Loading…

A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation

Phytoplankton bloom phenology has important consequences for marine ecosystems and fisheries. Recent studies have used remotely sensed ocean color data to calculate metrics associated with the phenological cycle, such as the phytoplankton bloom initiation date, on regional and global scales. These m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2013-05, Vol.118 (5), p.2345-2357
Main Authors: Brody, Sarah R., Lozier, M. Susan, Dunne, John P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223
container_end_page 2357
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2345
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Oceans
container_volume 118
creator Brody, Sarah R.
Lozier, M. Susan
Dunne, John P.
description Phytoplankton bloom phenology has important consequences for marine ecosystems and fisheries. Recent studies have used remotely sensed ocean color data to calculate metrics associated with the phenological cycle, such as the phytoplankton bloom initiation date, on regional and global scales. These metrics are often linked to physical or biological forcings. Most studies choose one of several common methods for calculating bloom initiation, leading to questions about whether bloom initiation dates calculated with different methods yield comparable results. Here we compare three methods for finding the date of phytoplankton bloom initiation in the North Atlantic: a biomass‐based threshold method, a rate of change method, and a cumulative biomass‐based threshold method. We use these methods to examine whether the onset of positive ocean‐atmosphere heat fluxes coincides with subpolar bloom initiation. In several coherent locations, we find differences in the patterns of bloom initiation created by each method and differences in the synchrony between bloom initiation and positive heat fluxes, which likely indicate various physical processes at play in the study region. We also assess the effect of missing data on the chosen methods. Key PointsDifferent methods of calculating bloom start dates produced different results.Each method identified the bloom as a different part of the chlorophyll cycle.The onset of positive heat fluxes coincides with the phytoplankton bloom.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jgrc.20167
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651419111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1651419111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhosouKgXf0HBiwhdM0naJEdZdVUWFVH3GNI2q1nbpiZZdP-9WVc9eBDnMgPzvPPxJsk-oCEghI_nT64aYgQF20gGGAqRCSxg86dm-Xay5_0cxeDAKRWDZHSSVrbtlTPedqmdpa0Oz7b2abBprYN2rel02j8vg-0b1b2ESJWNtW1qOhOMCsZ2u8nWTDVe733lneTh_Ox-dJFNbsaXo5NJpnKCWEZVKVjOSVWVRcVLpBUWRHDG2KyiiGsqaqhxjYEoprEoaDyTKE5KVrIcYUx2ksP13N7Z14X2QbbGV7qJd2m78BKKHCgIAPgHSuLInKIioge_0LlduC4-sqI4Ac4_dx-tqcpZ752eyd6ZVrmlBCRX7suV-_LT_QjDGn4zjV7-Qcqr8d3oW5OtNcYH_f6jUe5Fxi7L5fR6LGnOJtPb01v5SD4A53eT-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638318822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brody, Sarah R. ; Lozier, M. Susan ; Dunne, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brody, Sarah R. ; Lozier, M. Susan ; Dunne, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Phytoplankton bloom phenology has important consequences for marine ecosystems and fisheries. Recent studies have used remotely sensed ocean color data to calculate metrics associated with the phenological cycle, such as the phytoplankton bloom initiation date, on regional and global scales. These metrics are often linked to physical or biological forcings. Most studies choose one of several common methods for calculating bloom initiation, leading to questions about whether bloom initiation dates calculated with different methods yield comparable results. Here we compare three methods for finding the date of phytoplankton bloom initiation in the North Atlantic: a biomass‐based threshold method, a rate of change method, and a cumulative biomass‐based threshold method. We use these methods to examine whether the onset of positive ocean‐atmosphere heat fluxes coincides with subpolar bloom initiation. In several coherent locations, we find differences in the patterns of bloom initiation created by each method and differences in the synchrony between bloom initiation and positive heat fluxes, which likely indicate various physical processes at play in the study region. We also assess the effect of missing data on the chosen methods. Key PointsDifferent methods of calculating bloom start dates produced different results.Each method identified the bloom as a different part of the chlorophyll cycle.The onset of positive heat fluxes coincides with the phytoplankton bloom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chlorophylls ; Fluxes ; Geophysics ; heat fluxes ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine fish ; Mathematical analysis ; Methods ; Ocean color ; ocean color remote sensing ; Phytoplankton ; phytoplankton bloom initiation ; phytoplankton phenology ; Plankton ; Production methods ; SeaWiFS ; subpolar spring bloom ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2013-05, Vol.118 (5), p.2345-2357</ispartof><rights>2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brody, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozier, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Oceans</addtitle><description>Phytoplankton bloom phenology has important consequences for marine ecosystems and fisheries. Recent studies have used remotely sensed ocean color data to calculate metrics associated with the phenological cycle, such as the phytoplankton bloom initiation date, on regional and global scales. These metrics are often linked to physical or biological forcings. Most studies choose one of several common methods for calculating bloom initiation, leading to questions about whether bloom initiation dates calculated with different