Loading…

Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum

Prorocentrum minimum (formerly also known as P. mariae-lebouriae) is a common bloom-forming, photosynthetic dinoflagellate in Chesapeake Bay, USA. It is also capable of ingesting other cells. In Chesapeake Bay, P. minimum usually co-occurs with cryptophytes. Ingested cryptophyte material is observab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 1997-01, Vol.152 (1/3), p.1-12
Main Authors: Stoecker, Diane K., Li, Aishao, Coats, D. Wayne, Gustafson, Daniel E., Nannen, Michelle K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-19d9167bd3838b29ec7840a2c09b3af27093beb395559cb15866b0c644825dc63
cites
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1/3
container_start_page 1
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 152
creator Stoecker, Diane K.
Li, Aishao
Coats, D. Wayne
Gustafson, Daniel E.
Nannen, Michelle K.
description Prorocentrum minimum (formerly also known as P. mariae-lebouriae) is a common bloom-forming, photosynthetic dinoflagellate in Chesapeake Bay, USA. It is also capable of ingesting other cells. In Chesapeake Bay, P. minimum usually co-occurs with cryptophytes. Ingested cryptophyte material is observable in the dinoflagellate under an epifluorescent microscope as orange-fluorescent inclusions (OFI). During April and May, the frequency of OFI was ≤10% in both surface and pycnocline assemblages. In summer, up to 50% of the P. minimum contained OFI. The frequency of OFI was positively correlated with cryptophyte abundance, but OFI were not frequent in all populations of P. minimum when cryptophyte densities were high. On-deck experimental incubations were done to determine the conditions that influence feeding. Light level and inorganic nutrient availability over the previous 24 h affect feeding. Incidence of feeding is lower when populations are maintained in the dark for 24 h than on a natural light:dark cycle. Addition of nitrate and phosphate together can inhibit feeding. Ingestion has a diel pattern, with frequency of OFI highest in the afternoon and evening and lowest in the morning. Feeding is influenced by a complex of factors, but the spatial-temporal pattern of ingestion and the experiments both suggest that feeding is primarily a mechanism for obtaining limiting inorganic nutrients rather than a mechanism for supplementing carbon nutrition during light limitation. Ingestion of other protists, including competitors for light and nutrients, may be an important strategy which allows bloom-forming dinoflagellates to dominate plankton assemblages for extended periods and during changing nutrient regimes.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps152001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16514562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24857804</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24857804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-19d9167bd3838b29ec7840a2c09b3af27093beb395559cb15866b0c644825dc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0L9LxDAcBfAgCp6ni7vQyUGo5pvfGeXwF5zooHNp09TL0TQ1ScH7773jRFent3x4PB5C54CvKeXsxtsxAScYwwGagQBRAtf6EM0wSCiVoPgYnaS03gLBpJgh_uy-Qo5hXG0KNxR5ZYvWDaHr6w_b93W2xWsMMRg75Dj5wrvB-cmfoqOu7pM9-8k5er-_e1s8lsuXh6fF7bI0lMlcgm41CNm0VFHVEG2NVAzXxGDd0LojEmva2IZqzrk2DXAlRIONYEwR3hpB5-hy3zvG8DnZlCvvktkNG2yYUgWCA-OC_ANSIjWnW3i1hyaGlKLtqjE6X8dNBbjaXVj9XbjFF3u8TjnEX0mY4lJhRr8B6tttHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16327953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Stoecker, Diane K. ; Li, Aishao ; Coats, D. Wayne ; Gustafson, Daniel E. ; Nannen, Michelle K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoecker, Diane K. ; Li, Aishao ; Coats, D. Wayne ; Gustafson, Daniel E. ; Nannen, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><description>Prorocentrum minimum (formerly also known as P. mariae-lebouriae) is a common bloom-forming, photosynthetic dinoflagellate in Chesapeake Bay, USA. It is also capable of ingesting other cells. In Chesapeake Bay, P. minimum usually co-occurs with cryptophytes. Ingested cryptophyte material is observable in the dinoflagellate under an epifluorescent microscope as orange-fluorescent inclusions (OFI). During April and May, the frequency of OFI was ≤10% in both surface and pycnocline assemblages. In summer, up to 50% of the P. minimum contained OFI. The frequency of OFI was positively correlated with cryptophyte abundance, but OFI were not frequent in all populations of P. minimum when cryptophyte densities were high. On-deck experimental incubations were done to determine the conditions that influence feeding. Light level and inorganic nutrient availability over the previous 24 h affect feeding. Incidence of feeding is lower when populations are maintained in the dark for 24 h than on a natural light:dark cycle. Addition of nitrate and phosphate together can inhibit feeding. Ingestion has a diel pattern, with frequency of OFI highest in the afternoon and evening and lowest in the morning. Feeding is influenced by a complex of factors, but the spatial-temporal pattern of ingestion and the experiments both suggest that feeding is primarily a mechanism for obtaining limiting inorganic nutrients rather than a mechanism for supplementing carbon nutrition during light limitation. Ingestion of other protists, including competitors for light and nutrients, may be an important strategy which allows bloom-forming dinoflagellates to dominate plankton assemblages for extended periods and during changing nutrient regimes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps152001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Carboys ; Cruises ; Cryptophyceae ; Ingestion ; Marine ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Nutrients ; Phosphates ; Phosphorus ; Phytoplankton ; Prorocentrum minimum ; Surface water</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 1997-01, Vol.152 (1/3), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Inter-Research 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-19d9167bd3838b29ec7840a2c09b3af27093beb395559cb15866b0c644825dc63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24857804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24857804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoecker, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Aishao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coats, D. Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nannen, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><title>Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Prorocentrum minimum (formerly also known as P. mariae-lebouriae) is a common bloom-forming, photosynthetic dinoflagellate in Chesapeake Bay, USA. It is also capable of ingesting other cells. In Chesapeake Bay, P. minimum usually co-occurs with cryptophytes. Ingested cryptophyte material is observable in the dinoflagellate under an epifluorescent microscope as orange-fluorescent inclusions (OFI). During April and May, the frequency of OFI was ≤10% in both surface and pycnocline assemblages. In summer, up to 50% of the P. minimum contained OFI. The frequency of OFI was positively correlated with cryptophyte abundance, but OFI were not frequent in all populations of P. minimum when cryptophyte densities were high. On-deck experimental incubations were done to determine the conditions that influence feeding. Light level and inorganic nutrient availability over the previous 24 h affect feeding. Incidence of feeding is lower when populations are maintained in the dark for 24 h than on a natural light:dark cycle. Addition of nitrate and phosphate together can inhibit feeding. Ingestion has a diel pattern, with frequency of OFI highest in the afternoon and evening and lowest in the morning. Feeding is influenced by a complex of factors, but the spatial-temporal pattern of ingestion and the experiments both suggest that feeding is primarily a mechanism for obtaining limiting inorganic nutrients rather than a mechanism for supplementing carbon nutrition during light limitation. Ingestion of other protists, including competitors for light and nutrients, may be an important strategy which allows bloom-forming dinoflagellates to dominate plankton assemblages for extended periods and during changing nutrient regimes.</description><subject>Carboys</subject><subject>Cruises</subject><subject>Cryptophyceae</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Prorocentrum minimum</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0L9LxDAcBfAgCp6ni7vQyUGo5pvfGeXwF5zooHNp09TL0TQ1ScH7773jRFent3x4PB5C54CvKeXsxtsxAScYwwGagQBRAtf6EM0wSCiVoPgYnaS03gLBpJgh_uy-Qo5hXG0KNxR5ZYvWDaHr6w_b93W2xWsMMRg75Dj5wrvB-cmfoqOu7pM9-8k5er-_e1s8lsuXh6fF7bI0lMlcgm41CNm0VFHVEG2NVAzXxGDd0LojEmva2IZqzrk2DXAlRIONYEwR3hpB5-hy3zvG8DnZlCvvktkNG2yYUgWCA-OC_ANSIjWnW3i1hyaGlKLtqjE6X8dNBbjaXVj9XbjFF3u8TjnEX0mY4lJhRr8B6tttHQ</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Stoecker, Diane K.</creator><creator>Li, Aishao</creator><creator>Coats, D. Wayne</creator><creator>Gustafson, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Nannen, Michelle K.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum</title><author>Stoecker, Diane K. ; Li, Aishao ; Coats, D. Wayne ; Gustafson, Daniel E. ; Nannen, Michelle K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-19d9167bd3838b29ec7840a2c09b3af27093beb395559cb15866b0c644825dc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Carboys</topic><topic>Cruises</topic><topic>Cryptophyceae</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Prorocentrum minimum</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoecker, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Aishao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coats, D. Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nannen, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoecker, Diane K.</au><au>Li, Aishao</au><au>Coats, D. Wayne</au><au>Gustafson, Daniel E.</au><au>Nannen, Michelle K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>1/3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Prorocentrum minimum (formerly also known as P. mariae-lebouriae) is a common bloom-forming, photosynthetic dinoflagellate in Chesapeake Bay, USA. It is also capable of ingesting other cells. In Chesapeake Bay, P. minimum usually co-occurs with cryptophytes. Ingested cryptophyte material is observable in the dinoflagellate under an epifluorescent microscope as orange-fluorescent inclusions (OFI). During April and May, the frequency of OFI was ≤10% in both surface and pycnocline assemblages. In summer, up to 50% of the P. minimum contained OFI. The frequency of OFI was positively correlated with cryptophyte abundance, but OFI were not frequent in all populations of P. minimum when cryptophyte densities were high. On-deck experimental incubations were done to determine the conditions that influence feeding. Light level and inorganic nutrient availability over the previous 24 h affect feeding. Incidence of feeding is lower when populations are maintained in the dark for 24 h than on a natural light:dark cycle. Addition of nitrate and phosphate together can inhibit feeding. Ingestion has a diel pattern, with frequency of OFI highest in the afternoon and evening and lowest in the morning. Feeding is influenced by a complex of factors, but the spatial-temporal pattern of ingestion and the experiments both suggest that feeding is primarily a mechanism for obtaining limiting inorganic nutrients rather than a mechanism for supplementing carbon nutrition during light limitation. Ingestion of other protists, including competitors for light and nutrients, may be an important strategy which allows bloom-forming dinoflagellates to dominate plankton assemblages for extended periods and during changing nutrient regimes.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps152001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 1997-01, Vol.152 (1/3), p.1-12
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16514562
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Carboys
Cruises
Cryptophyceae
Ingestion
Marine
Nitrates
Nitrogen
Nutrients
Phosphates
Phosphorus
Phytoplankton
Prorocentrum minimum
Surface water
title Mixotrophy in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mixotrophy%20in%20the%20dinoflagellate%20Prorocentrum%20minimum&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Stoecker,%20Diane%20K.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=1/3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps152001&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24857804%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-19d9167bd3838b29ec7840a2c09b3af27093beb395559cb15866b0c644825dc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16327953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24857804&rfr_iscdi=true