Loading…

Water motion on coral reefs: evaluation of the 'clod card' technique

Assumptions underlying the technique of using dissolution rates of plaster blocks as a dimensionless index of water motion were tested. 'Diffusion factor' (DF) was originally defined by Doty (1971) as the ratio of weight of material dissolved from an experimental block to that of a control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 1993, Vol.93 (1/2), p.175-181
Main Authors: Jokiel, Paul L., Morrissey, Janice I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Assumptions underlying the technique of using dissolution rates of plaster blocks as a dimensionless index of water motion were tested. 'Diffusion factor' (DF) was originally defined by Doty (1971) as the ratio of weight of material dissolved from an experimental block to that of a control block maintained simultaneously in calm water. The DF concept must be interpreted with caution because measurement of the rate of loss in the control block is influenced by many factors. The volume of standing water containing the control block must be relatively large in order to avoid saturation of the water with solute from the card. Temperature and salinity also influence rate of weight loss. Relationship between current velocity and weight loss was linear over the range of current velocities tested (0 to 47 cm s−1). Weight loss remained relatively constant until the block dissolved to less than 30 % of its original weight. The DF measurement is analogous to various dimensionless indices of mass transfer currently being applied in coral reef hydrodynamics. Weight loss due to turbulence (i.e. wave-induced orbital motion) and weight loss due to unidirectional flow (i.e. current) apparently are additive, but in a complex fashion. Exemplary data are presented to illustrate the utility as well as the limitations of this method on coral reefs.
ISSN:0171-8630
1616-1599
DOI:10.3354/meps093175