Loading…
Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?
Summary As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Zoonoses and public health 2015-03, Vol.62 (2), p.125-130 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363 |
container_end_page | 130 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Zoonoses and public health |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Kolstoe, E. M. Iversen, T. Østensvik, Ø. Abdelghani, A. Secic, I. Nesbakken, T. |
description | Summary
As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/zph.12132 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1653128870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1653128870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMofkwv_ANS8EYv6pKcJmlvFBnOKVMHKhNvQpqmWm3Xmmzo_PVmH-5C8NzkEJ734fAitE_wCfHT_m5eTwglQNfQNok5hBREvL7cScKSLbTj3BvGjCVYbKItGokkZlhso9P7xugiL3QwUOPX-sWMwq41JhgUL0HP2MwFqnR1MP_LbV0FHVU107JOlR4be7aLNnIPmL3l20KP3YuHTi_s311edc77oY4op2FOQQMHSAAUIxEjCU-1wgwoZDgnOs14JkyeJZwCiTJNYxyB5pGIo9THOLTQ0cLb2PpjYtxYVoXTpizVyNQTJwlnQGgcC-zRwz_oWz2xI3_djKKEEeaVLXS8oLStnbMml40tKmWnkmA5K1X6UuW8VM8eLI2TtDLZivxt0QPtBfBZlGb6v0k-D3q_ynCRKNzYfK0Syr5LLkAwOby9lM_XN09DzEES-AGMzIxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652151563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kolstoe, E. M. ; Iversen, T. ; Østensvik, Ø. ; Abdelghani, A. ; Secic, I. ; Nesbakken, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolstoe, E. M. ; Iversen, T. ; Østensvik, Ø. ; Abdelghani, A. ; Secic, I. ; Nesbakken, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.12132</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24798507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animals ; Autumn ; biosecurity ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - isolation & purification ; Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Campylobacter Infections - microbiology ; Campylobacter Infections - veterinary ; Hogs ; Humans ; Norway - epidemiology ; Pathogens ; pig herds ; Seasons ; Specific Pathogen Free ; Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - epidemiology ; Swine Diseases - microbiology ; Swine production ; Time Factors ; Zoonoses ; Zoonoses - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2015-03, Vol.62 (2), p.125-130</ispartof><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24798507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolstoe, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Østensvik, Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelghani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secic, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nesbakken, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Summary
As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>biosecurity</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>pig herds</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Specific Pathogen Free</subject><subject>Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Swine production</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><subject>Zoonoses - prevention & control</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMofkwv_ANS8EYv6pKcJmlvFBnOKVMHKhNvQpqmWm3Xmmzo_PVmH-5C8NzkEJ734fAitE_wCfHT_m5eTwglQNfQNok5hBREvL7cScKSLbTj3BvGjCVYbKItGokkZlhso9P7xugiL3QwUOPX-sWMwq41JhgUL0HP2MwFqnR1MP_LbV0FHVU107JOlR4be7aLNnIPmL3l20KP3YuHTi_s311edc77oY4op2FOQQMHSAAUIxEjCU-1wgwoZDgnOs14JkyeJZwCiTJNYxyB5pGIo9THOLTQ0cLb2PpjYtxYVoXTpizVyNQTJwlnQGgcC-zRwz_oWz2xI3_djKKEEeaVLXS8oLStnbMml40tKmWnkmA5K1X6UuW8VM8eLI2TtDLZivxt0QPtBfBZlGb6v0k-D3q_ynCRKNzYfK0Syr5LLkAwOby9lM_XN09DzEES-AGMzIxA</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Kolstoe, E. M.</creator><creator>Iversen, T.</creator><creator>Østensvik, Ø.</creator><creator>Abdelghani, A.</creator><creator>Secic, I.</creator><creator>Nesbakken, T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</title><author>Kolstoe, E. M. ; Iversen, T. ; Østensvik, Ø. ; Abdelghani, A. ; Secic, I. ; Nesbakken, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>biosecurity</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>pig herds</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Specific Pathogen Free</topic><topic>Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Swine production</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><topic>Zoonoses - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolstoe, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Østensvik, Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelghani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secic, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nesbakken, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolstoe, E. M.</au><au>Iversen, T.</au><au>Østensvik, Ø.</au><au>Abdelghani, A.</au><au>Secic, I.</au><au>Nesbakken, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>125-130</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Summary
As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24798507</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.12132</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-1959 |
ispartof | Zoonoses and public health, 2015-03, Vol.62 (2), p.125-130 |
issn | 1863-1959 1863-2378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1653128870 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Animal diseases Animals Autumn biosecurity Campylobacter Campylobacter - isolation & purification Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology Campylobacter Infections - microbiology Campylobacter Infections - veterinary Hogs Humans Norway - epidemiology Pathogens pig herds Seasons Specific Pathogen Free Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms Swine Swine Diseases - epidemiology Swine Diseases - microbiology Swine production Time Factors Zoonoses Zoonoses - prevention & control |
title | Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A43%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specific%20Pathogen-Free%20Pig%20Herds%20also%20Free%20from%20Campylobacter?&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Kolstoe,%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=125-130&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.12132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1653128870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652151563&rft_id=info:pmid/24798507&rfr_iscdi=true |