Loading…

Evaluation of the SF-12: usefulness of the mental health scale

The SF-12 is one of the most used questionnaires to evaluate the multidimensional health related quality of life, worldwide. However, the factor structure does not match the structure of the original instrument. Besides, most studies centered in the physical dimension paying less attention to mental...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista medíca de Chile 2014-10, Vol.142 (10), p.1275-1283
Main Authors: Vera-Villarroel, Pablo, Silva, Jaime, Celis-Atenas, Karem, Pavez, Paula
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e77447b4b2d44b47e4049bc746b7e29e8fb10a14349301243a266ecd433652eb3
cites
container_end_page 1283
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1275
container_title Revista medíca de Chile
container_volume 142
creator Vera-Villarroel, Pablo
Silva, Jaime
Celis-Atenas, Karem
Pavez, Paula
description The SF-12 is one of the most used questionnaires to evaluate the multidimensional health related quality of life, worldwide. However, the factor structure does not match the structure of the original instrument. Besides, most studies centered in the physical dimension paying less attention to mental health related quality of life. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SF-12 and to validate the mental health dimension of this questionnaire. Two studies were conducted, the first consisting of 840 people aged between 18 and 60 years, who answered the SF-12. In the second study, 970 people aged between 18 and 60 years answered the SF-12 questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability) was analyzed, along with construct and criterion validity for the mental health dimension. The reliability estimate using Cronbach's alpha in both studies was higher than 0.74 in both dimensions (physical and psychological). Construct validity analysis yielded a three factor complex solution. Finally the criterion validity analysis showed appropriate and significant correlations with depression and anxiety. The SF-12 and its mental health scale are suitable for epidemiological characterization studies.
doi_str_mv 10.4067/S0034-98872014001000007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652410139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652410139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e77447b4b2d44b47e4049bc746b7e29e8fb10a14349301243a266ecd433652eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8FKw0AURQdBbK3-gmbpJvrezMtM4kKQ0qpQcFFdh5nkhUQmSc0kgn_fiu3dnMU9XLhC3CLcE2jzsAVQFGdpaiQgASD8xZyJORg0sUatZuIyhC8AaTSmF2ImEw2IKOfiafVj_WTHpu-ivorGmqPtOkb5GE2Bq8l3HMKpaLkbrY9qtn6so1BYz1fivLI-8PWRC_G5Xn0sX-PN-8vb8nkTF5glY8zGEBlHTpZEjgwTUOYKQ9oZlhmnlUOwSIoyBShJWak1FyUppRPJTi3E3f_ubui_Jw5j3jahYO9tx_0UcjxohIAqO6g3R3VyLZf5bmhaO_zmp89qD1ZSVVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652410139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the SF-12: usefulness of the mental health scale</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo ; Silva, Jaime ; Celis-Atenas, Karem ; Pavez, Paula</creator><creatorcontrib>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo ; Silva, Jaime ; Celis-Atenas, Karem ; Pavez, Paula</creatorcontrib><description>The SF-12 is one of the most used questionnaires to evaluate the multidimensional health related quality of life, worldwide. However, the factor structure does not match the structure of the original instrument. Besides, most studies centered in the physical dimension paying less attention to mental health related quality of life. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SF-12 and to validate the mental health dimension of this questionnaire. Two studies were conducted, the first consisting of 840 people aged between 18 and 60 years, who answered the SF-12. In the second study, 970 people aged between 18 and 60 years answered the SF-12 questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability) was analyzed, along with construct and criterion validity for the mental health dimension. The reliability estimate using Cronbach's alpha in both studies was higher than 0.74 in both dimensions (physical and psychological). Construct validity analysis yielded a three factor complex solution. Finally the criterion validity analysis showed appropriate and significant correlations with depression and anxiety. The SF-12 and its mental health scale are suitable for epidemiological characterization studies.</description><identifier>EISSN: 0717-6163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4067/S0034-98872014001000007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25601112</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Chile</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety Disorders - psychology ; Depressive Disorder - psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Health ; Middle Aged ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista medíca de Chile, 2014-10, Vol.142 (10), p.1275-1283</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e77447b4b2d44b47e4049bc746b7e29e8fb10a14349301243a266ecd433652eb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25601112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celis-Atenas, Karem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavez, Paula</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the SF-12: usefulness of the mental health scale</title><title>Revista medíca de Chile</title><addtitle>Rev Med Chil</addtitle><description>The SF-12 is one of the most used questionnaires to evaluate the multidimensional health related quality of life, worldwide. However, the factor structure does not match the structure of the original instrument. Besides, most studies centered in the physical dimension paying less attention to mental health related quality of life. