Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays

As 3-D content migrates to the laptop, it is important to understand if customers can perceive quality differences between the 3-D technologies and to know if they feel any discomfort with close-up viewing of 3-D displays. In this study, we compared the quality and viewing comfort of active, passive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics in design 2014-07, Vol.22 (3), p.17-22
Main Authors: Burks, Rick, Harper, Christy, Bartha, Michael C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593
container_end_page 22
container_issue 3
container_start_page 17
container_title Ergonomics in design
container_volume 22
creator Burks, Rick
Harper, Christy
Bartha, Michael C.
description As 3-D content migrates to the laptop, it is important to understand if customers can perceive quality differences between the 3-D technologies and to know if they feel any discomfort with close-up viewing of 3-D displays. In this study, we compared the quality and viewing comfort of active, passive, and autostereoscopic (glasses-free) 3-D displays. We found that participants were able to discern differences in 3-D quality and comfort on laptop computer displays in realistic viewing conditions within a short period. Although the active and passive displays were comparable, the autostereoscopic display was rated lower in quality and viewing comfort.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1064804614526197
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1650520515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1064804614526197</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1650520515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwM2ZkMfg5ebYzorYUpEosZbac5CW4SuIQtxL996QqExLTDffdSXeM3YN4BND6CYTKjMgUZCgV5PqCzSSonKMw6SWbnWx-8q_ZTYw7IVBrbWaMr75d53vfN0nKl8mWys8-tKHxFBPfJxs37MOQLH0cWneMt-yqdm2ku1-ds4-X1Xbxyjfv67fF84aXKWR77kBQXtSgszTFrDZ1UaEhI0qFlaxllSuJhUSjoShM5SYs1ySVJFJaSszTOXs49w5j-DpQ3NvOx5La1vUUDtGCQoFSIOCEijNajiHGkWo7jL5z49GCsKdn7N9npgg_R6JryO7CYeynMf_zP5aKYDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1650520515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</source><creator>Burks, Rick ; Harper, Christy ; Bartha, Michael C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burks, Rick ; Harper, Christy ; Bartha, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><description>As 3-D content migrates to the laptop, it is important to understand if customers can perceive quality differences between the 3-D technologies and to know if they feel any discomfort with close-up viewing of 3-D displays. In this study, we compared the quality and viewing comfort of active, passive, and autostereoscopic (glasses-free) 3-D displays. We found that participants were able to discern differences in 3-D quality and comfort on laptop computer displays in realistic viewing conditions within a short period. Although the active and passive displays were comparable, the autostereoscopic display was rated lower in quality and viewing comfort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1064804614526197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Ergonomics in design, 2014-07, Vol.22 (3), p.17-22</ispartof><rights>2014 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34131,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burks, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><title>Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays</title><title>Ergonomics in design</title><description>As 3-D content migrates to the laptop, it is important to understand if customers can perceive quality differences between the 3-D technologies and to know if they feel any discomfort with close-up viewing of 3-D displays. In this study, we compared the quality and viewing comfort of active, passive, and autostereoscopic (glasses-free) 3-D displays. We found that participants were able to discern differences in 3-D quality and comfort on laptop computer displays in realistic viewing conditions within a short period. Although the active and passive displays were comparable, the autostereoscopic display was rated lower in quality and viewing comfort.</description><issn>1064-8046</issn><issn>2169-5083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F29</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwM2ZkMfg5ebYzorYUpEosZbac5CW4SuIQtxL996QqExLTDffdSXeM3YN4BND6CYTKjMgUZCgV5PqCzSSonKMw6SWbnWx-8q_ZTYw7IVBrbWaMr75d53vfN0nKl8mWys8-tKHxFBPfJxs37MOQLH0cWneMt-yqdm2ku1-ds4-X1Xbxyjfv67fF84aXKWR77kBQXtSgszTFrDZ1UaEhI0qFlaxllSuJhUSjoShM5SYs1ySVJFJaSszTOXs49w5j-DpQ3NvOx5La1vUUDtGCQoFSIOCEijNajiHGkWo7jL5z49GCsKdn7N9npgg_R6JryO7CYeynMf_zP5aKYDg</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Burks, Rick</creator><creator>Harper, Christy</creator><creator>Bartha, Michael C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F29</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays</title><author>Burks, Rick ; Harper, Christy ; Bartha, Michael C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burks, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics in design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burks, Rick</au><au>Harper, Christy</au><au>Bartha, Michael C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics in design</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>17-22</pages><issn>1064-8046</issn><eissn>2169-5083</eissn><abstract>As 3-D content migrates to the laptop, it is important to understand if customers can perceive quality differences between the 3-D technologies and to know if they feel any discomfort with close-up viewing of 3-D displays. In this study, we compared the quality and viewing comfort of active, passive, and autostereoscopic (glasses-free) 3-D displays. We found that participants were able to discern differences in 3-D quality and comfort on laptop computer displays in realistic viewing conditions within a short period. Although the active and passive displays were comparable, the autostereoscopic display was rated lower in quality and viewing comfort.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1064804614526197</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8046
ispartof Ergonomics in design, 2014-07, Vol.22 (3), p.17-22
issn 1064-8046
2169-5083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1650520515
source Sage Journals Online; Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)
title Examining 3-D Technologies in Laptop Displays
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A28%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%203-D%20Technologies%20in%20Laptop%20Displays&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics%20in%20design&rft.au=Burks,%20Rick&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=17-22&rft.issn=1064-8046&rft.eissn=2169-5083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1064804614526197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1650520515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a10e9bf1743354f8fbd58e80c65d2f2d9625b25871bb8da74397e262ee6722593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1650520515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1064804614526197&rfr_iscdi=true