Loading…
Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes
Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Science of the total environment 2014-03, Vol.473-474, p.159-170 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53 |
container_end_page | 170 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 473-474 |
creator | Booker, Victoria Halsall, Crispin Llewellyn, Neville Johnson, Andrew Williams, Richard |
description | Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes.
[Display omitted]
•We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651416612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969713014496</els_id><sourcerecordid>1651416612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EglL4BciSTYIn8SNZVoiXVAkWIJaW40wqlyYudoLE3-OohS3Mxhr5zFzNvYRcAs2AgrheZ8HYwQ3Yf2Y5hSIDyIDxAzKDUlYp0FwckhmlrEwrUckTchrCmsaSJRyTk5wVosorNiNvz946bwcbbL9KdD9Yo3uDPmn8uApJ63wSNax3fYf9oDdJ5_oo7Hd0k3gb3hMdAoYwAcl29FsXuzNy1OpNwPP9Oyevd7cvNw_p8un-8WaxTA0rxZCWDCU0bV222BSMV5pKbipW11i0YHSFoGUpW8OBl4byoijiSYy1oqkx_vNiTq52e7fefYwYBtXZYHCz0T26MSgQHBgIAfk_UCZpDlxOqNyhxrsQPLZq622n_ZcCqqYA1Fr9BqCmABSAigHEyYu9yFh32PzO_TgegcUOwOjKp0U_LcJoeWM9mkE1zv4p8g2XPp21</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647021572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Booker, Victoria ; Halsall, Crispin ; Llewellyn, Neville ; Johnson, Andrew ; Williams, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Booker, Victoria ; Halsall, Crispin ; Llewellyn, Neville ; Johnson, Andrew ; Williams, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes.
[Display omitted]
•We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24369294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - analysis ; Antineoplastic Agents - classification ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Pollutants - analysis ; Environmental Pollutants - classification ; Fate ; Pharmaceuticals ; Risk Assessment ; Surface water ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Waste Water - chemistry ; Waste Water - statistics & numerical data ; Wastewater ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2014-03, Vol.473-474, p.159-170</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Booker, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halsall, Crispin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Neville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes.
[Display omitted]
•We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - classification</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - classification</subject><subject>Fate</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Waste Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Waste Water - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EglL4BciSTYIn8SNZVoiXVAkWIJaW40wqlyYudoLE3-OohS3Mxhr5zFzNvYRcAs2AgrheZ8HYwQ3Yf2Y5hSIDyIDxAzKDUlYp0FwckhmlrEwrUckTchrCmsaSJRyTk5wVosorNiNvz946bwcbbL9KdD9Yo3uDPmn8uApJ63wSNax3fYf9oDdJ5_oo7Hd0k3gb3hMdAoYwAcl29FsXuzNy1OpNwPP9Oyevd7cvNw_p8un-8WaxTA0rxZCWDCU0bV222BSMV5pKbipW11i0YHSFoGUpW8OBl4byoijiSYy1oqkx_vNiTq52e7fefYwYBtXZYHCz0T26MSgQHBgIAfk_UCZpDlxOqNyhxrsQPLZq622n_ZcCqqYA1Fr9BqCmABSAigHEyYu9yFh32PzO_TgegcUOwOjKp0U_LcJoeWM9mkE1zv4p8g2XPp21</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Booker, Victoria</creator><creator>Halsall, Crispin</creator><creator>Llewellyn, Neville</creator><creator>Johnson, Andrew</creator><creator>Williams, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</title><author>Booker, Victoria ; Halsall, Crispin ; Llewellyn, Neville ; Johnson, Andrew ; Williams, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - classification</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - classification</topic><topic>Fate</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Waste Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Waste Water - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Booker, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halsall, Crispin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Neville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Booker, Victoria</au><au>Halsall, Crispin</au><au>Llewellyn, Neville</au><au>Johnson, Andrew</au><au>Williams, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>473-474</volume><spage>159</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>159-170</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Anticancer drugs routinely used in chemotherapy enter wastewater through the excretion of the non-metabolised drug following administration to patients. This study considers the consumption and subsequent behaviour and occurrence of these chemicals in aquatic systems, with the aim of prioritising a selection of these drugs which are likely to persist in the environment and hence be considered for environmental screening programmes. Accurate consumption data were compiled from a hospital survey in NW England and combined with urinary excretion rates derived from clinical studies. Physical–chemical property data were compiled along with likely chemical fate and persistence during and after wastewater treatment. A shortlist of 15 chemicals (from 65) was prioritised based on their consumption, persistency and likelihood of occurrence in surface waters and supported by observational studies where possible. The ecological impact of these ‘prioritised’ chemicals is uncertain as the measured concentrations in surface waters generally fall below standard toxicity thresholds. Nonetheless, this prioritised sub-list should prove useful for developing environmental screening programmes.
[Display omitted]
•We surveyed regional hospitals to get accurate consumption data for anticancer drugs.•Drugs were systematically ranked based on consumption, behaviour and fate.•A shortlist of 18 drugs is likely to be of environmental concern.•12 anticancer drugs can ‘breakthrough’ to receiving waters.•6 anticancer drugs partition appreciably to sewage sludge and may persist.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24369294</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2014-03, Vol.473-474, p.159-170 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651416612 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Antineoplastic Agents - analysis Antineoplastic Agents - classification Environmental Monitoring Environmental Pollutants - analysis Environmental Pollutants - classification Fate Pharmaceuticals Risk Assessment Surface water Waste Disposal, Fluid Waste Water - chemistry Waste Water - statistics & numerical data Wastewater Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - classification |
title | Prioritising anticancer drugs for environmental monitoring and risk assessment purposes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritising%20anticancer%20drugs%20for%20environmental%20monitoring%20and%20risk%20assessment%20purposes&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Booker,%20Victoria&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=473-474&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=159-170&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651416612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-84e71dfb8fed3459a075c94bbe3f1ca9e1a787fc5158c0533304844f6dbe1ca53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647021572&rft_id=info:pmid/24369294&rfr_iscdi=true |