methods yield comparable results. Here we compare three methods for finding the date of phytoplankton bloom initiation in the North Atlantic: a biomass‐based threshold method, a rate of change method, and a cumulative biomass‐based threshold method. We use these methods to examine whether the onset of positive ocean‐atmosphere heat fluxes coincides with subpolar bloom initiation. In several coherent locations, we find differences in the patterns of bloom initiation created by each method and differences in the synchrony between bloom initiation and positive heat fluxes, which likely indicate various physical processes at play in the study region. We also assess the effect of missing data on the chosen methods. Key PointsDifferent methods of calculating bloom start dates produced different results.Each method identified the bloom as a different part of the chlorophyll cycle.The onset of positive heat fluxes coincides with the phytoplankton bloom.</description><subject>Chlorophylls</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>heat fluxes</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine fish</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Ocean color</subject><subject>ocean color remote sensing</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>phytoplankton bloom initiation</subject><subject>phytoplankton phenology</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>SeaWiFS</subject><subject>subpolar spring bloom</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhosouKgXf0HBiwhdM0naJEdZdVUWFVH3GNI2q1nbpiZZdP-9WVc9eBDnMgPzvPPxJsk-oCEghI_nT64aYgQF20gGGAqRCSxg86dm-Xay5_0cxeDAKRWDZHSSVrbtlTPedqmdpa0Oz7b2abBprYN2rel02j8vg-0b1b2ESJWNtW1qOhOMCsZ2u8nWTDVe733lneTh_Ox-dJFNbsaXo5NJpnKCWEZVKVjOSVWVRcVLpBUWRHDG2KyiiGsqaqhxjYEoprEoaDyTKE5KVrIcYUx2ksP13N7Z14X2QbbGV7qJd2m78BKKHCgIAPgHSuLInKIioge_0LlduC4-sqI4Ac4_dx-tqcpZ752eyd6ZVrmlBCRX7suV-_LT_QjDGn4zjV7-Qcqr8d3oW5OtNcYH_f6jUe5Fxi7L5fR6LGnOJtPb01v5SD4A53eT-g</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Brody, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Lozier, M. Susan</creator><creator>Dunne, John P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation</title><author>Brody, Sarah R. ; Lozier, M. Susan ; Dunne, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Chlorophylls</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>heat fluxes</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine fish</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Ocean color</topic><topic>ocean color remote sensing</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>phytoplankton bloom initiation</topic><topic>phytoplankton phenology</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>SeaWiFS</topic><topic>subpolar spring bloom</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brody, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozier, M. Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brody, Sarah R.</au><au>Lozier, M. Susan</au><au>Dunne, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Oceans</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2345</spage><epage>2357</epage><pages>2345-2357</pages><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>Phytoplankton bloom phenology has important consequences for marine ecosystems and fisheries. Recent studies have used remotely sensed ocean color data to calculate metrics associated with the phenological cycle, such as the phytoplankton bloom initiation date, on regional and global scales. These metrics are often linked to physical or biological forcings. Most studies choose one of several common methods for calculating bloom initiation, leading to questions about whether bloom initiation dates calculated with different methods yield comparable results. Here we compare three methods for finding the date of phytoplankton bloom initiation in the North Atlantic: a biomass‐based threshold method, a rate of change method, and a cumulative biomass‐based threshold method. We use these methods to examine whether the onset of positive ocean‐atmosphere heat fluxes coincides with subpolar bloom initiation. In several coherent locations, we find differences in the patterns of bloom initiation created by each method and differences in the synchrony between bloom initiation and positive heat fluxes, which likely indicate various physical processes at play in the study region. We also assess the effect of missing data on the chosen methods. Key PointsDifferent methods of calculating bloom start dates produced different results.Each method identified the bloom as a different part of the chlorophyll cycle.The onset of positive heat fluxes coincides with the phytoplankton bloom.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jgrc.20167</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9275
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2013-05, Vol.118 (5), p.2345-2357
issn 2169-9275
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1651419111
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Chlorophylls
Fluxes
Geophysics
heat fluxes
Marine ecosystems
Marine fish
Mathematical analysis
Methods
Ocean color
ocean color remote sensing
Phytoplankton
phytoplankton bloom initiation
phytoplankton phenology
Plankton
Production methods
SeaWiFS
subpolar spring bloom
Thresholds
title A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20methods%20to%20determine%20phytoplankton%20bloom%20initiation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Brody,%20Sarah%20R.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2345&rft.epage=2357&rft.pages=2345-2357&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgrc.20167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651419111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5307-4ab97583ccb6c8b0ea29398777fc408e49d1d2d213a7e29640003a83b7b750223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638318822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true