Loading…

Pensions for Singles and Couples

Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Review of income and wealth 2014-09, Vol.60 (3), p.480-498
Main Author: Bradbury, Bruce
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913
container_end_page 498
container_issue 3
container_start_page 480
container_title The Review of income and wealth
container_volume 60
creator Bradbury, Bruce
description Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/roiw.12106
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1650529618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1650529618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1PwjAYB_DGaCKiFz_BEi_GZPg8fdt6VKKIEHwPx2ZsrRmODVsI8u0dTD140F7aw-__POmfkGOEDtbn3FX5qoMUQe6QFvJIhFwp3CUtAMZDKWK5Tw68nwKgpIK1SHBvSp9XpQ9s5YKnvHwtjA-SMgu61XJevw_Jnk0Kb46-7jZ5ub567t6Ew7tev3sxDFMRCRnyCVUKRGwzNBkTMgMWTWyikAJXVBiwkIBNKU4QgFsRq5QlQK3JbGwihaxNTpu5c1e9L41f6FnuU1MUSWmqpdcoBQiqJMb_UyE4BRUhq-nJLzqtlq6sP1IrHlMei-3us0alrvLeGavnLp8lbq0R9KZXvelVb3utMTZ4lRdm_YfUj3f98XcmbDK5X5iPn0zi3rSMWCT0eNTT4vLhdjCMB3rEPgHz8YZL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548248591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pensions for Singles and Couples</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Bradbury, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Appropriations and expenditures ; Australia ; consumer equivalence scales ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Cost and standard of living ; D13 ; Economic models ; Equivalence ; Expenditure ; Household consumption ; Households ; I38 ; J14 ; Pensions ; Retirement ; Retirement policies</subject><ispartof>The Review of income and wealth, 2014-09, Vol.60 (3), p.480-498</ispartof><rights>2014 International Association for Research in Income and Wealth</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27848,27849,27907,27908,33206,33207</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Pensions for Singles and Couples</title><title>The Review of income and wealth</title><addtitle>Review of Income and Wealth</addtitle><description>Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.</description><subject>Appropriations and expenditures</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>consumer equivalence scales</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost and standard of living</subject><subject>D13</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Expenditure</subject><subject>Household consumption</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>I38</subject><subject>J14</subject><subject>Pensions</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Retirement policies</subject><issn>0034-6586</issn><issn>1475-4991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1PwjAYB_DGaCKiFz_BEi_GZPg8fdt6VKKIEHwPx2ZsrRmODVsI8u0dTD140F7aw-__POmfkGOEDtbn3FX5qoMUQe6QFvJIhFwp3CUtAMZDKWK5Tw68nwKgpIK1SHBvSp9XpQ9s5YKnvHwtjA-SMgu61XJevw_Jnk0Kb46-7jZ5ub567t6Ew7tev3sxDFMRCRnyCVUKRGwzNBkTMgMWTWyikAJXVBiwkIBNKU4QgFsRq5QlQK3JbGwihaxNTpu5c1e9L41f6FnuU1MUSWmqpdcoBQiqJMb_UyE4BRUhq-nJLzqtlq6sP1IrHlMei-3us0alrvLeGavnLp8lbq0R9KZXvelVb3utMTZ4lRdm_YfUj3f98XcmbDK5X5iPn0zi3rSMWCT0eNTT4vLhdjCMB3rEPgHz8YZL</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Bradbury, Bruce</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Pensions for Singles and Couples</title><author>Bradbury, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Appropriations and expenditures</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>consumer equivalence scales</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost and standard of living</topic><topic>D13</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Expenditure</topic><topic>Household consumption</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>I38</topic><topic>J14</topic><topic>Pensions</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Retirement policies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of income and wealth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradbury, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pensions for Singles and Couples</atitle><jtitle>The Review of income and wealth</jtitle><addtitle>Review of Income and Wealth</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>480</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>480-498</pages><issn>0034-6586</issn><eissn>1475-4991</eissn><abstract>Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/roiw.12106</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6586
ispartof The Review of income and wealth, 2014-09, Vol.60 (3), p.480-498
issn 0034-6586
1475-4991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1650529618
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Appropriations and expenditures
Australia
consumer equivalence scales
Consumers
Consumption
Cost and standard of living
D13
Economic models
Equivalence
Expenditure
Household consumption
Households
I38
J14
Pensions
Retirement
Retirement policies
title Pensions for Singles and Couples
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A29%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pensions%20for%20Singles%20and%20Couples&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20income%20and%20wealth&rft.au=Bradbury,%20Bruce&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=480&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=480-498&rft.issn=0034-6586&rft.eissn=1475-4991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/roiw.12106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1650529618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548248591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true