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SF-12 and to validate the mental health dimension of this questionnaire. Two studies were conducted, the first consisting of 840 people aged between 18 and 60 years, who answered the SF-12. In the second study, 970 people aged between 18 and 60 years answered the SF-12 questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability) was analyzed, along with construct and criterion validity for the mental health dimension. The reliability estimate using Cronbach's alpha in both studies was higher than 0.74 in both dimensions (physical and psychological). Construct validity analysis yielded a three factor complex solution. Finally the criterion validity analysis showed appropriate and significant correlations with depression and anxiety. The SF-12 and its mental health scale are suitable for epidemiological characterization studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0717-6163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j8FKw0AURQdBbK3-gmbpJvrezMtM4kKQ0qpQcFFdh5nkhUQmSc0kgn_fiu3dnMU9XLhC3CLcE2jzsAVQFGdpaiQgASD8xZyJORg0sUatZuIyhC8AaTSmF2ImEw2IKOfiafVj_WTHpu-ivorGmqPtOkb5GE2Bq8l3HMKpaLkbrY9qtn6so1BYz1fivLI-8PWRC_G5Xn0sX-PN-8vb8nkTF5glY8zGEBlHTpZEjgwTUOYKQ9oZlhmnlUOwSIoyBShJWak1FyUppRPJTi3E3f_ubui_Jw5j3jahYO9tx_0UcjxohIAqO6g3R3VyLZf5bmhaO_zmp89qD1ZSVVE</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo</creator><creator>Silva, Jaime</creator><creator>Celis-Atenas, Karem</creator><creator>Pavez, Paula</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the SF-12: usefulness of the mental health scale</title><author>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo ; Silva, Jaime ; Celis-Atenas, Karem ; Pavez, Paula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e77447b4b2d44b47e4049bc746b7e29e8fb10a14349301243a266ecd433652eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celis-Atenas, Karem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavez, Paula</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista medíca de Chile</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vera-Villarroel, Pablo</au><au>Silva, Jaime</au><au>Celis-Atenas, Karem</au><au>Pavez, Paula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the SF-12: usefulness of the mental health scale</atitle><jtitle>Revista medíca de Chile</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Med Chil</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1275</spage><epage>1283</epage><pages>1275-1283</pages><eissn>0717-6163</eissn><abstract>The SF-12 is one of the most used questionnaires to evaluate the multidimensional health related quality of life, worldwide. However, the factor structure does not match the structure of the original instrument. Besides, most studies centered in the physical dimension paying less attention to mental health related quality of life. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SF-12 and to validate the mental health dimension of this questionnaire. Two studies were conducted, the first consisting of 840 people aged between 18 and 60 years, who answered the SF-12. In the second study, 970 people aged between 18 and 60 years answered the SF-12 questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability) was analyzed, along with construct and criterion validity for the mental health dimension. The reliability estimate using Cronbach's alpha in both studies was higher than 0.74 in both dimensions (physical and psychological). Construct validity analysis yielded a three factor complex solution. Finally the criterion validity analysis showed appropriate and significant correlations with depression and anxiety. The SF-12 and its mental health scale are suitable for epidemiological characterization studies.</abstract><cop>Chile</cop><pmid>25601112</pmid><doi>10.4067/S0034-98872014001000007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 0717-6163
ispartof Revista medíca de Chile, 2014-10, Vol.142 (10), p.1275-1283
issn 0717-6163
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652410139
source SciELO
subjects Adult
Anxiety Disorders - psychology
Depressive Disorder - psychology
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Psychometrics
Quality of Life - psychology
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Evaluation of the SF-12: usefulness of the mental health scale
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A03%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20SF-12:%20usefulness%20of%20the%20mental%20health%20scale&rft.jtitle=Revista%20med%C3%ADca%20de%20Chile&rft.au=Vera-Villarroel,%20Pablo&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1275&rft.epage=1283&rft.pages=1275-1283&rft.eissn=0717-6163&rft_id=info:doi/10.4067/S0034-98872014001000007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1652410139%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e77447b4b2d44b47e4049bc746b7e29e8fb10a14349301243a266ecd433652eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652410139&rft_id=info:pmid/25601112&rfr_iscdi=true