqAOOY0lD4zGKW6fVEe9Hwie_p7H1deL8y9nH-rLT-8_nr29rENjO1F3rQTbG6tB6k5Za5veCGFlv4wAopOxaYyKXZS8bQw3IUYv4jIYuzSt0i3I4-rk4F2X_HMCGt18RIBh8AnyRE5o1ehGGi3_D50fquyMPr-HXuWppPmQmWp4azrZmZlqD1QomahA79YFr33ZOsHdrkO379DtCnJCuX2HTsy5N4cczI_ZIBRHASEFiFjm1lzM-E_D63uGMGDC4IcfsAX6u6yjxvGDZOcQam8Q8hcOBrlF</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof</creator><creator>Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof</creator><creator>Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof</creator><creator>de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof</creator><creator>de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof</creator><creator>Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD</creator><creator>Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against hospital admission for rotavirus diarrhoea in Brazilian children: a case-control study</title><author>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr ; Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof ; Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof ; Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof ; de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof ; de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof ; Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD ; Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2981-853e9f796e36849992f71193fbdee183d2274d8d3052707cdda1dbc79b75465e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Rotavirus</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ichihara, Maria Yury T, Dr</au><au>Rodrigues, Laura C, Prof</au><au>Teles Santos, Carlos Antonio S, Prof</au><au>Cruz Teixeira, Maria da Gloria L, Prof</au><au>de Jesus, Sandra R, Prof</au><au>de Matos, Sheila M Alvim, Prof</au><au>Leite, José P Gagliardi, PhD</au><au>Barreto, Mauricio L, Prof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against hospital admission for rotavirus diarrhoea in Brazilian children: a case-control study</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>384</volume><spage>S16</spage><epage>S16</epage><pages>S16-S16</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Abstract Background In Brazil, before the introduction of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in 2006, between 22% and 38% of children younger than age 5 years admitted to hospital with diarrhoea had positive stool samples for rotavirus. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against hospital admission caused by the G2[P4] genotype in Brazil is estimated to be 40–85%. We estimated overall and genotype-specific vaccine effectiveness and the effect of time since vaccination on hospital admission for Brazilian children with rotavirus diarrhoea. Methods We did a case-control study of ten general hospitals from the Rotavirus Diarrhoea Surveillance System of five regions of Brazil, from July 2008, to August 2011. 215 patients (aged 4–24 months) with confirmed rotavirus diarrhoea were recruited and 1961 controls (admitted to hospital without diarrhoea) were frequency matched to cases by sex and age group. We estimated vaccine effectiveness with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for year of birth; sex and age; variance estimation of Jackknife (crude) and confounders (adjusted). Findings Two-dose crude vaccine effectiveness was 76% (95% CI 58–86), lasting for 2 years. Two-dose adjusted effectiveness was 72% (44–85), suggesting no noticeable confounding. 80 (51%) patients had genotype G2[P4] and 24 (15%) had G1[P8]. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness was 89% (78–95) for G1[P8] and 76% (64–84) for G2[P4]; 74% (35–90) for all G1, 76% (63–84) for all G2, and 63% (27–99) for all non-G1 or non-G2. One dose vaccine effectiveness for all genotypes was 62% (39–97). Interpretation Two-dose vaccine effectiveness for prevention of hospital admission with rotavirus diarrhoea was high, lasted for at least 2 years, and was similar for both G1[P8] and G2[P4]. On the basis of these findings we recommend the continued use of this vaccine in the Brazilian Immunization Program and monitoring of the emergence of unusual and novel rotavirus genotypes. Funding Health Surveillance of the Ministry of Health of Brazil.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61879-1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2014-10, Vol.384, p.S16-S16
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1642623763
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Case studies
Children & youth
Diarrhea
Genotypes
Immunization
Internal Medicine
Patient admissions
Rotavirus
Vaccines
Viruses
title Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against hospital admission for rotavirus diarrhoea in Brazilian children: a case-control study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A53%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20rotavirus%20vaccine%20against%20hospital%20admission%20for%20rotavirus%20diarrhoea%20in%20Brazilian%20children:%20a%20case-control%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Ichihara,%20Maria%20Yury%20T,%20Dr&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=384&rft.spage=S16&rft.epage=S16&rft.pages=S16-S16&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61879-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1642614049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2981-853e9f796e36849992f71193fbdee183d2274d8d3052707cdda1dbc79b75465e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1620578387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true