Loading…
Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria
There is increasing evidence showing that ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are major contributors to N2O emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Although the fundamental metabolic pathways for N2O production by AOB are now coming to light, the mechanisms responsible for N2O production by...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biotechnology and bioengineering 2013-01, Vol.110 (1), p.153-163 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773 |
container_end_page | 163 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Biotechnology and bioengineering |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Ni, Bing-Jie Yuan, Zhiguo Chandran, Kartik Vanrolleghem, Peter A. Murthy, Sudhir |
description | There is increasing evidence showing that ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are major contributors to N2O emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Although the fundamental metabolic pathways for N2O production by AOB are now coming to light, the mechanisms responsible for N2O production by AOB in WWTP are not fully understood. Mathematical modeling provides a means for testing hypotheses related to mechanisms and triggers for N2O emissions in WWTP, and can then also become a tool to support the development of mitigation strategies. This study examined the ability of four mathematical model structures to describe two distinct mechanisms of N2O production by AOB. The production mechanisms evaluated are (1) N2O as the final product of nitrifier denitrification with NO 2− as the terminal electron acceptor and (2) N2O as a byproduct of incomplete oxidation of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) to NO 2−. The four models were compared based on their ability to predict N2O dynamics observed in three mixed culture studies. Short‐term batch experimental data were employed to examine model assumptions related to the effects of (1) NH 4+ concentration variations, (2) dissolved oxygen (DO) variations, (3) NO 2− accumulations and (4) NH2OH as an externally provided substrate. The modeling results demonstrate that all these models can generally describe the NH 4+, NO 2−, and NO 3− data. However, none of these models were able to reproduce all measured N2O data. The results suggest that both the denitrification and NH2OH pathways may be involved in N2O production and could be kinetically linked by a competition for intracellular reducing equivalents. A unified model capturing both mechanisms and their potential interactions needs to be developed with consideration of physiological complexity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 153–163. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Reaction schemes used in the four N2O models evaluated in this study—(A) Model I: AOB denitrification pathway with NH2OH as the electron donor; (B) Model II: AOB denitrification pathway with NH3 as the electron donor; (C) Model III: the NH2OH/NOH pathway; and (D) Model IV: the NH2OH/NO pathway. Schematics adapted from Stein (2011a) and Chandran et al. (2011). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bit.24620 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651383878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1651383878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtvFDEUhS0EIptAwR9AlmhIMYnfjxKWkARFoVlEaXk8HuJlZrzYHsjy6_GySQoklMZX1v3usc89ALzC6AQjRE7bUE4IEwQ9AQuMtGwQ0egpWCCEREO5JgfgMOd1vUolxHNwQIiilGG-AOuzn3aYbQnTN9jHOcHRlhtfj-DsAMfY-SHXRoJTKCnOGcbb0Hm4SbGbXQlxgu0W2rnE2t3cBAftOMYp2GbHhd872da64lOwL8Cz3g7Zv7yrR-DLx7PV8qK5-nx-uXx31ThOKGoYsswSJh131QtHynGpVSdt7zsqhNK2RYwhIgmlAvmuwsp2AmktiOylpEfg7V63fvLH7HMxY8jOD4OdfHVgsOCYKqqkehxltL7EMdePo1gJTRhTuKJv_kHXdbNT9byjFKmZCVap4z3lUsw5-d5sUhht2hqMzC5WU2M1f2Ot7Os7xbkdffdA3udYgdM98CsMfvt_JfP-cnUv2ewnQi7-9mHCpu9GSCq5-Xp9bvTyeiUvPijzif4BW2-54w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1188210064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ni, Bing-Jie ; Yuan, Zhiguo ; Chandran, Kartik ; Vanrolleghem, Peter A. ; Murthy, Sudhir</creator><creatorcontrib>Ni, Bing-Jie ; Yuan, Zhiguo ; Chandran, Kartik ; Vanrolleghem, Peter A. ; Murthy, Sudhir</creatorcontrib><description>There is increasing evidence showing that ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are major contributors to N2O emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Although the fundamental metabolic pathways for N2O production by AOB are now coming to light, the mechanisms responsible for N2O production by AOB in WWTP are not fully understood. Mathematical modeling provides a means for testing hypotheses related to mechanisms and triggers for N2O emissions in WWTP, and can then also become a tool to support the development of mitigation strategies. This study examined the ability of four mathematical model structures to describe two distinct mechanisms of N2O production by AOB. The production mechanisms evaluated are (1) N2O as the final product of nitrifier denitrification with NO 2− as the terminal electron acceptor and (2) N2O as a byproduct of incomplete oxidation of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) to NO 2−. The four models were compared based on their ability to predict N2O dynamics observed in three mixed culture studies. Short‐term batch experimental data were employed to examine model assumptions related to the effects of (1) NH 4+ concentration variations, (2) dissolved oxygen (DO) variations, (3) NO 2− accumulations and (4) NH2OH as an externally provided substrate. The modeling results demonstrate that all these models can generally describe the NH 4+, NO 2−, and NO 3− data. However, none of these models were able to reproduce all measured N2O data. The results suggest that both the denitrification and NH2OH pathways may be involved in N2O production and could be kinetically linked by a competition for intracellular reducing equivalents. A unified model capturing both mechanisms and their potential interactions needs to be developed with consideration of physiological complexity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 153–163. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Reaction schemes used in the four N2O models evaluated in this study—(A) Model I: AOB denitrification pathway with NH2OH as the electron donor; (B) Model II: AOB denitrification pathway with NH3 as the electron donor; (C) Model III: the NH2OH/NOH pathway; and (D) Model IV: the NH2OH/NO pathway. Schematics adapted from Stein (2011a) and Chandran et al. (2011).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bit.24620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22833415</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIBIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Ammonia - metabolism ; ammonia-oxidizing bacteria ; Autotrophic Processes - physiology ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - metabolism ; Bioengineering ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Denitrification ; Dissolution ; hydroxylamine ; mathematical model ; Mathematical models ; mechanisms ; Models, Biological ; nitrifier denitrification ; nitrous oxide ; Nitrous Oxide - metabolism ; Nitrous oxides ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Oxygen - metabolism ; Pathways ; Substrates ; Symbols ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2013-01, Vol.110 (1), p.153-163</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22833415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ni, Bing-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Zhiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandran, Kartik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanrolleghem, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sudhir</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</title><title>Biotechnology and bioengineering</title><addtitle>Biotechnol. Bioeng</addtitle><description>There is increasing evidence showing that ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are major contributors to N2O emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Although the fundamental metabolic pathways for N2O production by AOB are now coming to light, the mechanisms responsible for N2O production by AOB in WWTP are not fully understood. Mathematical modeling provides a means for testing hypotheses related to mechanisms and triggers for N2O emissions in WWTP, and can then also become a tool to support the development of mitigation strategies. This study examined the ability of four mathematical model structures to describe two distinct mechanisms of N2O production by AOB. The production mechanisms evaluated are (1) N2O as the final product of nitrifier denitrification with NO 2− as the terminal electron acceptor and (2) N2O as a byproduct of incomplete oxidation of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) to NO 2−. The four models were compared based on their ability to predict N2O dynamics observed in three mixed culture studies. Short‐term batch experimental data were employed to examine model assumptions related to the effects of (1) NH 4+ concentration variations, (2) dissolved oxygen (DO) variations, (3) NO 2− accumulations and (4) NH2OH as an externally provided substrate. The modeling results demonstrate that all these models can generally describe the NH 4+, NO 2−, and NO 3− data. However, none of these models were able to reproduce all measured N2O data. The results suggest that both the denitrification and NH2OH pathways may be involved in N2O production and could be kinetically linked by a competition for intracellular reducing equivalents. A unified model capturing both mechanisms and their potential interactions needs to be developed with consideration of physiological complexity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 153–163. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Reaction schemes used in the four N2O models evaluated in this study—(A) Model I: AOB denitrification pathway with NH2OH as the electron donor; (B) Model II: AOB denitrification pathway with NH3 as the electron donor; (C) Model III: the NH2OH/NOH pathway; and (D) Model IV: the NH2OH/NO pathway. Schematics adapted from Stein (2011a) and Chandran et al. (2011).</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonia - metabolism</subject><subject>ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</subject><subject>Autotrophic Processes - physiology</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>hydroxylamine</subject><subject>mathematical model</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>mechanisms</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>nitrifier denitrification</subject><subject>nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous Oxide - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrous oxides</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>Pathways</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Symbols</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkTtvFDEUhS0EIptAwR9AlmhIMYnfjxKWkARFoVlEaXk8HuJlZrzYHsjy6_GySQoklMZX1v3usc89ALzC6AQjRE7bUE4IEwQ9AQuMtGwQ0egpWCCEREO5JgfgMOd1vUolxHNwQIiilGG-AOuzn3aYbQnTN9jHOcHRlhtfj-DsAMfY-SHXRoJTKCnOGcbb0Hm4SbGbXQlxgu0W2rnE2t3cBAftOMYp2GbHhd872da64lOwL8Cz3g7Zv7yrR-DLx7PV8qK5-nx-uXx31ThOKGoYsswSJh131QtHynGpVSdt7zsqhNK2RYwhIgmlAvmuwsp2AmktiOylpEfg7V63fvLH7HMxY8jOD4OdfHVgsOCYKqqkehxltL7EMdePo1gJTRhTuKJv_kHXdbNT9byjFKmZCVap4z3lUsw5-d5sUhht2hqMzC5WU2M1f2Ot7Os7xbkdffdA3udYgdM98CsMfvt_JfP-cnUv2ewnQi7-9mHCpu9GSCq5-Xp9bvTyeiUvPijzif4BW2-54w</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Ni, Bing-Jie</creator><creator>Yuan, Zhiguo</creator><creator>Chandran, Kartik</creator><creator>Vanrolleghem, Peter A.