Loading…

Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes

Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2014-03, Vol.473-474, p.159-170
Main Authors: Booker, Victoria, Halsall, Crispin, Llewellyn, Neville, Johnson, Andrew, Williams, Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53
container_end_page 170
container_issue
container_start_page 159
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 473-474
creator Booker, Victoria
Halsall, Crispin
Llewellyn, Neville
Johnson, Andrew
Williams, Richard
description Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes. [Display omitted] •We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651416612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969713014496</els_id><sourcerecordid>1651416612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EglL4BciSTYIn8SNZVoiXVAkWIJaW40wqlyYudoLE3-OohS3Mxhr5zFzNvYRcAs2AgrheZ8HYwQ3Yf2Y5hSIDyIDxAzKDUlYp0FwckhmlrEwrUckTchrCmsaSJRyTk5wVosorNiNvz946bwcbbL9KdD9Yo3uDPmn8uApJ63wSNax3fYf9oDdJ5_oo7Hd0k3gb3hMdAoYwAcl29FsXuzNy1OpNwPP9Oyevd7cvNw_p8un-8WaxTA0rxZCWDCU0bV222BSMV5pKbipW11i0YHSFoGUpW8OBl4byoijiSYy1oqkx_vNiTq52e7fefYwYBtXZYHCz0T26MSgQHBgIAfk_UCZpDlxOqNyhxrsQPLZq622n_ZcCqqYA1Fr9BqCmABSAigHEyYu9yFh32PzO_TgegcUOwOjKp0U_LcJoeWM9mkE1zv4p8g2XPp21</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647021572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Booker, Victoria ; Halsall, Crispin ; Llewellyn, Neville ; Johnson, Andrew ; Williams, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Booker, Victoria ; Halsall, Crispin ; Llewellyn, Neville ; Johnson, Andrew ; Williams, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes. [Display omitted] •We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24369294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - analysis ; Antineoplastic Agents - classification ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Pollutants - analysis ; Environmental Pollutants - classification ; Fate ; Pharmaceuticals ; Risk Assessment ; Surface water ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Waste Water - chemistry ; Waste Water - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Wastewater ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2014-03, Vol.473-474, p.159-170</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Booker, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halsall, Crispin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Neville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes. [Display omitted] •We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - classification</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - classification</subject><subject>Fate</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Waste Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Waste Water - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EglL4BciSTYIn8SNZVoiXVAkWIJaW40wqlyYudoLE3-OohS3Mxhr5zFzNvYRcAs2AgrheZ8HYwQ3Yf2Y5hSIDyIDxAzKDUlYp0FwckhmlrEwrUckTchrCmsaSJRyTk5wVosorNiNvz946bwcbbL9KdD9Yo3uDPmn8uApJ63wSNax3fYf9oDdJ5_oo7Hd0k3gb3hMdAoYwAcl29FsXuzNy1OpNwPP9Oyevd7cvNw_p8un-8WaxTA0rxZCWDCU0bV222BSMV5pKbipW11i0YHSFoGUpW8OBl4byoijiSYy1oqkx_vNiTq52e7fefYwYBtXZYHCz0T26MSgQHBgIAfk_UCZpDlxOqNyhxrsQPLZq622n_ZcCqqYA1Fr9BqCmABSAigHEyYu9yFh32PzO_TgegcUOwOjKp0U_LcJoeWM9mkE1zv4p8g2XPp21</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Booker, Victoria</creator><creator>Halsall, Crispin</creator><creator>Llewellyn, Neville</creator><creator>Johnson, Andrew</creator><creator>Williams, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</title><author>Booker, Victoria ; Halsall, Crispin ; Llewellyn, Neville ; Johnson, Andrew ; Williams, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - classification</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - classification</topic><topic>Fate</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Waste Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Waste Water - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Booker, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halsall, Crispin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Neville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Booker, Victoria</au><au>Halsall, Crispin</au><au>Llewellyn, Neville</au><au>Johnson, Andrew</au><au>Williams, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>473-474</volume><spage>159</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>159-170</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes. [Display omitted] •We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24369294</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2014-03, Vol.473-474, p.159-170
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651416612
source Elsevier
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - analysis
Antineoplastic Agents - classification
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Pollutants - analysis
Environmental Pollutants - classification
Fate
Pharmaceuticals
Risk Assessment
Surface water
Waste Disposal, Fluid
Waste Water - chemistry
Waste Water - statistics & numerical data
Wastewater
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification
title Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritising%20anticancer%20drugs%20for%20environmental%20monitoring%20and%20risk%20assessment%20purposes&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Booker,%20Victoria&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=473-474&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=159-170&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651416612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647021572&rft_id=info:pmid/24369294&rfr_iscdi=true