Loading…
Pensions for Singles and Couples
Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Review of income and wealth 2014-09, Vol.60 (3), p.480-498 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913 |
container_end_page | 498 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 480 |
container_title | The Review of income and wealth |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Bradbury, Bruce |
description | Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/roiw.12106 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1650529618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1650529618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1PwjAYB_DGaCKiFz_BEi_GZPg8fdt6VKKIEHwPx2ZsrRmODVsI8u0dTD140F7aw-__POmfkGOEDtbn3FX5qoMUQe6QFvJIhFwp3CUtAMZDKWK5Tw68nwKgpIK1SHBvSp9XpQ9s5YKnvHwtjA-SMgu61XJevw_Jnk0Kb46-7jZ5ub567t6Ew7tev3sxDFMRCRnyCVUKRGwzNBkTMgMWTWyikAJXVBiwkIBNKU4QgFsRq5QlQK3JbGwihaxNTpu5c1e9L41f6FnuU1MUSWmqpdcoBQiqJMb_UyE4BRUhq-nJLzqtlq6sP1IrHlMei-3us0alrvLeGavnLp8lbq0R9KZXvelVb3utMTZ4lRdm_YfUj3f98XcmbDK5X5iPn0zi3rSMWCT0eNTT4vLhdjCMB3rEPgHz8YZL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548248591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pensions for Singles and Couples</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Bradbury, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Appropriations and expenditures ; Australia ; consumer equivalence scales ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Cost and standard of living ; D13 ; Economic models ; Equivalence ; Expenditure ; Household consumption ; Households ; I38 ; J14 ; Pensions ; Retirement ; Retirement policies</subject><ispartof>The Review of income and wealth, 2014-09, Vol.60 (3), p.480-498</ispartof><rights>2014 International Association for Research in Income and Wealth</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27848,27849,27907,27908,33206,33207</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Pensions for Singles and Couples</title><title>The Review of income and wealth</title><addtitle>Review of Income and Wealth</addtitle><description>Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.</description><subject>Appropriations and expenditures</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>consumer equivalence scales</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost and standard of living</subject><subject>D13</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Expenditure</subject><subject>Household consumption</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>I38</subject><subject>J14</subject><subject>Pensions</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Retirement policies</subject><issn>0034-6586</issn><issn>1475-4991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1PwjAYB_DGaCKiFz_BEi_GZPg8fdt6VKKIEHwPx2ZsrRmODVsI8u0dTD140F7aw-__POmfkGOEDtbn3FX5qoMUQe6QFvJIhFwp3CUtAMZDKWK5Tw68nwKgpIK1SHBvSp9XpQ9s5YKnvHwtjA-SMgu61XJevw_Jnk0Kb46-7jZ5ub567t6Ew7tev3sxDFMRCRnyCVUKRGwzNBkTMgMWTWyikAJXVBiwkIBNKU4QgFsRq5QlQK3JbGwihaxNTpu5c1e9L41f6FnuU1MUSWmqpdcoBQiqJMb_UyE4BRUhq-nJLzqtlq6sP1IrHlMei-3us0alrvLeGavnLp8lbq0R9KZXvelVb3utMTZ4lRdm_YfUj3f98XcmbDK5X5iPn0zi3rSMWCT0eNTT4vLhdjCMB3rEPgHz8YZL</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Bradbury, Bruce</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Pensions for Singles and Couples</title><author>Bradbury, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Appropriations and expenditures</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>consumer equivalence scales</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost and standard of living</topic><topic>D13</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Expenditure</topic><topic>Household consumption</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>I38</topic><topic>J14</topic><topic>Pensions</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Retirement policies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of income and wealth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradbury, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pensions for Singles and Couples</atitle><jtitle>The Review of income and wealth</jtitle><addtitle>Review of Income and Wealth</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>480</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>480-498</pages><issn>0034-6586</issn><eissn>1475-4991</eissn><abstract>Retirement policies often seek to set pensions at levels that enable single and married pensioners to have the same standard of living. The existing literature on consumer equivalence scales provides little assistance in reaching this policy objective, as the estimated scales are both imprecise and reliant upon strong and opaque assumptions. This paper proposes an alternative modeling strategy which has low data requirements and involves the use of detailed, but transparent, assumptions about the extent of joint consumption of particular commodities. These assumptions are embedded in an economic model of household consumption and combined with household expenditure data to calculate consumer equivalence scales. It is estimated that, in 2003–04, Australian couples of Age Pension age who owned their own home needed expenditures between 1.32 and 1.60 times that of a single person. These scales were lower than those used in the pension system.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/roiw.12106</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6586 |
ispartof | The Review of income and wealth, 2014-09, Vol.60 (3), p.480-498 |
issn | 0034-6586 1475-4991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1650529618 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Appropriations and expenditures Australia consumer equivalence scales Consumers Consumption Cost and standard of living D13 Economic models Equivalence Expenditure Household consumption Households I38 J14 Pensions Retirement Retirement policies |
title | Pensions for Singles and Couples |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A29%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pensions%20for%20Singles%20and%20Couples&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20income%20and%20wealth&rft.au=Bradbury,%20Bruce&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=480&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=480-498&rft.issn=0034-6586&rft.eissn=1475-4991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/roiw.12106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1650529618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-4b299058fd1ed356d037bfa91204925e0f0a0fc21b1004f589c3a02fedf8e7913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548248591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |