Loading…
Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future
The clinic-specific public reporting of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been mandated by Federal law since 1992. As of late, a series of scientific and medical advances have all but deconstructed ART practice patterns thereby demanding that current reporting platforms be reevalua...
Saved in:
| Published in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2015-02, Vol.212 (2), p.157-162 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13 |
| container_end_page | 162 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 157 |
| container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
| container_volume | 212 |
| creator | Williams, R. Stan, MD Doody, Kevin J., MD Schattman, Glenn L., MD Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS |
| description | The clinic-specific public reporting of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been mandated by Federal law since 1992. As of late, a series of scientific and medical advances have all but deconstructed ART practice patterns thereby demanding that current reporting platforms be reevaluated for their continued ability to afford the public with credible and understandable estimates of conception per initiated cycle. In this Clinical Opinion , we trace the history of the public reporting of ART, describe the recently modified (present day) reporting platform, and explore potential future improvements thereof. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.010 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652444543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937814004475</els_id><sourcerecordid>1652444543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQLl3YepImbSMiyOAXDCio4C6kyek1tbe5k4-B--9NuaMLF67ywfu-55znEPKUQkOBdi_nRs9-3zCgvAHRAIV7ZEdB9nU3dMN9sgMAVsu2Hy7Ioxjn7ckke0guGB9oK6TckR9f8rg4UwU8-pDcuq_8VOkYXUxot9_gbTbJ3WKV0Pxc_eL3p8rnZPwB46vqqGN6UR0DRlzLRa-2mnLKAR-TB5NeIj65Oy_J9_fvvl19rK8_f_h09fa6NqWHVFvZ6ZZbLsEMUlOUGjppzMRwAip4y5COo-DC8q7MN_XtaIulBW6wBzHR9pI8P-eWTm8yxqQOLhpcFr2iz1HRTjDOeYkqUnaWmuBjDDipY3AHHU6KgtqIqlltRNVGVIFQpWIxPbvLz-MB7V_LH4RF8PoswDLlrcOgonG4GrQuoEnKevf__Df_2M3iVmf08gtPGGefw1r4KaoiU6C-bkvcVko5AOe9aH8DdL2cnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652444543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Williams, R. Stan, MD ; Doody, Kevin J., MD ; Schattman, Glenn L., MD ; Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, R. Stan, MD ; Doody, Kevin J., MD ; Schattman, Glenn L., MD ; Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>The clinic-specific public reporting of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been mandated by Federal law since 1992. As of late, a series of scientific and medical advances have all but deconstructed ART practice patterns thereby demanding that current reporting platforms be reevaluated for their continued ability to afford the public with credible and understandable estimates of conception per initiated cycle. In this Clinical Opinion , we trace the history of the public reporting of ART, describe the recently modified (present day) reporting platform, and explore potential future improvements thereof.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24813599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>assisted reproductive technology ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) ; Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Humans ; Insemination, Artificial ; in vitro fertilization ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovulation Induction ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; public reporting ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends ; Societies, Medical ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015-02, Vol.212 (2), p.157-162</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24813599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, R. Stan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doody, Kevin J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schattman, Glenn L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The clinic-specific public reporting of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been mandated by Federal law since 1992. As of late, a series of scientific and medical advances have all but deconstructed ART practice patterns thereby demanding that current reporting platforms be reevaluated for their continued ability to afford the public with credible and understandable estimates of conception per initiated cycle. In this Clinical Opinion , we trace the history of the public reporting of ART, describe the recently modified (present day) reporting platform, and explore potential future improvements thereof.</description><subject>assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)</subject><subject>Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial</subject><subject>in vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>public reporting</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQLl3YepImbSMiyOAXDCio4C6kyek1tbe5k4-B--9NuaMLF67ywfu-55znEPKUQkOBdi_nRs9-3zCgvAHRAIV7ZEdB9nU3dMN9sgMAVsu2Hy7Ioxjn7ckke0guGB9oK6TckR9f8rg4UwU8-pDcuq_8VOkYXUxot9_gbTbJ3WKV0Pxc_eL3p8rnZPwB46vqqGN6UR0DRlzLRa-2mnLKAR-TB5NeIj65Oy_J9_fvvl19rK8_f_h09fa6NqWHVFvZ6ZZbLsEMUlOUGjppzMRwAip4y5COo-DC8q7MN_XtaIulBW6wBzHR9pI8P-eWTm8yxqQOLhpcFr2iz1HRTjDOeYkqUnaWmuBjDDipY3AHHU6KgtqIqlltRNVGVIFQpWIxPbvLz-MB7V_LH4RF8PoswDLlrcOgonG4GrQuoEnKevf__Df_2M3iVmf08gtPGGefw1r4KaoiU6C-bkvcVko5AOe9aH8DdL2cnA</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Williams, R. Stan, MD</creator><creator>Doody, Kevin J., MD</creator><creator>Schattman, Glenn L., MD</creator><creator>Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future</title><author>Williams, R. Stan, MD ; Doody, Kevin J., MD ; Schattman, Glenn L., MD ; Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)</topic><topic>Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial</topic><topic>in vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>public reporting</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, R. Stan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doody, Kevin J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schattman, Glenn L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, R. Stan, MD</au><au>Doody, Kevin J., MD</au><au>Schattman, Glenn L., MD</au><au>Adashi, Eli Y., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>212</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>157-162</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>The clinic-specific public reporting of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes has been mandated by Federal law since 1992. As of late, a series of scientific and medical advances have all but deconstructed ART practice patterns thereby demanding that current reporting platforms be reevaluated for their continued ability to afford the public with credible and understandable estimates of conception per initiated cycle. In this Clinical Opinion , we trace the history of the public reporting of ART, describe the recently modified (present day) reporting platform, and explore potential future improvements thereof.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24813599</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
| ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015-02, Vol.212 (2), p.157-162 |
| issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1652444543 |
| source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
| subjects | assisted reproductive technology Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence Embryo Transfer Female Fertilization in Vitro Humans Insemination, Artificial in vitro fertilization Obstetrics and Gynecology Ovulation Induction Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate public reporting Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends Societies, Medical Time Factors Treatment Outcome United States |
| title | Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A28%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20reporting%20of%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20outcomes:%20past,%20present,%20and%20future&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Williams,%20R.%20Stan,%20MD&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=212&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=157-162&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1652444543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d96a34d490c89a1e9a069ccf2ef015432e1bb545d46010f73bdd96304ce705f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652444543&rft_id=info:pmid/24813599&rfr_iscdi=true |