</creator><creator>Murthy, Sudhir</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</title><author>Ni, Bing-Jie ; Yuan, Zhiguo ; Chandran, Kartik ; Vanrolleghem, Peter A. ; Murthy, Sudhir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonia - metabolism</topic><topic>ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</topic><topic>Autotrophic Processes - physiology</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>hydroxylamine</topic><topic>mathematical model</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>mechanisms</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>nitrifier denitrification</topic><topic>nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous Oxide - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrous oxides</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>Pathways</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Symbols</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ni, Bing-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Zhiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandran, Kartik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanrolleghem, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sudhir</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ni, Bing-Jie</au><au>Yuan, Zhiguo</au><au>Chandran, Kartik</au><au>Vanrolleghem, Peter A.</au><au>Murthy, Sudhir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol. Bioeng</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>153-163</pages><issn>0006-3592</issn><eissn>1097-0290</eissn><coden>BIBIAU</coden><abstract>There is increasing evidence showing that ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are major contributors to N2O emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Although the fundamental metabolic pathways for N2O production by AOB are now coming to light, the mechanisms responsible for N2O production by AOB in WWTP are not fully understood. Mathematical modeling provides a means for testing hypotheses related to mechanisms and triggers for N2O emissions in WWTP, and can then also become a tool to support the development of mitigation strategies. This study examined the ability of four mathematical model structures to describe two distinct mechanisms of N2O production by AOB. The production mechanisms evaluated are (1) N2O as the final product of nitrifier denitrification with NO 2− as the terminal electron acceptor and (2) N2O as a byproduct of incomplete oxidation of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) to NO 2−. The four models were compared based on their ability to predict N2O dynamics observed in three mixed culture studies. Short‐term batch experimental data were employed to examine model assumptions related to the effects of (1) NH 4+ concentration variations, (2) dissolved oxygen (DO) variations, (3) NO 2− accumulations and (4) NH2OH as an externally provided substrate. The modeling results demonstrate that all these models can generally describe the NH 4+, NO 2−, and NO 3− data. However, none of these models were able to reproduce all measured N2O data. The results suggest that both the denitrification and NH2OH pathways may be involved in N2O production and could be kinetically linked by a competition for intracellular reducing equivalents. A unified model capturing both mechanisms and their potential interactions needs to be developed with consideration of physiological complexity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 153–163. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Reaction schemes used in the four N2O models evaluated in this study—(A) Model I: AOB denitrification pathway with NH2OH as the electron donor; (B) Model II: AOB denitrification pathway with NH3 as the electron donor; (C) Model III: the NH2OH/NOH pathway; and (D) Model IV: the NH2OH/NO pathway. Schematics adapted from Stein (2011a) and Chandran et al. (2011).</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22833415</pmid><doi>10.1002/bit.24620</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3592 |
ispartof | Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2013-01, Vol.110 (1), p.153-163 |
issn | 0006-3592 1097-0290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651383878 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Ammonia Ammonia - metabolism ammonia-oxidizing bacteria Autotrophic Processes - physiology Bacteria Bacteria - metabolism Bioengineering Bioreactors - microbiology Denitrification Dissolution hydroxylamine mathematical model Mathematical models mechanisms Models, Biological nitrifier denitrification nitrous oxide Nitrous Oxide - metabolism Nitrous oxides Oxidation-Reduction Oxygen - metabolism Pathways Substrates Symbols Water treatment plants |
title | Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20four%20mathematical%20models%20for%20nitrous%20oxide%20production%20by%20autotrophic%20ammonia-oxidizing%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Ni,%20Bing-Jie&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=153-163&rft.issn=0006-3592&rft.eissn=1097-0290&rft.coden=BIBIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bit.24620&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651383878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5230-40a4a247c5c109508c5798d7afed36689ab04402723360ed4a28ad6099627f773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1188210064&rft_id=info:pmid/22833415&rfr_iscdi=true |