Loading…

Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?

Summary As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zoonoses and public health 2015-03, Vol.62 (2), p.125-130
Main Authors: Kolstoe, E. M., Iversen, T., Østensvik, Ø., Abdelghani, A., Secic, I., Nesbakken, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363
container_end_page 130
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Zoonoses and public health
container_volume 62
creator Kolstoe, E. M.
Iversen, T.
Østensvik, Ø.
Abdelghani, A.
Secic, I.
Nesbakken, T.
description Summary As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/zph.12132
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1653128870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1653128870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMofkwv_ANS8EYv6pKcJmlvFBnOKVMHKhNvQpqmWm3Xmmzo_PVmH-5C8NzkEJ734fAitE_wCfHT_m5eTwglQNfQNok5hBREvL7cScKSLbTj3BvGjCVYbKItGokkZlhso9P7xugiL3QwUOPX-sWMwq41JhgUL0HP2MwFqnR1MP_LbV0FHVU107JOlR4be7aLNnIPmL3l20KP3YuHTi_s311edc77oY4op2FOQQMHSAAUIxEjCU-1wgwoZDgnOs14JkyeJZwCiTJNYxyB5pGIo9THOLTQ0cLb2PpjYtxYVoXTpizVyNQTJwlnQGgcC-zRwz_oWz2xI3_djKKEEeaVLXS8oLStnbMml40tKmWnkmA5K1X6UuW8VM8eLI2TtDLZivxt0QPtBfBZlGb6v0k-D3q_ynCRKNzYfK0Syr5LLkAwOby9lM_XN09DzEES-AGMzIxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652151563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kolstoe, E. M. ; Iversen, T. ; Østensvik, Ø. ; Abdelghani, A. ; Secic, I. ; Nesbakken, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolstoe, E. M. ; Iversen, T. ; Østensvik, Ø. ; Abdelghani, A. ; Secic, I. ; Nesbakken, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.12132</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24798507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animals ; Autumn ; biosecurity ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification ; Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Campylobacter Infections - microbiology ; Campylobacter Infections - veterinary ; Hogs ; Humans ; Norway - epidemiology ; Pathogens ; pig herds ; Seasons ; Specific Pathogen Free ; Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - epidemiology ; Swine Diseases - microbiology ; Swine production ; Time Factors ; Zoonoses ; Zoonoses - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2015-03, Vol.62 (2), p.125-130</ispartof><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24798507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolstoe, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Østensvik, Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelghani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secic, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nesbakken, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Summary As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>biosecurity</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>pig herds</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Specific Pathogen Free</subject><subject>Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Swine production</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><subject>Zoonoses - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMofkwv_ANS8EYv6pKcJmlvFBnOKVMHKhNvQpqmWm3Xmmzo_PVmH-5C8NzkEJ734fAitE_wCfHT_m5eTwglQNfQNok5hBREvL7cScKSLbTj3BvGjCVYbKItGokkZlhso9P7xugiL3QwUOPX-sWMwq41JhgUL0HP2MwFqnR1MP_LbV0FHVU107JOlR4be7aLNnIPmL3l20KP3YuHTi_s311edc77oY4op2FOQQMHSAAUIxEjCU-1wgwoZDgnOs14JkyeJZwCiTJNYxyB5pGIo9THOLTQ0cLb2PpjYtxYVoXTpizVyNQTJwlnQGgcC-zRwz_oWz2xI3_djKKEEeaVLXS8oLStnbMml40tKmWnkmA5K1X6UuW8VM8eLI2TtDLZivxt0QPtBfBZlGb6v0k-D3q_ynCRKNzYfK0Syr5LLkAwOby9lM_XN09DzEES-AGMzIxA</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Kolstoe, E. M.</creator><creator>Iversen, T.</creator><creator>Østensvik, Ø.</creator><creator>Abdelghani, A.</creator><creator>Secic, I.</creator><creator>Nesbakken, T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</title><author>Kolstoe, E. M. ; Iversen, T. ; Østensvik, Ø. ; Abdelghani, A. ; Secic, I. ; Nesbakken, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>biosecurity</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>pig herds</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Specific Pathogen Free</topic><topic>Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Swine production</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><topic>Zoonoses - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolstoe, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iversen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Østensvik, Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelghani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secic, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nesbakken, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolstoe, E. M.</au><au>Iversen, T.</au><au>Østensvik, Ø.</au><au>Abdelghani, A.</au><au>Secic, I.</au><au>Nesbakken, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>125-130</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Summary As Specific Pathogen‐Free (SPF) pig herds are designed and managed to prevent specific pig diseases, it might be feasible to expand the list of micro‐organisms also including zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter coli as this agent has its origin in pigs. In a previous survey, 15 of 16 of SPF herds were found free from human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Accordingly, three nucleus and seven multiplying herds were surveyed for Campylobacter to investigate whether the Norwegian SPF pig pyramid also might be free from this agent. In conclusion, the intervention of Campylobacter at the herd level might be possible as four of 10 SPF herds tested negative in two sets of samples from both autumn 2008 and summer/early autumn 2010. The four negative herds were all located in remote areas several kilometres away from conventional pig farming while the positive SPF farms were all situated in neighbourhoods with conventional pig production. It seems more difficult to control Campylobacter than some specific animal disease agents and another significant zoonotic agent, Y. enterocolitica, in pig herds.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24798507</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.12132</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-1959
ispartof Zoonoses and public health, 2015-03, Vol.62 (2), p.125-130
issn 1863-1959
1863-2378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1653128870
source Wiley
subjects Animal diseases
Animals
Autumn
biosecurity
Campylobacter
Campylobacter - isolation & purification
Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology
Campylobacter Infections - microbiology
Campylobacter Infections - veterinary
Hogs
Humans
Norway - epidemiology
Pathogens
pig herds
Seasons
Specific Pathogen Free
Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms
Swine
Swine Diseases - epidemiology
Swine Diseases - microbiology
Swine production
Time Factors
Zoonoses
Zoonoses - prevention & control
title Specific Pathogen-Free Pig Herds also Free from Campylobacter?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A43%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specific%20Pathogen-Free%20Pig%20Herds%20also%20Free%20from%20Campylobacter?&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Kolstoe,%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=125-130&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.12132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1653128870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4262-f23c3633933a5145196bca05323d0f1cbd6d7efd962314dc28043c64784b63363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652151563&rft_id=info:pmid/24798507&rfr_iscdi=true